@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

ada

@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone

I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It's working for me in that version of firefox. Have you tried incognito mode?

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

No thanks. That sounds like a way of getting jumped on by nameless anti queer trolls who hate on queer folk for daring to exist.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Because they're not the only people out there, and what I need is an easier way to tell the two groups apart

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It doesn't work that way.

The people that you want me to engage with believe I should be robbed of my rights, denied medical care, and sometimes encourage me to kill myself.

I am an advocate, visible and vocal in my day to day life. But I need some spaces that aren't that, where I don't have to have my shields up and be in super defence mode just to share some memes and talk about board games.

I've been involved with community development for close to 30 years. I know how it works. I've seen it all.

Your comment, whilst well intentioned, misses the reality of the cost of openly being a member of a minority that is actively targeted by bigots with hate in their hearts.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Maybe you need to create dadly or kdadbin?

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I'd love to stand, but she-pees don't seem worth the effort

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Is there an equivalent on Lemmy to “limiting” like on Mastodon?

Not yet unfortunately. I am greatly looking forward to it being implemented though!

but there are probably grey area cases

I'm sure there are. But my community's safe spaces aren't the place for that cases to be debated

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

So, posts get federated when someone is subscribed to the group in question, but not before then. If you're the first person on your instance to subscribe to a group, then you won't see content from before then. It's designed that way, because sending the entire community history every time a new instance pops up isn't sustainable.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

So, new or newer instances will not be able to view old posts and comments from established instances?

They can, they just have to search for it manually. So if you see content on a group that your instance isn't aware of for some reason, if you copy and paste the URL in to the search box of your instance, it will pull the post across for you to interact with.

Wouldn’t this behavior discourage new instances from forming as the bedrock of content grows?

Not really. Aside from the fact that things like mailing lists remain useful even without easy access to their archived content, there are a few mitigating factors as well

Firstly, as I mentioned above, you can manually pull content across.

Secondly, if someone who can see the old thread replies to it, then that will force it to federate to your instance, as long as someone on your instance is subscribed to the group.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines