« Leurs plaintes ont finalement été entendues. Au Salon de l’agriculture, les syndicats de salariés agricoles critiquaient l’indifférence du gouvernement à les inviter autour de la table des négociations pour répondre à la crise agricole. C’est désormais chose faite pour deux d’entre eux. »
Some comments I saw written in the replies on a Youtube video about the #FNAF controversies from the game dev's donations to Republican politicians (like Mitch McConnell) that I thought were worth screenshotting, instead of letting them disappear in the morass:
@EzraHendler
"i just read this whole thread and there were so many different things thrown around that i wanted to say something about some of them.
While not all members of the republican party are racist or homophobic (in fact a very large number are not), the people that Scott donated to quite clearly are. Whether or not he supports their ideas and beliefs does matter on a personal level, but the donations the money can still be used to do enact terrible laws against people who just want the same rights for themselves as what others have.
Not all Republicans are fascists, and the person who many people were saying said that did not actually say that. I have no idea where that came from, it was just randomly thrown in there.
While his donations to charities absolutely do matter and should be called out, they do not erase the existence of his other donations.
The thing about Scott being a middle-aged white guy in Texas was just a joke for the video, it didn't actually mean anything.
Saying that you don't care about politics does not mean politics ceases to exist, or aversely affect millions, not just in America, but across the entire world (btw I am American)."
Here's another, same thread. Honestly, genuine thoughtful correspondence CAN be had in Youtube comments. But unfortunately it gets drowned out in the unceasing tidal wave of idiotic, hateful crap. At least you can type several paragraphs at a time on Youtube...unlike Tiktok, which won't even let you type a full sentence (encouraging you to record a video response instead, because yay more content for them to put ads on)
@ mandoingshitonline: "See, that's called privilege, if you were gay, trans, etc... You wouldn't vote for someone who would take away your rights, no matter how great their economic policies were, sure, donating to a racist, homophobic or sexist politician doesn't necessarily make YOU racist or homophobic, but, it makes your privilege clear, and people are in their right to be angry or offended by this, and they are free to boycott you, as again, contributing to the FNAF games, contributes to Scott's wallet, wallet Scott will use to donate to politicians who intend on taking away your rights.
Sure, Scott isn't Homophobic, or sexist probably, but he donated to people who were, out of a place of privilege, and people should be free to express their disdain and to decide to not support the franchise, and they are allowed to spread the information, same way as Scott is allowed to make these donations with the money he's earned."
@britt After some thought, it isn’t that terrifying. It isn’t as scary as the Brooklyn Knights first mascot, the Brooklyn Knight—seriously, it looked like a toned down version of Lord Zedd.
I've just watched the #FNAF movie by #ScottCawthon and I kinda like it. I mean I like it a lot. I know it's a controversial movie, but it was just a banger for me. The storyline is just fits. Not too much like it has a specific genre, since it's balancing constantly between horror and thriller very nicely. There were a few scenes that felt off, but in conclusion I'd rate it 9/10. You rarely see this good movies nowadays. The production has an organic backstory, which adds even more value to it.
