kikobar, (edited )
@kikobar@acc4e.com avatar

I don't understand why this is considered an existential risk, with governments spending fortunes to 'fix the low birth rate problem'.

I believe it is good news.

We are clearly a species that needs to reduce its footprint on Earth. There is nothing sustainable about our ever-growing population.

Only in a distorted fantasy worldview of perpetual growth without negative consequences the low birth rate could be a concern.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68402139?utm_source=press.coop

starbreaker,

@kikobar Capitalism is a Ponzi scheme. The economy cannot grow if the population shrinks. A smaller pool of workers can command better wages, shorter hours, and more favorable conditions.

kikobar,
@kikobar@acc4e.com avatar

@starbreaker I believe the myopic view is not exclusive of the Capitalism.

Many other doctrines (including Communism) which drive for efficiency and growth without considering the full spectrum of the impact on the whole planet have the same invalid underlying assumption.

China and Russia are also pushing for more fertility rates.

kikobar,
@kikobar@acc4e.com avatar

@starbreaker the wrong assumption is that the economy HAS to grow. It doesn't.

What we need to do is improve the quality of living, not only of us, but of all the other living creatures on Earth in a harmonized and sustainable way.

Yes, a lot easier said than done, but boosting the fertility rate doesn't help in any scenario.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • sustainability
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines