JoBo

@JoBo@feddit.uk

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

JoBo,

Are you on the wrong thread?

JoBo,

Still not getting why you’re on this thread, sorry.

JoBo,

I don’t feel like you understood a word of the article you are completely ignoring. Maybe take it to a thread where someone cares about your decontextualised nitpicking.

JoBo, (edited )

You need to learn to think about what you are posting and where you are posting it. I’d ask you to delete your ridiculous posts but I see they have generated some more patient responses than mine. You should read them and also, try to comprehend them.

JoBo,

“Perceived issue”?

That is not what the article is about and nor is it why it was posted. Take your lack of humanity somewhere else. It is not welcome here.

JoBo,

They’re wanting it to be a different film about something else.

Why are you making shit up?

JoBo,

Everything is not fucking fine. This thread is unwillingly hosting a spirited defence of a white man who was not even directly criticised for doing the European thing of extolling their own development while ignoring the gigantic piles of bodies they stood on, and stole from, and are still standing on, and stealing from.

If you do not get why you and your oafish mate are not welcome on this thread, it is 100% not surprising.

Fuck off you dimwitted, boring, fragile cunt.

JoBo,

RTFT

JoBo,

The article is about a rarely told history, not the film. The film is a bouncing off point for the history, and the APALLING ACCUSATION THAT YOU MUST NOT LET STAND was made much more strongly by the sub-editor than the author.

Of course, it would be entirely valid had the author spent much of the word count complaining about how white men always manage to make it about themselves. But he didn’t. You did. Because you are not reacting to the article, you are reacting to the emotional response you had to the article when you read the sub-editor’s summary which hinted at the merest possibility that a white guy was getting criticised in the copy.

You are beyond predictable, beyond pathetic, and really, really not welcome on this thread.

Trans-people who had surgery: Afterwards did your ability to do the center of gravity type posture challenges switch?

Like, did your actual center of gravity or muscular attributes change over time to make you pass or fail where previously you had the other outcome of one of these alleged “men can’t do this but women can” type challenges?

JoBo,

That’s not what it says? There is a little bit of speculation about technique, with no evidence. But most of it is about differences in centre of gravity. Which is a biological (average) difference and suggests that trans people might indeed reverse their ability to do/not do these challenges after gender-affirming hormones.

It’d be very easy to test the various theories offered. Fuck knows why Vice didn’t instead of just quoting speculation.

JoBo,

There are bazillions of papers about physiological changes due to hormones. You don’t need a demonstration, you need to develop enough intellectual curiosity to research things that don’t exist solely inside your own head.

JoBo,

It’s a massive, massive lake. It could sustain several Nessies, should any exist.

JoBo,

It’s a stunt to encourage tourism to the area. You don’t need to get upset about people having a bit of fun.

JoBo,

but there’s a fixed food supply

You understand that fish breed, right? That all the food that any of us will ever need for generations to come does not currently exist in the here and now?

JoBo,

No one has even quantified the entire ecosystem of Loch Ness. What makes you so cocksure of yourself?

JoBo,

Fair

JoBo,

It’s worse than that..

For lower rate tax payers, it starts at half the income tax rate (with no national insurance). So 10% instead of 32%. For residential property, 18% (with no NI) so 18% instead of 32%.

For higher rate income tax payers it’s half the income tax rate (with no national insurance). So 20% instead of 52% (if NI wasn’t also tilted in favour of high earners). For residential property, 28% (with no NI) so 28% instead of 52%.

But higher rate tax payers get a massive cut in NI too at not much above the higher rate income tax threshold, paying only 2% NI on earnings above the higher NI threshold, so on that portion of their earnings it is 20% (or 28%) instead of 42%.

Then the very rich get to play with massive loopholes, only paying tax if they feel like it. Which, mostly, they don’t.

JoBo,

The Spanish FA not only have not forced him to resign, they have threatened to sue Hermoso on his behalf. The FIFA suspension is necessary because they will not act. The (now) 81 players resigning is necessary because they will not act. The entire coaching team resigning is necessary because they will not act.

There will be serious repercussions and the deeper they dig this hole, the worse they will be. But the things you cite are a response to the refusal of his employer to do anything at all.

JoBo,

As you might reasonably have guessed, there is a long and sleazy history with Rubiales and Vilda. This is not blowing up out of nowhere.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • megavids
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines