spocko,
@spocko@mastodon.online avatar

I just read the ruling. It's good at explaining why the Court did certain things.
I still think the "directing others" phrase is a loophole for Trump.
However the court did include the phrase "with the knowledge that such interference is likely to result;" this is good since it's absurd to pretend that doesn't know what his followers will do.
TV lawyers now have to explain what happens when Trump doesn't stop.
Link to order https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/D.O.motion4contempt-FINAL.pdf

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines