@FreeinTX@poa.st
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

FreeinTX

@FreeinTX@poa.st

I'm starting to think anti-semite means nigger.

What does your employers ESG score say about you?

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

RealRaul, to random
@RealRaul@poa.st avatar
FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@RealRaul Dog on a hog?

Oh, dyke on a bike.

kaia, to random
@kaia@brotka.st avatar

you haven't taken your state-prescribed Soma today

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@lain @kaia Why? Serious question.

DenisCOVIDinfoguy, to auscovid19
@DenisCOVIDinfoguy@aus.social avatar

COVID vaccines cut risk of virus-related heart failure and blood clots, study finds

Researchers analysed health records from more than 20 million people across the UK, Spain and Estonia and found consistent evidence that the jabs protected against serious cardiovascular complications of the disease

The latest study sought to investigate the overall impact of a Covid vaccination, given that infection with the virus itself is known to significantly raise the risk of heart failure and various other serious cardiovascular problems.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/mar/12/covid-vaccines-cut-risk-virus-related-heart-failure-blood-clots-study

Study: https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/2024/01/24/heartjnl-2023-323483

@auscovid19

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @DenisCOVIDinfoguy @auscovid19 @EightEight @Omega_Variant @n3f_X @Nou @zombiefinatic @bonifartius @toiletpaper >While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

At this point you should be punched square in the dick for ignoring what I've been telling you for years even when every study you post says the same fucking thing.

If your over 65 AND have several serious pre-diagnosed comorbidities, you are at a higher risk of dying from this weaponized cold virus and its possible that this jab helps lower that risk.

However, if you are not over 65 OR you're relatively healthy, the jab poses a greater risk than the weaponized cold virus. Even this study acknowledges the increased risk of dying from a blood clot or heart attack because of the jab, nor covid, the jab.

I showed you that even back as far as the 80's doctors knew that if you were old as fuck and half dead, a flu that got you sick enough to get you put into the hospital put you at risk of having a heart attack. I showed you 1 year where over 80% of old as fuck patients put into the ICU for the flu were having heart issues.

If you're not old as fuck, and you're not half dead already, and covid doesn't put you in the ICU, your risk of a heart attack or blood clot of almost immeasurable. However, just like the jab manufacturers have been forced to admit, getting the jab does increase your risk quite a bit.

Stop being a fucking idiot.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@HonkHonkBoom @jeffcliff @DenisCOVIDinfoguy @auscovid19 @EightEight @Omega_Variant @n3f_X @Nou @zombiefinatic @bonifartius @toiletpaper Governor Cuomo and Governor Whitmer (and a few others) saved a huge amount of money for the state by placing covid patients in the same living spaces as the elderly in rest homes. Between social security and pension payments, we are talking hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

merchantHelios, to random

it's pretty embarrassing that trump still wont go back to twitter now. does he not realize that massive audience is a big part of why he became president at all?

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@merchantHelios Everything he posts on truth social gets posted on X. What's the benefit to going to X versus posting on his own platform and having it repost on X?

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@merchantHelios Explain, if you care to. As it is, any time the media wants to cover his posts, they drive attention to his platform. Isn't that better for him?

18+ svenno, to random
@svenno@neomobius.com avatar

Happy birthday to meeeeee 🥳 🥧 🎉

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@svenno HB muh dood.

Djeep, to random

Respiratory illnesses are surging in NYC and nationwide, CDC warns — here are the states with the highest rates

https://trib.al/IdgdrYd

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@Djeep >“Unfortunately, COVID continues to mutate, so the prior vaccines that we’ve had are no longer effective against COVID,” she said.

@jeffcliff

She. Dr. Kristin Englund of the Cleveland Clinic

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep That will be useless in 3 months, and might frameshift on you and kill you, give you a rough DNA that will give you cancer, pop your heart, or clot your blood. And have done so to the point of politicians covering up data to prevent a jab scare.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep >Unfortunately, COVID continues to mutate, so the prior vaccines that we’ve had are NO LONGER EFFECTIVE against COVID,” she said.

Aka useless against covid.

Covid has not shown to frameshift and again, just like your study shows, unless you end up in the ICU, COVID, and most viral infections, do not pose a notable threat to your health. And, of course, if you do end up in the ICU over COVID, you're most likely well over 65 and have 2 or more pre-existing comorbidities.

Whereas jabbed patients are dropping dead while otherwise perfectly healthy.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep Holy shit, you're conflating.

The doctor didn't say anything about a 'vax-only policy'. She said "Get your latest jab because the earlier jabs don't do shit against the new covid variant".

"Making transcription errors" which lead to variants is not the same as causing your DNA to frameshift in a way that may kill you.

Your study shows, very fucking clearly, that if you are not put into the ICU from your bout with covid, the increased risk of the ailments listed in the study are low. And, I showed you that these exact same ailments had the same increases for the flu.

If you are over 65 AND have numerous preexisting comorbidities, you are at a much, much higher risk of being put in the ICU and therefore are at higher risk of suffering from the ailments listed in that study.

The report you listed from San Diego County showed exactly that. 88% of the patients in their ICU for Covid, Flu, and RSV were over 65. 76% of them having known serious comorbidities.

If your over 65 and have comorbidities, the problem is viral infections. If you're young and healthy, the risk is far more serious with the jab. And, we are only at year 3 of 10, with long term testing, and we have no actual control group.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep @covid19 We do not have a control group. The control groups used in the in the ordinal testing were told to get jabbed. Now, we only have randos that were smart enough to not get jabbed, but no pre-screening, no double blind studies, and no placebo group.

You don't even know how to science or wut?

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep @covid19 Everyone keeps telling you that they are going to blame covid for the damage being done by the jab.

You:
> If the mRNA can do it, covid can do it since it's the same spike protein...

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@Djeep @covid19 The greentext is @jeffcliff 's assertions, copy and pasted, word for word.

Not the same? Tell him that.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep @covid19 You seem to be conflating the intentional frameshifting that they did to create new mods on the jabs with the unintended frameshifting that's being discovered.

If it was "no big deal" or, as you suggested, common and expected, they wouldn't have issued a statement promising to "fix" future batches.

The study that I posted about frameshifting seems to suggest that while there have been no reported negative consequences as a result of the findings, there very well could be future problems from a frameshift that causes the body to change proteins in the DNA that could be deadly.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep @covid19 You don't understand what a control group is, do you?

How do you do a double blind study if there is no placebo group?

Double blind - the researchers don't know whose jabbed, the patient doesn't know of they are jabbed. Patients are screened to rule out pre- existing issues. Testing needs time to allow for slow developing conditions, like cancers, immunity disorders. and, like just recently discovered, frameshifting. 10 years is the standard. All of this is gone. We got 6 months of actual testing and have only "ordinal testing" forever more.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @Djeep @covid19 They haven't been doing double blind studies. They told the control group to get jabbed after the emergency use authorization was issued.

There is no placebo group, and you'd certainly know if you got jabbed or not.

How do you do a double blind study, where the patient doesn't know whether he's been jabbed or not?

EricCarroll, to longcovid
@EricCarroll@zeroes.ca avatar

Half of survivors still had symptoms at 3 years, more reinfections amid | CIDRAP

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/half-covid-survivors-still-had-symptoms-3-years-more-reinfections-amid-omicron

> Three years after infection, 54% of adults in a Chinese cohort still had at least one symptom, most of them mild to moderate in severity, with higher rates of reinfection and pneumonia after the emergence of the Omicron variant, shows a study published yesterday in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(23)00387-9/fulltext

3-year outcomes of discharged survivors of following the omicron (B.1.1.529) wave in 2022 in China: a longitudinal cohort study

> Most long COVID symptoms at 3 years were mild to moderate, with lung function recovering to levels of matched controls. Survivors with long COVID had a higher proportion of participants with re-infection and newly occurring or worse symptoms 3 months after omicron infection than those without long COVID. Re-infection had increased symptom occurrence but not increased reduced daily activity. Although the organ function of survivors of COVID-19 recovered over time, those with severe long COVID symptoms, abnormal organ function, or limited mobility require urgent attention in future clinical practice and research.

@longcovid

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @EricCarroll @longcovid @babelcarp What the jab status of those with this 3 year long covid? In a country that had a jab mandate. And can we see the breakdown of the jabbed versus unjabbed in the study that you cited?

Correlation ain't causation, so let's see some other coalaries to look for possible causes.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @longcovid @babelcarp @EricCarroll The illness are lasting longer in those who destroy their immunity with the jabs. Several studies even suggest that reinfection and increase severity upon reinfection caused by the immune system destroying jab. And the jab did exist 3 years ago, November 2020 in the US, however, subsequent jabs are known to cause long covid symptoms. Jimmy Dore, for example had long covid caused by the jab.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @longcovid @babelcarp @EricCarroll What do you mean? The spike protien?

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @longcovid @babelcarp @EricCarroll No. China. Where the virus allegedly originated.

How many of those studied were jabbed. Simple question. How many of those studies had 3 year old long covid? How many times were they jabbed while trying to recover?

Not hard concepts. If you fuck your immunity up, your immunity wont work gud.

FreeinTX,
@FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

@jeffcliff @longcovid @babelcarp @EricCarroll There has been jabs for 3 years. I'm not simply referring to those jabbed before they got infected, either. Getting jabbed after infection while in recovery is going to compromise your recovery, too.

Nazareno, to random
@Nazareno@noagendasocial.com avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • FreeinTX,
    @FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

    @Nazareno If Mexico elects a woman, it's proof that the Mexican elections are rigged.

    FreeinTX,
    @FreeinTX@poa.st avatar

    @mischievoustomato @Nazareno Mexican machismo will not tolerate a woman leader.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • Durango
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • kavyap
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • ngwrru68w68
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines