bloodfart

@bloodfart@lemmy.ml

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

bloodfart,

You have two problems.

Transferring between your laptop and desktop is slow. There’s a bunch of reasons that this could be. My first thought is that the desktops got a slow 100mbps nic or not enough memory. You could also be using something that’s resource intensive and slow like zfs/zpools or whatever. It’s also possible your laptops old g WiFi is the bottleneck or that with everything else running at the same time it doesn’t have the memory to hold 40tb worth of directory tree.

Plug the laptop into the Ethernet and see if that straightens up your problems.

You want to work with the contents of desktop while away from its physical location. Use a vpn or overlay network for this. I have a complex system so I use nebula. If you just want to get to one machine, you could get away with just regular old openvpn or wireguard.

E: I just reread your post and the usb is likely the problem. Even over 2.0 it’s godawful. See if you can migrate some of those disks onto the sata connectors inside your desktop.

bloodfart,

I solder new usb connectors and all manner of other connectors on to stuff all the time.

I’m at a 100% success rate getting data off stuff that just needs new connectors.

If you need data recovered, the literal best case scenario is that it’s just got a bad connector.

bloodfart,

I’ve never seen anyone say both sides are the same but lots of people say neither side is acceptable.

bloodfart,

I’ve never seen anyone who thinks neither candidate is acceptable try to argue for one over the other.

I know personally plenty of people who advocate sitting this one out and some like myself who say we ought to vote third party (psl in my case) though.

I’m really surprised the dyed in the wool true believer dems aren’t pushing for ol genocide Joe to step down at the convention.

bloodfart,

So what’s your red line? If genocide isn’t enough to get you to turn your back on the democrats at the very least unless they drop Biden from the ticket, how far is too far? How bad can it get before you decide it’s more important to support a third party you actually believe in?

Mine wasn’t even the genocide.

bloodfart,

Okay, but like I asked, when do you turn your back on that and work toward something else? When do you say to yourself “it doesn’t matter which of these two are better by whatever metric, I won’t stand by and assent to either of them”?

Surely some action by the Biden administration is far enough beyond the pale to make you look for a different option, right?

Even if you took a purely utilitarian approach, at some point both major parties are so far beyond what you consider acceptable that the effect of a third party vote cast with full knowledge that party won’t win is of greater utility than some poison compromise.

bloodfart,

I wasn’t framing a moral argument. Don’t you have a point Biden could cross after which you’d see more utility in building up a third party for next time?

What do you think will happen if trump is declared the loser?

bloodfart,

Most Scratched Liberal

bloodfart,

I keep acting like there’s a possibility of getting someone other than Biden or trump because there is.

I made reference earlier to Biden stepping down at the convention. That’s possible, although we’d need another ‘68 to prompt it. I think that’s more likely than trump not getting the nod at the rnc, but I’m sure they’ll be some subset of weirdos there calling for their own guy instead of him.

But let’s assume there’s no chance of getting a different candidate from one of the two parties. Even then, like I said earlier, Biden was past the pale for me years ago. Im not gonna vote for trump unless his platform changes wildly, so in that case im not acting like your assertion isn’t true, im acting like it doesn’t matter.

Because to me it doesn’t.

And I keep asking you where your limit is. Because everyone has one.

So how far is too far for you? When do you look at two distinct bad choices and say “no thank you”?

bloodfart,

do you really need five paragraphs and a topic sentence to not support the IDF?

bloodfart,

It’s not rare to see the anti gun crowd advocating police violence.

bloodfart,

We’re training too many “security” people.

bloodfart,

I mean, try it. Sometimes you can’t tell if something is the os or the users till you do.

bloodfart,

Because most oss maintainers are more afraid of their work disappearing due to service shutdowns than they are being profiled by data miners.

Everyone has seen some example of a tool or resource hosted on a persons private server end up taken down because they couldn’t afford it, the isp or university stopped offering hosting or because they simply couldn’t keep doing it due to death or old age.

That’s what people who create software are afraid of. The loss of that creation, not the loss of the privacy of people who contribute to it or download it.

bloodfart,

All your concerns are true of remote x sessions and while I’m not familiar enough with Wayland to defend this claim, I’d bet they are true of remote Wayland sessions too.

The old way of doing a secure remote x session was by tunneling it through ssh. When I needed remote desktop reachable anywhere I used passwordless 2fa ssh as the tunnel.

How exactly were you planning on initiating this connection to the host machine from an untrusted client, using their binaries?

bloodfart,

Someone else said to get a usb2.0 hub. This fixes the problem.

USB is a bad standard for a lot of reasons. The hid specification across versions is one of em.

bloodfart,

Yeah, I guess if you’ve accepted a genocide being committed in your name we are pretty far apart.

This is not to chastise or shame, but to convey a personal experience: no amount of what we now call self-care will cover lending your support to stomach churning atrocity or standing idly by during its commission.

When the people doing it tell you to support them or you’re next the situation can’t be made any more clear.

bloodfart,

I can’t assume you understand my viewpoint because you selectively quote my words to change their meaning, put words in my mouth and dodge questions i ask (just like youre accusing me of here!).

I never said that all the establishment unfriendly media was getting banned. I said that there’s an active campaign to control media that includes a tiktok ban. I asked you what establishment unfriendly media isn’t getting banned in order to look at those examples, their reach, their position and alignment relative to the american political system and their level of consent or hand in glove cooperation with the american political system.

the point of that is to illustrate how there is cooperation between the american political system and media, how there is control exerted by the political system on that media and when those two are not present, that media is not allowed when it cannot be minimized or silenced.

compared to how the regime responded to the rail strike, it’s unimportant how it responded to other labor actions that didn’t threaten it.

the rail strike was an action that opposed and threatened the biden administration. the other labor actions you bring up were not an imminent danger to the regime. at best that could be interpreted in the words of the reverend doctor as a desire for the absence of conflict over the presence of justice.

a more realistic outlook might be that the biden administration cynically viewed a powerful labor action as something to be crushed when it’s in opposition to that administration as opposed to representative of a core value or even a necessary constituency.

what is the greater measure of a mans values, how he responds to something when given time and resources and under no imminent pressure or how he responds when threatened? what is the greater measure of an organization made up of many men?

how can you possibly get mad at me for implying you haven’t read a book as milquetoast as manufacturing consent when you take blinken at face value and agree with him that tiktok is too emotional to be treated like other “informative” sources when those “informative” sources express IDF actions in the passive voice?

i’ll end by combining our two great tastes, restating myself, selectively quoting myself, and asking some questions:

you brought up trump and made a metaphor to explain how voting for Biden is necessary (one that minimized a genocide!) so let’s talk about trump. Do you truly believe that he’s an existential threat to America? What do you think will happen if trump is declared the loser? Is there a red line Biden could cross that would make you abandon voting for him against trump and instead vote for the third party you actually believe in?

bloodfart,

the alternative isn’t not to participate!

the alternative is to give voice to your true beliefs and desires!

i guarantee there is a ticket that you would support. you may not believe in the party for socialism and liberation but there is definitely some group that actually represents your politics!

even if you don’t truly walk away from omelas, never to return, telling the democrat party that you won’t support a genocide isn’t not participating! it’s using your meaningful, powerful voice to tell them that you represent voters they could have if they just don’t run the perpetrator of a genocide!

stand up and let them know that you won’t tolerate their bullshit!

imagine even the most goofy outcome, biden steps down at the convention and they run kamala and someone else on a platform of peace. wouldn’t that be balm to your soul? wouldn’t you be proud that you stood up even on the vile and worthless internet for what’s right instead of a poison compromise?

you have the power to make a difference, use it!

bloodfart,

surely you’re not just turning to insults instead of reasonable dialogue?

come on, tell me how you feel, what motivates you, why you have the ideas and outlooks that you do!

bloodfart,

can’t say i didn’t try…

bloodfart,

there literally are not only two options. you can join me and vote la riva. i’m sure the greens are running someone if youre aligned that direction.

if you just feel petulant that day there’s a whole host of jokers that are always around and while their platforms might be as asinine as “give everyone a pony” (see what i did there?), at least youre not supporting a genocide.

you have options! your voice matters more in the weird harmony of people calling for the democrats to run anyone but biden than it does in the discordant cacophony of those browbeaten and bullied into pulling the lever for the architect of our broken nation who’s currently pissing away the cost of universal healthcare on weapons shipments to israel!

bloodfart,

i tried over and over again to engage with you and find out your outlook but after you said it wasn’t worth your time you started insulting me.

come on, you can do better than that!

tell me why you think what you do! tell me why you think it’s better to run biden than any other candidate!

bloodfart,

Why not tell me your opinion?

Come on, your ideas are worth hearing!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • osvaldo12
  • kavyap
  • rosin
  • anitta
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Durango
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • vwfavf
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines