Feature the following:
Base 3 themes (Clearly White, Kinda Dark and Just Black)
Chromecast support
Choose from 10+ now playing themes
Driving Mode
Headset/Bluetooth support
Music duration filter
Android Auto support
Wallpaper accent picker on Android 8.1+
Material You support on Android 12+
Monet themed icon support on Android 13+
Folder support - Play songs by folder
Gapless playback
Volume controls
Carousel effect for album covers
Home screen widgets
Lock screen playback controls
Lyrics screen (download and sync with music)
Sleep timer
Easy drag to sort playlist & play queue
Tag editor
Create, edit and import playlists
Playing queue with reorder
User profile
30+ languages support (help translate the project: Crowdin
Browse and play your music by songs, albums, artists, playlists and genre
Smart Auto Playlists - Recently played, most played and history
A. Device part of a business infrastructure:
Just don’t change anything; those policy are there for a reason!
B. Consumer device:
1/ If we’re talking about proprietary hardware/software forcing your network to use a specific DNS, then you need to provide more details because you should be able to change it.
2/ There is also the case for a malware:
A fresh start is preferable.
Disinfect the system while offline, then back up the needed files.
Reinstall the system on a new/old formatted drive.
With the exception of taking your privacy/security seriously this time.
Sorry for the delay, haven’t checked Lemmy for a while, The pattern isn’t repeated with me, if I could easily share a screenshot of the app I would have shared it.
I always reverse engineer troublesome apps (To put it lightly) to disable the ability of screenshot, among other changes (don’t rely on internal feature).
They’re constructed hierarchy not natural (That hints that someone didn’t want to be the fuckup alone & created a destructive system for everyone) otherwise we would be living in a socialist utopia.
Mozilla opposes a proposal because it goes against their principles and vision for the Web.
They believe that any browser, server, or publisher that follows common standards should be considered part of the Web.
Standards are designed to be independent of specific hardware or software, allowing for a wide range of devices, operating systems, and browsers to access the Web.
This diversity of choices promotes accessibility and overcomes personal obstacles.
Mechanisms that restrict these choices harm the openness of the Web and are not beneficial for users.
The proposal’s use cases rely on the ability to detect non-human traffic, which could hinder assistive technologies, automatic testing, and archiving and search engine spiders.
These tools require access to content intended for humans in order to transform, test, index, and summarize it.
The proposed safeguards are unlikely to be effective and fail to address these concerns adequately.
Mozilla acknowledges the importance of addressing fraud and invalid traffic but finds the proposal lacking in practical progress for the listed use cases and highlights clear downsides to its adoption.
So much for green while supporting unsustainability with Microsoft closed source products (Yeah there’s apple too, giving that one the benefits of the doubts for now), plus the addiction industry of processed food and sugar & nootropics.
That’s object-oriented neural programming, stereotypical with corporate advertisements.
There are plenty already, why not a joint?
More solidarity/less division would be nice but it doesn’t mean that some individuals wouldn’t need to prove themselves to the tasks.
Without accountability it’s moot but it’s not like it’s possible with the current technological advancements & as always they create a hierarchy about fucking everything.