design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Some more assorted thoughts on :

design_law,
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
  1. One interesting question that remains is:

LKQ x CurviSil = ???

In other words, how does/should the fact that design patents protect applied designs (not designs per se) affect the scope of § 103 prior art, if at all?

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Law360 coverage of , featuring some comments from me and several high-profile design practitioners:
https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1839570?nl_pk=2e71aa9c-c8f8-43ff-9d5a-fafec61b2085

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Okay, got two panels in the works. One online, soon; one in Chicago, in the fall. Stay tuned.

design_law, (edited ) to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Will GM file a cert petion?

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Would have been hilarious if the Federal Circuit released today. But alas.

meredithlowry, to random
@meredithlowry@mastodon.social avatar

Today in design patents:

D1020281 issued for a chair for outdoors.

design_law,
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

@asbestos @meredithlowry Pretty darned close (this patent is a good example). For more on why, see this short piece: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3329899

It's possible that the Federal Circuit might change the rules in . I don't expect a huge change, but I guess we'll see.

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Just out of curiosity, I looked up when the last Federal Circuit en banc design patent case, , was argued (6/2/08) and decided (9/22/08).

If were to follow the same timeline, we could expect a decision around late May.

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Look, if In re Rosen (1982) isn't too old to overrule, then neither is In re Zahn (1980).

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

"The judges seemed interested in tweaking the existing 'Rosen-Durling' test but struggled with getting the parties to clearly articulate a replacement approach wouldn’t be potentially just as bad."

  • Eileen McDermott via IP Watchdog

https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/02/05/lkq-en-banc-argument-suggests-cafc-could-soften-test-design-patent-obviousness/id=172880

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Last question in :

Judge: If we could only make one change [to the § 103 analysis], what should we change?

Lemley: Overrule Rosen/Durling

Judge: "That's not going to happen."

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Let's go! Panel will be Moore, Lourie, Dyk, Prost, Reyna, Taranto, Chen, Hughes, Stoll, Stark (everyone but Newman and Cunningham):

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Today is the day! will be argued before the en banc Federal Circuit today at 10 a.m. Eastern.

Audio link: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/home/oral-argument/listen-to-oral-arguments/

Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66745365/lkq-corporation-v-gm-global-technology-operations-llc/?order_by=desc

Here's a short preview from @patentlyo: https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/02/corporation-global-design.html

If you're interested in a deeper dive into the issue, here's an article I wrote: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1926162

For an update to my views on primary references, see § IV(C)(2) here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496762

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

BLaw covers the biggest design patent case of the year, with some commentary from me: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/rare-federal-circuit-en-banc-patent-case-threatens-design-test

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Upcoming patent events of interest (including our panel), via @patentlyo: https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/01/three-upcoming-events.html

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Please join Suffolk Law on February 6 for an online panel discussion on LKQ v. GM, moderated by me and featuring @patentlyo, @meredithlowry, Darrell Mottley (Howard Law) & Laura Sheridan (Google).

Get the details and register (for free) here: https://events.suffolk.edu/event/design_patents_en_banc_lkq_v_gm

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Please join Suffolk Law on February 6 for our online panel discussion on LKQ v. GM.

Details and (free) registration link here: https://events.suffolk.edu/event/design_patents_en_banc_lkq_v_gm

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Save the date: I'm organizing a panel on for noon Eastern on Tuesday, February 6, 2024 (the day after the oral arguments). It will be a free, online event. Hope to see you there!

design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar
design_law, to random
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago (IPLAC) is hosting a free online panel on on 12/7 at noon Central.

All the panelists wrote amicus briefs: Josh Sarnoff (DePaul Law), Frank Angeliri (Ford), Rob Katz (IDSA) and John Cordani (American Casualty Insurance). It's being organized and moderated by Christopher V. Carani (McAndrews, Held & Malloy).

https://iplac.org/events/meet-the-amici-en-banc-federal-circuit-case-lkq-v-gm-design-patent-obviousness-2/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines