adredish,
@adredish@neuromatch.social avatar

@brembs @knutson_brain
@neuralreckoning

A question that came up in a recent (in-person) discussion: Has anyone compared the reproducibility or the validity of bioRxiv preprints with published journal articles? Are preprints less reliable than peer reviewed journal articles? It would seem we have enough examples now to check this.

albertcardona,
@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@adredish @brembs @knutson_brain @neuralreckoning

To add that preprints can have more references than the journal versions, due to space constraints for the latter, and likewise more text, less tight.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • tester
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines