Twitter Sued for $250 Million by Music Publishers asserting Copyright Infringement

https://i.imgur.com/kjV97t4.png

Twitter Hit With $250 Million Copyright-Infringement Lawsuit From Music Publishers

https://variety.com/2023/music/news/twitter-250-million-copyright-infringement-lawsuit-music-publishers-1235644414/


The National Music Publishers Assn., acting on behalf of 17 major music publishers, is filing a federal copyright infringement lawsuit against Twitter for its failure to license and pay for the music widely available on its platform.

The complaint seeks more than $250 million in damages for hundreds of thousands of noticed infringements of approximately 1,700 works.

“Twitter fuels its business with countless infringing copies of musical compositions, violating Publishers’ and others’ exclusive rights under copyright law,” the complaint reads in part. “While numerous Twitter competitors recognize the need for proper licenses and agreements for the use of musical compositions on their platforms, Twitter does not, and instead breeds massive copyright infringement that harms music creators…

“Twitter knows perfectly well that neither it nor users of the Twitter platform have secured licenses for the rampant use of music being made on its platform as complained of herein,” it continues. “Nonetheless, in connection with its highly interactive platform, Twitter consistently and knowingly hosts and streams infringing copies of musical compositions, including ones uploaded by or streamed to Tennessee residents and including specific infringing material that Twitter knows is infringing. Twitter also routinely continues to provide specific known repeat infringers with use of the Twitter platform, which they use for more infringement. Twitter profits handsomely from its infringement of Publishers’ repertoires of musical compositions. …

“Twitter’s unlawful conduct has caused and continues to cause substantial and irreparable harm to Publishers, their songwriter clients, and the entire music ecosystem. Twitter’s unlawful conduct enriches Twitter at Publishers’ and their songwriters’ expense and to the detriment of their copyrighted musical compositions. Twitter has rebuffed calls for it to obtain the licenses or other agreements needed for musical compositions to be lawfully used on its platform.”

An email to Twitter’s press account requesting comment returned an autoreply with a poop emoji.

The plaintiffs include: Concord, UMPG, peermusic, ABKCO Music, Anthem Entertainment, Big Machine Music, BMG Rights Management, Hipgnosis Songs Group, Kobalt Music Publishing America, Mayimba Music, Reservoir Media Management, Sony Music Publishing, Spirit Music Group, The Royalty Network, Ultra Music Publishing, Warner Chappell Music, and Wixen Music Publishing.

The NMPA has aggressively filed or threatened similar legal action against companies in the past, including TikTok, Twitch, Peloton, Roblox and others, which usually result in an agreement or settlement in the publishers’ favor. Twitter has undergone multiple layoffs and policy changes since it was acquired by Elon Musk last year.

NMPA President & CEO David Israelite said, “Twitter stands alone as the largest social media platform that has completely refused to license the millions of songs on its service. Twitter knows full well that music is leaked, launched, and streamed by billions of people every day on its platform. No longer can it hide behind the DMCA and refuse to pay songwriters and music publishers.”

nzodd,

Didn't realize there was a big piracy scene on Twitter. Time to go download some tunes. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, National Music Publishers Association?`

airportline,
@airportline@lemmy.world avatar

If only there was a way they could both lose

Skelectus,
@Skelectus@suppo.fi avatar

I don't know who to root for / against here

bobbysq,

I see the music industry as the "greater evil" here, but I think I'm rooting for both sides to spend a bunch of money (by normal person standards, it'll probably be a drop in the bucket for them) on legal fees before the inevitable settlement requiring Twitter to create a Content ID-esque system for videos.

BrooklynMan,
@BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml avatar

I see the music industry as the “greater evil” here

oh, gosh, I just don't know... I'm so ambivalent...

conciselyverbose,

Fuck twitter, but they have to win.

Rulings that hold platforms accountable for user-generated content completely fuck any free speech left on the internet. There are already mechanisms for them to get infringing content removed, and suing the platform isn't it.

GisterMizard,

Yeah, setting a precedent is the biggest danger here. If it's viable to sue Twitter, then it's viable to go after other social media. Including fediverse hosts.

clutchmatic,

Unless the hosts are hosted in Moldova or Russia

4am,
@4am@lemmy.world avatar

In order to be DMCA compliant and remain protected under S230 you need to respond to DMCA notices. If Steiger had been doing that then they’re not liable, full stop.

However I have a tinfoil hat theory: as part of his ranking of Twitter, musk has sacked the folks responsible for responding to takedowns, and either a bunch of them went unanswered. That, or the music industry smells blood in the water and wants to invalidate the DMCA in their own favor for any host that isn’t policing on their own (remember, with DMCA is it the sole responsibility of the rights holder to initiate the takedown process. Anyone going above and beyond that is doing it on their own). If Twitter loses then it puts safe harbor on shaky grounds.

BrooklynMan,
@BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml avatar

yes, but who do i want to lose more...

ugh, so torn...

teruma,

Unfortunately, you want to see Twitter win, because if the music dudes win, Twittwr won't be the last platform they attack, and you might actually like the next one.

OptimusPrimeDownfall,
@OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed.

pbjamm,
@pbjamm@beehaw.org avatar

If ever Lemmy adds Awards "The Dildo of Consequences" needs to be among the first wave.

muddybulldog,

Apparently they can’t even be bothered to pay their rent so this is not a particular shock.

It’s hard to believe that so many things are going so sideways that we’re starting to root for the likes of Disney and the major record labels.

sim_,

They haven’t been paying for their cloud services to google either.

tiwenty,
@tiwenty@lemmy.world avatar

Tbh I'm rooting for them all to burn together :p

usualsuspect191,

So, I've never used Twitter... They had music? I thought it was just short text comments and the occasional picture?

deacon,

I think this is in reference to the type of drama more associated with YouTube, wherein an audio or video clip posted substantially contains copyrighted material in a way not covered by fair use.

I haven't myself used Twitter since 2010 so I may be mistaken.

conciselyverbose,

Or it is covered by fair use and the music companies don't care and think they can assert their copyright anyways.

buhala,

You can upload videos and stuff which can have copyrighted sounds

buhala,

I love this. Wanna see if any of them care enough to actually address it or if he fired the staff responsible for that too.

Powderhorn,
@Powderhorn@beehaw.org avatar

Cartels gonna cartel.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@beehaw.org
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines