joeroe,
@joeroe@archaeo.social avatar

@timelfen @dta_cthomas @christof Indeed, reading about the original design of the CRediT system (https://www.nature.com/articles/508312a):

"the sample [of authors surveyed] was relatively small and only corresponding authors were asked for their opinions. The taxonomy was developed and tested in the biomedical and life-sciences community — we have not tested its validity in other fields because we expect that there are field-specific contributor roles"

It doesn't seem like this caveat was ever followed up on.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines