dmm,
@dmm@mathstodon.xyz avatar

in 1915: Albert Einstein submitted a paper to the journal "Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin" that would fundamentally alter our understanding of the universe [1]. The four page paper contained what became known as the Einstein field equations, which relate the geometry of spacetime to the distribution of matter within it [2].

Einstein's field equations were presented in the form of a tensor equation which related the local spacetime curvature (expressed by the Einstein tensor) with the local energy, momentum and stress within that spacetime (expressed by the stress–energy tensor) [3].

[Image credit: https://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView?url=/permanent/echo/einstein/sitzungsberichte/6E3MAXK4/index.meta]

References

[1] "Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation", https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-doc/273

[2] "Einstein field equations", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equations

3] "Einstein tensor", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_tensor

dmm,
@dmm@mathstodon.xyz avatar

"Gödel presented his solution to Einstein in the form of a manuscript on the occasion of the latter’s 70th birthday in 1949. Gödel was meant to have his manuscript ready for Paul Arthur Schlipp to include it in a book entitled Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist* (Schlipp, 1949). Gödel, ever the perfectionist, however did not finish his essay until about a month before Einstein’s birthday and even then delayed sending it off for a while (Dawson, 2006). Notorious for his attention to detail, Gödel’s six-page manuscript eventually included 34 footnotes."

https://www.privatdozent.co/p/godels-solution-to-einsteins-field

(2/2)

johncarlosbaez,
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@dmm - Nice! And it's interesting that in October of that same year he published an incorrect version of the equations for general relativity:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_general_relativity#The_development_of_the_Einstein_field_equations

promovicz,

@johncarlosbaez @dmm Reading Einstein, it rarely seems like he was afraid to be wrong. I like that because we're all guessing at some level.

__joerg__,

@promovicz @johncarlosbaez @dmm And also it seems he was not afraid to not add his co-authors to the authors list….

promovicz,

@__joerg__ @johncarlosbaez @dmm Probably not - he definitely gave credits and supported others.

__joerg__,

@promovicz @johncarlosbaez @dmm I cannot really judge, but some people doubt that, e.g. in the case of Brownian motion http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/theo1/hanggi/History/1.pdf

promovicz,

@__joerg__ @johncarlosbaez @dmm I sure don't want to idealize him. All the greats were flawed, and so are we - but what do we do about it? Are we willing to pass judgement when it is required, and refrain when it is not? Hard questions.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • physics
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines