drewdevault,
@drewdevault@fosstodon.org avatar

If I had a penny for every bloody Python package that ships code coverage or linting as a part of the test suite included in its release packages with <100% coverage and/or linter issues I might be able to pay for the required therapy to deal with that shit

joshix,
@joshix@fosspri.de avatar

@drewdevault 100% coverage is too much work. >90% would be good. But most don't have that

drewdevault,
@drewdevault@fosstodon.org avatar

@joshix coverage is a bad metric in the first place but at least don't make it a failure condition of your test suite in your stable release package

joshix,
@joshix@fosspri.de avatar

@drewdevault as failure condition? What the fuck. That's a really interesting choice

drewdevault,
@drewdevault@fosstodon.org avatar

@joshix they just assume downstreams don't run tests because the entire Python ecosystem and culture is a disaster

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •