Teri_Kanefield,
@Teri_Kanefield@mastodon.social avatar

Of course the problem has gotten worse since 1998.

This explains how news junkies who consume lots of legal opinions like this: "this is a strong case!" or "the special counsel is screwing up!" end up less informed and more unhinged from facts and reality.

https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=uclf

2/

earthlingusa,
@earthlingusa@mas.to avatar

@Teri_Kanefield Yes, this trial is entertainment. The press is loving the “vonShitzinPants” reference brought up by Donald’s own lawyer. But I’d rather hear your thoughts about the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity case.

Teri_Kanefield,
@Teri_Kanefield@mastodon.social avatar

@earthlingusa There is nothing to say at this point other than try to guess what the Court will do.

Right?

MoiraEve,
@MoiraEve@mastodon.world avatar

@Teri_Kanefield At least news junkies read and consume news. News junkies may not be literate in legal opinions as you’d like, Teri. But there is a massive chasm between those who actively seek out political news and the vast majority of the country. And the media ecosystem itself (which includes X & FB) has shifted away from news and politics.

Teri_Kanefield, (edited )
@Teri_Kanefield@mastodon.social avatar

@MoiraEve

It depends on what news junkies consider "news."

If they confine themselves to actual news, you are correct.

If they are watching cable TV and listening to legal pundits offering evaluation about how well the prosecution is performing its investigative functions, it is not "news."

It is entertainment.

Such people are less informed because they become more unhinged from facts.

Teri_Kanefield,
@Teri_Kanefield@mastodon.social avatar

@MoiraEve They become less informed because they are seeing all events through a partisan lens.

IOW, they are being presented with a distortion of the world.

Let's do a scale of 1 - 10.

10: Consumes lots of actual factual news.

5: Consumes no news.

1: Consumes something that is called news but offers a distortion of the world.

Who is worse off? The person at point 5 or the person at point 1?

I suggest that person 5 can be easily educated with a few facts.

1 is a lost cause.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines