@thor It would sound stronger, true but what does that mean exactly?
Lets say a russian brigade enters Estonia now.
What is "necessary" to do now?
Considering the size of the US military compared to the German military, a contribution of 10 regular soldiers seems reasonable, right?
Or shall we send a million soldiers because this are "all resources available"?
What is enough & who decides if a state didn't do enough?
What if the NATO state gets attacked as a result of a attack it started itself, shall we still protect the aggressor?
I know that statement is totally bs, but it helps to point out that strict rules in such agreements are not always helpful.
Overall it probably makes the most sense that every member contributes what is reasonable, needed in the situation and able and willing to do.
I really don't doubt that a attack from a non NATO state to a NATO state would end in a strong reaction right now.
But it's true that the NATO probably needs some reforms.
Overall not that happy with how some of it works etc.