Big_Twerp

@Big_Twerp@feddit.uk

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Big_Twerp,

So tell me you don’t understand without saying you don’t understand.

The HS2 act, which effectively set the costs (known, unknown and unknowable) was passed by a Tory government desperate not to upset their financial backers in the Home Counties.

Big_Twerp,

Double down on your ignorance by all means. The company is a government owned entity that does as it’s told by the government, and is bound the act. It existed well before the budget was set and well before things like land compensation were agreed.

Big_Twerp,

So… it seems that with a low turnout from tories, between them reform uk, Britain first and ukip took enough votes from the conservatives for labour to steal a win. I desperately hope that we send the tories packing next election but it’s hard to see this as anything other than a protest vote.

Big_Twerp,

It looks like they might be made to replace the roof lining (otherwise they would be contravening their planning commitments) so that will cost them.

Big_Twerp,

Unfortunately it won’t take. But… it is possible to transplant very large mature trees if you have enough money to do it so I really hope they give it a go.

Big_Twerp,

Russia has a lot of grain it can’t sell, NK has a famine and a lot of (probably rusty) soviet shells. It’s a match made in a goulag.

Big_Twerp,

As if the only impact of climate breakdown is heat. Also; where is India and china’s contribution to climate change. Frankly, this is bullshit.

Big_Twerp,

You hit the nail on the head there.

I expect all you have to do is follow the money to find out why their ideology is so flexible!

Big_Twerp,

Lol, you have just described our MP (and I suspect most Tory mp’s!)

Big_Twerp,

The land cost alone for hs2 runs into the billions, it’s just very expensive to do.

Big_Twerp, (edited )

You only mentioned china, where they don’t report on land costs because all land is state owned but yes I do believe land compensation is much less in china, not least because HS2 land compensation is significantly above market rate. Also; an authoritarian regime with only superficial regard for the health and well-being of their workers, that are paid almost nothing is certain to be cheaper. Suggesting otherwise is banal.

Edit to add Troll alert.

Big_Twerp,

I’ve worked as a civil engineering consultant in china, comparing how the deliver a major rail project to here in the uk is frankly moronic. It isn’t bias, it’s fact

Big_Twerp,

I’ve only got two decades of civil engineering experience in Europe china and now the uk to draw on. I can’t provide a source for the absence of Chinese reporting on land costs because you can’t prove a negative. Although it should be blatantly obvious that comparing the cost of building something in the uk to the cost in china is simply pointless. Here’s a link to a high speed train collision in china that killed a heap of people: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wenzhou_train_collisionAnd another one: cbsnews.com/…/high-speed-train-derailment-china/… and a link to construction labour deaths clb.org.hk/…/china’s-most-dangerous-industry-gett…

The point being that china has a very different equation when they go about doing things to here in the uk.

Frankly I shouldn’t have to do this for you.

Big_Twerp,

As I stated, china don’t publish that information and it doesn’t take a genius to work it out. Troll.

Big_Twerp, (edited )

Obviously blocking you doesn’t work otherwise I wouldn’t see this nonsense. I’m not your personal Fucking google assistant.

If someone tells you it’s raining outside do you ask them to prove it or do you look out of the fucking window?

Big_Twerp,

This is a well researched article which cites its sources and wasn’t posted by a Reddit bot so I have to wonder who is downvoting it?

Big_Twerp,

It’s essentially an honour based system so there’s no real consequences.

Although… I do wonder if there are grounds for the charge of misconduct in a public office. Johnson’s behaviour seems to meet some of the tests set by CPS but I expect it would need to be referred to them and that will never happen.

Big_Twerp,

The Commons Privileges Committee is not a judicial proceeding. It operates according to the rules and conventions of the UK Parliament. It is separate from the legal process, because only parliamentarians can make decisions about issues of parliamentary privilege. (Verbatim definition from parliament.uk above) So whilst I’d love to agree with you, the law cannot be applied because it is not a “judicial proceeding” by definition.

This is a demo legal advice question. Please can I get some help?

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic...

Big_Twerp,

You didn’t say what part of the UK you are from…

Big_Twerp,

Which, if you had actually read the article, is illegal.

I would put it in a high interest account, tell them once, by recorded delivery post and then sit on it.

Big_Twerp, (edited )

…or I might use their online chat and record it, that’s a bot and doesn’t do anything useful!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tester
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • InstantRegret
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • everett
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines