sanzky,

Back in 2021 the supreme court had already declared abortion as not a crime, but the sentenced, while settled a precedent, did not applied in the whole country. This new sentence applies in the whole country and also forces mexican healthcare public institutions to provide abortion to any person that requests it.

Plume,

If the US ever finish their wall, by the time they are done with it, Americans will be the one trying to get over it…

BioDriver,
@BioDriver@beehaw.org avatar

Arizona and Texas punching air right now. I just wish women didn’t need to have to travel such distances to have them done

WtfEvenIsExistence,

Maybe if the US elect more republicans, Mexicans will stop coming in.

Not because of the walls, but because how enshittified the US will become under republican rule.

Sternout,

Maybe that’s been the plan of migrant haters all along

mooncabbage,

Sounds about right. Republicans will gladly step in their own pile of garbage just to be able to point and laugh at the other guy they perceive as their enemy.

Ertebolle,

In addition to being good policy, this is going to be a lifeline for women in border states. (and will I suspect be much harder to police or prosecute - it's very, very difficult to hold somebody legally liable in one country for an act committed in another)

sanzky,

how is this good specifically for women in the border? this applies equally in the whole country

Aidinthel,

The fact that Mexico is making progress on this is good to see, though also pretty embarrassing as a resident of the USA that our society is moving backwards at the same time.

wintermute_oregon,

We are fifty states. Many states are moving forward and some are moving backwards. It’s why congress needs to do something.

Olgratin_Magmatoe, (edited )

Congress can’t do anything because of the filibuster, two party system, and republicans though. The whole thing honestly needs an overhaul.

AccmRazr,

Don’t forget to include gerrymandering

PostmodernPythia,

The Senate not being population-based is part of the problem too. As are gerrymandering and not having universal adult suffrage or federal holidays for voting days. But a Constitutional Convention would be state-based, too, so we’d end up with something even worse than we have now.

Olgratin_Magmatoe,

Agreed. It’s just a disaster all around honestly. It can change, but it’s not easy.

wintermute_oregon,

You can wait out a filibuster. You just don’t allow new business until they’re done. That means they have to keep talking and eventually they’ll run out of speaking ability.

Olgratin_Magmatoe,

A filibuster raises the vote threshold, so it’s not something you can just wait out. And thank to how the filibusterer works nowadays, congressmen don’t actually need to get up there and talk, they can merely threaten to filibuster to raise the vote threshold.

www.npr.org/2022/01/17/…/filibuster-explained

wintermute_oregon,

What do you think a filibuster is? It’s an active debate. So yes, you can wait one out. If they can’t continue, then their time is over and you vote. It’s why they’ll get up and read books.

To break it, you don’t move on to new topics until they give up.

Olgratin_Magmatoe,

That’s how it used to work, not anymore:

www.npr.org/2022/01/17/…/filibuster-explained

wintermute_oregon,

Still work that way. You have three options. You cloture the person, you move to new business or you wait them out. You still have the option to wait. Nothing has changed.

Waiting means nothing happens. You just wait. If it’s important enough that’s what you do.

Olgratin_Magmatoe,

You cloture the person

And that essentially isn’t an option at times due to how difficult it is to reach the 60 vote threshold, which means nothing gets done, which means congress is basically useless.

wintermute_oregon,

Or you just wait them out. You do nothing until they relent.

Politics sometimes has to be ugly. What you don’t do is make sad excuses as to why things don’t get done. You just shut things down till they go for a vote.

Olgratin_Magmatoe,

You can’t wait out an indefinite filibuster. And it gets to become indefinite because they don’t actually need to talk at all.

wintermute_oregon,

They’ll get pressure from their party to stop it. At some point they’ll need to move to other business. It’s a battle of the nerves. Politicians have lost the guts to play chicken.

Olgratin_Magmatoe,

They actually get the opposite, support from their party. Because if you’re the minority party and you’re able to kill legislation that the majority party wants, it’s seen as a victory.

library_napper,
@library_napper@monyet.cc avatar

Don’t forget about the colonies

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • news@beehaw.org
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines