In other words, how does/should the fact that design patents protect applied designs (not designs per se) affect the scope of § 103 prior art, if at all?
Just out of curiosity, I looked up when the last Federal Circuit en banc design patent case, #EgyptianGoddess, was argued (6/2/08) and decided (9/22/08).
If #LKQvGM were to follow the same timeline, we could expect a decision around late May.
"The judges seemed interested in tweaking the existing 'Rosen-Durling' test but struggled with getting the parties to clearly articulate a replacement approach wouldn’t be potentially just as bad."
Please join Suffolk Law on February 6 for an online panel discussion on LKQ v. GM, moderated by me and featuring @patentlyo, @meredithlowry, Darrell Mottley (Howard Law) & Laura Sheridan (Google).
Save the date: I'm organizing a panel on #LKQvGM for noon Eastern on Tuesday, February 6, 2024 (the day after the oral arguments). It will be a free, online event. Hope to see you there!
The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago (IPLAC) is hosting a free online panel on #LKQvGM on 12/7 at noon Central.
All the panelists wrote amicus briefs: Josh Sarnoff (DePaul Law), Frank Angeliri (Ford), Rob Katz (IDSA) and John Cordani (American Casualty Insurance). It's being organized and moderated by Christopher V. Carani (McAndrews, Held & Malloy).