Danterious

@Danterious@lemmy.world

Other accounts:

@Danterious

@Danterious

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Danterious,

Are you talking about the commentors or the post? I am assuming you are talking about the commentors.

Danterious,

From the comments that you have been making it seems like you have a very negative view of other people and their ability to work together towards things that they both want (i.e. shared goals). This might be informed by your life experience and honestly, I’m sorry for what you have experienced that has led to such a negatively focused view.

I can’t convince you that anarchism can be good if you believe this staunchly. All I can say is that if you look at your surroundings you could find that people do this all the time.

An example I like to think about is driving. You know almost nothing about other drivers (how sane they are, where they are going, etc.) but we still drive and trust other drivers not to crash into us, and a majority of the time people are able to get to where they are going unharmed. This is an example of anarchy working in our everyday lives.

So, anarchism is being dead? Because that’s what happens when you reject authority - they fucking kill you. No exceptions; barely any delays.

As for this, my philosophy is that as anarchists we should follow the ideas that are based on the paradox of tolerance.

If we want a tolerant society, we need to be intolerant of intolerant ideas, or else those intolerant ideas over time become the norm.

The same goes for freedom (which is what anarchists want for everyone)

If we want a free society, we need to resist people that want to dominate, or else everyone will be dominated.

Danterious,

I mean there were a few murders of some billionaires sometime back but it didn’t seem to change anyone’s mind.

Source:

[1] independent.co.uk/…/barry-sherman-honey-murder-bi…

[2] nytimes.com/…/bob-lee-stabbing-san-francisco.html

Where can I get the data about Lemmy subscription patterns?

I have a fair amount of experience with data visualization, analysis etc and thought it would be a fun project to try to visualize the Lemmy network, specifically which instances have strong links to one another via subscriptions from users in one to communities in the other....

Danterious,

Personally I would love to see this kind of project done. But for it to work most people on the servers data that you are working with would have to be informed and given time to answer. I hope you reach out to the administrators of each instance and ask them if they would be ok with this and give them time to ask their users. Knowledge is power and if the visualization was public I think it could be helpful.

Danterious,

If you are interested there is a professor named Damon Centola that might be interested in dedicating time to gathering that data and might help with the visualization as well. If you are in the sociologist space or just interested you could reach out to him.

Danterious,

No problem just notify me if you ever decide to follow through.

Danterious,

Sorry for commenting again but I think there is a way for you to do this in a completely open, easy, and privacy-preserving way. You don’t need to access their database.

  1. Get a list of instances that you want to look at the subscription patterns for. (All the instances here + Lemmy.world)
  2. Go to that instance’s website, click the “Communities” tab at the top, and then click “All” It shows how many users from that instance are subscribed to that community (both communities from that instance and outside of that instance)

If you find a way to automatically (or manually) scrape this data from all of those websites you can create the visualization that you were talking about.

So you were right, the data is open source it is just specific to each website.

Danterious,

Not my title I just crossposted someone else’s but I can change it.

Danterious,

Would voting for the other party be voting in their interest or the least bad option?

Danterious,

I remember seeing the same things a while back. This is why I always explain what I believe before I use the common words for it.

Danterious,

I don’t think they hate black and trans people but whatever warped version of black and trans people that they have been told. There have been studies that show having a gay friend in real life make people more accepting and I assume that similar things could be shown for trans and black people.

Source https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/just-one-gay-acquaintance-can-change-hearts-minds-lgbtq-rights-n948911

Danterious,

If they were to vote for their values who would they vote for?

The democrats aren’t upholding these values either and while I agree that they are much better than the current republican party it doesn’t mean that voting for them would be voting in their interest but instead in the least bad option.

Danterious,

All that I am saying is that I think we are way past the time were voting is the most important thing we should be doing to make the situation better. People in power are going to make whatever they want illegal and use political justifications for them. There have been many states that have majority blue and majority red power and this same shit of empowering the status quo is common in both kinds of states. So I don’t believe either party is going to protect my rights if it doesn’t benefit them somehow and instead I am going to trust in the direct actions I and people that want change are actually taking to make things better.

Danterious,

But then the deeper question is “why do you think these other people don’t deserve these things?” and then they tell you all about how they are sinful, lazy, violent, or whatever else that they use to justify shunning those other people which is obviously incorrect but it is what they believe so if they actually believe all of that stuff then obviously they are gonna be hostile towards those kinds of people.

It is better to understand and try and remedy why people are doing awful and horrible things than dismiss and judge them because the first option actually can lead to a solution and the other is going to isolate them and make the problem 10x worse.

Being empathetic is the first step to forming trust. Also by the way even though I am saying all of this it doesn’t mean that if someone is being rude to you or insulting your friends you should just turn the other cheek and let them stomp all over you. What it means is that you have to be assertive with who you are and what you stand for but also being willing to listen and understand (not necessarily accept) what other people are saying.

Edit: Also FYI the far right are people and not all of them are 24/7 talking about far right stuff. So statistically they likely do want “normal relatable things” most of the time.

What social taboos that exist today do you think will not be around in 100 years?

I was reading a book on social life of the upper-middle class and new rich of the American 1920s and realized so many things we now do proudly were considered socially taboo back then. This was especially the case for clothing, makeup, women in certain public spaces, etc. What do you think will be different in the 2120s? Or...

Danterious,

Voluntarily chopping off your arm. (To replace it with something else)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • normalnudes
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • InstantRegret
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • everett
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • tester
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines