They also expects if a woman can give birth to a baby in nine months, nine women only need one month to “produce” a baby. Or even just eight or seven women, because of synergy effects.
If that’s with it evenly distributed, then with all that weight as a virtual point source due to the difference in size between the baby and Earth, wouldn’t the baby collapse to its roche limit even faster? And as long as it’s not a kuggleblitz (that’s def not spelled right) black hole it would quickly consume the Earth and grow even larger, right?
Yes, but then we would better use human body density to determine the size of an object, it’s not going to be realistically (lol) a point source anyway and will take longer to become a black hole, I think 🤔
And if he doesn’t, thats a “loss” for some reason. Nothing is actually lost mind you, there is no 7.5 trillion pounds of baby meat in a dump somewhere.
Reminds me of the Reddit CEO who was sobbing that Reddit is not profitable (and that’s why they had to block 3rd party apps) while receiving a $200 million salary.
Add comment