Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

agamemnonymous, to whitepeopletwitter in There are no guardrails in life
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Uh, that pop-up is “unpleasant feelings”. Pain, discomfort, bad taste/smell, etc. If you went outside and started eating dirt, your brain would pop-up with “Hey, this tastes yucky, you should stop”

agamemnonymous, to politicalmemes in Exactly
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Individuals having $44 billion to spend is most of the world’s problems

agamemnonymous, to pissposting in where are you on the Leland scale?
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Bears eat goats and goats eat oats and little lambs eat ivy, a kid’ll eat ivy too, wouldn’t you?

agamemnonymous, to me_irl in me_irl
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Well, spirit phone was 8 years ago. Neil hasn’t done much under the Lemon Demon name since then

agamemnonymous, to news in “CSAM generated by AI is still CSAM,” DOJ says after rare arrest
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

First off, this is obviously a sticky topic. Every conversation is controversial and speculative.

Second, I don’t really see a lot of legitimacy to the “gateway” concept. The vast majority of people use some variety of drug (caffeine, alcohol, nicotine), and that doesn’t really reliably predict “harder” drug use. Lots of people use marijuana and that doesn’t reliably predict hard drug use. Obviously, the people who use heroin and meth have probably used cocaine and ketamine, and weed before that, and alcohol/caffeine/nicotine before that, but that’s not really a “gateway” pipeline so much as paying through finer and finer filters. As far as I know, the concept has fallen pretty heavily out of favor with serious researchers.

In light of that perspective, I think you have to consider the goal. Is your goal to punish people, or to reduce the number and severity of victims? Mine is the latter. Personally, I think this sort of thing peels off many more low-level offenders to low-effort outlets than it emboldens to higher-severity outlets. I think this is ultimately a mental-health problem, and zero-tolerance mandatory reporting (while well-meaning) does more harm than good.

I’d rather that those with these kinds of mental issues have 1. the tools to take the edge off in victimless ways 2. safe spaces to discuss these inclinations without fear of incarceration. I think blockading those avenues yields a net increase the number and severity of victims.

This seems like a net benefit, reducing the overall number and severity of actual victims.

agamemnonymous, to microblogmemes in Oh no.
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

She was just seventeen, you know what I mean

agamemnonymous, to leftymemes in Lefty Nemesis
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I repeat, this is a rescue operation. Those on the right don’t need to be defeated, they need to be saved. There is no “us” and “them”, only subsets of “us” who are hurt and confused. “War” and “enemy” are the language of the hurt and confused.

agamemnonymous, to music in What are your favorite mashups?
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Every Neil Cicierega Mouth album

agamemnonymous, to leftymemes in Lefty Nemesis
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

We are not at war. There is no enemy. This is a rescue operation.

agamemnonymous, to asklemmy in Who agrees that the Internet and social media are toxic?
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

The environment is toxic, pathogens are ubiquitous. Immune systems protect us from most pathogens, which only present a serious threat to the immunocompromised. The toxicity of the Internet and social media is indicative of compromised social immune systems.

agamemnonymous, to politicalmemes in It's okay, tankies love fascism, so they're not put out by the result
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Could you give exactly one example of that ever happening?

agamemnonymous, to funny in That's not troubling at all
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Those are distinct points from the one I made, which was about the characteristics listed. Sentience and sapience do not preclude a propensity to

regularly ignore directions, restrictions, hallucinate fake information, and spread misinformation because of unreliable training data

agamemnonymous, to funny in That's not troubling at all
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Llms are fucking stupid. They regularly ignore directions, restrictions, hallucinate fake information, and spread misinformation because of unreliable training data (like hoovering down everything on the internet en masse).

I mean, how is that meaningfully different from average human intelligence?

agamemnonymous, to leftymemes in Nice Guy
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Good on you, it’s never too late to learn.

agamemnonymous, to politicalmemes in fixed it
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Third party candidates might aim to fix those issues, sure. Unfortunately, so long as our elections remain First Past the Post, third party candidates are not viable. In this system, third party voters aren’t fixing anything.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines