hanno,
@hanno@mastodon.social avatar

As I explained there in detail, it all looks like there is some missing piece somewhere, something that the spec designers had in their mind, but haven't written down. And that's symptomatic: The spec contains multiple references to "other documents" and "elsewhere", but leaves implementors alone finding these. Even on a mere technical level, that's all hugely problematic. It looks like an unfinished early draft, but at the same time BIMI is already implemented and sold.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • cubers
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines