erlend_sh

@erlend_sh@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

erlend_sh,

Every damn time. My poor heart.

All David Attenborough headlines should start with ‘Still alive and well David Attenborough…’

erlend_sh,

Heh sure! Maybe I can get away with a slightly longer shorthand, like APub.

edit: Hey look at that, we can edit post titles in Lemmy ✨

erlend_sh,

Yep. It’s Mastodon-compatible. Currently it’s UI-less (backend-only) like GoToSocial.

erlend_sh,

Thanks for the tip! I’ll reach out to them.

erlend_sh,

Yep, there’s a clear avenue here. Discourse (where I no longer work, so I shouldn’t really have that staff title any longer) is also implementing ActivityPub, so the Rust forum will actually be able to subscribe to this hypothetical /rust community as well. We just have to give them a good enough reason to do so, by achieving a modicum of unification through this group-follow proposal.

Then it’ll be up to the Rust team to decide which particular /rust community on the fediverse they will hook up the official forum to as their trusted gateway into the larger network.

erlend_sh, (edited )

Congrats! Photon looks amazing, both on Desktop and mobile. Great work 👏

Just hypothetically speaking: Would you be okay with Photon being adopted as the new official frontend for Lemmy?

I have no say in this, but I feel like it’s something the Lemmy team should consider.

erlend_sh, (edited )

The general idea is good, but I still believe the best solution is the ability for Communities to follow other Communities. That is essentially a fully automated version of this sibling proposal.

This has been explained in great detail by ‘jamon’ here:

github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1113#issuecom…

This basically lets Communities opt to federate directly with other Communities, abiding by the same network dynamics as the fediverse at large, I.e. cross-network moderation by (de)federation.

Here’s a succinct description of the problem that C-C following solves:

If you are an active user (not moderator) of Lemmy, the requirement for this becomes apparent almost immediately. One of the biggest strengths of these forum are communities-at-scale. Being able to easily post and interact with large groups of people is the benefit to the user that makes Lemmy (and all other social media) appealing.

As a user, I recently wanted to post to AskLemmy. Almost every single instance has thier own separate AskLemmy implementation. Naturally, I’d tend to post to the one with the most users. But inherently, I’m missing the majority of users by only being able to post to one. I.E., I posted to AskLemmy@lemmy.ml (which had 3k users), but by doing that, I’m missing out on the users from lemm.ee, behaw, lemmy.world which in total are far more than 3k.

erlend_sh,

I’ve been reading a lot of your exchanges on the Lemmy GitHub and I can tell you with a high degree of confidence that you are not the subject of a hazing ritual. What’s going on is a miscommunication issue; there’s no ill will directed towards you.

The Lemmy devs are under a great deal of stress these days due to the recent influx of activity, both on the big Lemmy instances as well as the Lemmy GitHub. You’ve clearly gone to great lengths to investigate various SQL bottlenecks in Lemmy, and this work does not go unnoticed or unappreciated.

The problem you’re likely running into is that the Lemmy devs are trying to address a wide array of issues, whereas you are zoomed in on some very specific performance problems. Whether or not the core devs are wrong when they say your findings are irrelevant is beside the point. What they are really saying is that they do not have the attention bandwidth to try to see what you are seeing right now.

If you find yourself unable to work with the Lemmy project, there are other fedi projects in Rust like Mitra or Kitsune which might be more receptive to your contributions. I’m personally very interested in seeing rudimentary Lemmy (Groups et.al.) compatibility in Kitsune.

We need a more user-friendly approach to telling people about the Fediverse

I'm assuming most of us here want a large community. The reality is most people aren't into technology nearly as much as many of the people actually on the Fediverse. For other people who are into tech (like myself and a lot of people here), the federation technology itself being promoted as a core component of the appeal makes...

erlend_sh,

Yeah, just a single instance recommendation is best imo. Having to choose between two instances is still a significant mental load compared to the singular options most people are used to when joining a new platform.

erlend_sh,

Heh yeh it’s kind of a mashup of two different streams of thought. I might repurpose ‘fediverse is a movement’ for a new, more cogent article.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • everett
  • tester
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines