design_law, 14 days ago After failing to convince the USPTO to read the phrase "for an article of manufacture" out of 35 U.S.C. § 171, the bar appears to be plotting new ways to get design patents for disembodied designs.
After failing to convince the USPTO to read the phrase "for an article of manufacture" out of 35 U.S.C. § 171, the bar appears to be plotting new ways to get design patents for disembodied designs.
Add comment