politicalfinger, to random

This says it all about the border con job republicans are pushing.

“The nominee” doesn’t want the border issue settled!

Hey, Mitch, the last time I checked, the “nominee” has not been officially decided.

Why is congress being controlled and manipulated by a private citizen, running as a candidate?

Talk about racketeering!
A private citizen has absolute control over the legislative branch of government, in order to weaponize the government?

Hey, Jim Jordan. You need to open an investigation into wide-spread corruption, within the republican congress, and their candidate, who are weaponizing the federal government!

The legislative branch has a border deal, but Mitch McConnell, Mike Johnson, and Trump’s MAGA cronies don’t want to upset a CANDIDATE!

There has to be something unconstitutional there, somewhere?

Hey, US Supreme Court.
Is it unconstitutional for a political candidate to have absolute control over the legislative branch of the federal government?

politicalfinger,

The US Senate must hold Mitch McConnell in contempt of congress!

He admitted he won’t pass the border deal, at the request of a private citizen!

Talk about Separation of Powers!
Trump isn’t even part of any branch of the federal government!

Checks and balances are designed to root out corruption.

Congress cannot be controlled by a private citizen. That is the epitome of corruption, and McConnell put it in writing!




politicalfinger, to random

Is the republican congress being controlled and manipulated, through fear and threats from Donald Trump?

Seriously?

Our lawmakers fear a private citizen, who faces 91 felony counts?

Seriously?

Our lawmakers fear retribution from a political candidate?

Seriously?

Our lawmakers are actively conspiring to manipulate the United States Supreme Court, to grant immunity to a thug candidate they fear?

That is the epitome of:
Racketeering!
Authoritarianism!
Dictatorships!

If our lawmakers fear a private citizen now, what do you think will happen if he becomes president?

And this mobster wants immunity!







politicalfinger, to random

The First Amendment gives us the right to lie, but it does not protect us from the consequences of lying.

You can’t lie in court, under oath, to congress, at a senate judiciary hearing, a grand jury, or the FBI.

If lies were protected, you could lie without consequences.

The First Amendment actually gives us the right to tell the truth, and protects our right to tell the truth.

That’s why you “promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, in court.

There is not a court in the land that protects your right to lie under oath.

Except for US Supreme Court justices, who have absolutely no accountability for lies, corruption, and unethical indiscretions, for the rest of their lives.

That has to change!
Nobody is above the law!

The USSC MUST be independent and impartial!

We cannot have a separation of powers issue with the US Supreme court!

That would be unconstitutional!


  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • megavids
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines