elizabethtasker,
@elizabethtasker@mastodon.online avatar

#EPSC (Europlanet Science Congress) is being held hybrid this year, and has an exciting program that includes a session on using new tools such as #VR in planetary science outreach.

But... it's 50 Euro per abstract submission, with no guarantee of acceptance. That's a fairly big punch when the Japanese yen is super weak.

YetAnotherGeekGuy,
@YetAnotherGeekGuy@hachyderm.io avatar

@elizabethtasker
What, pray tell, are they doing with the money?

elizabethtasker,
@elizabethtasker@mastodon.online avatar

@YetAnotherGeekGuy It does take considerable time to review abstracts and put together the program. But usually, I'd expect any payment for that to come from the registration fee.

nab26,
@nab26@astrodon.social avatar

@elizabethtasker @YetAnotherGeekGuy Usually those reviews are free right? Done out of the goodness of researchers hearts and so funded by their own funding (implicitly). So a good question is: what is this €50 actually for? To prevent junk abstracts? (In the age of A.I. that's borderline plausible...in other fields.) To get the whole thing off the ground?

elizabethtasker,
@elizabethtasker@mastodon.online avatar

@nab26 @YetAnotherGeekGuy I’m honestly not sure. It would be refreshing if the reviewers were offered some compensation, but I do agree it’s unusual.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • vr
  • cubers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • love
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • megavids
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines