Expressing concerns about moderation policy on lemmy.ml

This was originally posted to lemmy.pineapplemachine.com: https://lemmy.pineapplemachine.com/post/5781

It has also been posted to lemmy.ca: https://lemmy.ca/post/591991


Lemmy is federated and decentralized and that means that we can all coexist regardless of our differing political opinions. I think it's important to preface this by saying that I am not offended by or concerned with anyone's politics, and I'm certainly not here to argue with anyone about them.

My concern is that users are being banned and content is being removed on lemmy.ml citing a rule that is not publicly stated anywhere that I have seen.

Moderators of lemmy.ml are removing posts and comments which are critical of the Chinese government and are banning their authors.

This came to my attention because of how lemmy user bans are federated just like everything else, and I was confused about why my instance had logged a lemmy.ml user ban citing "orientalism" as the reason for the ban.

Screenshot of my own instance's modlog, as viewed by an admin

I noticed that the banned user had recently commented on a post in !worldnews that had been removed with the reason "Orientalist article".

Screenshot of banned user's history on lemmy.ml

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Here's the article that was removed, titled "China may face succession crisis". It was published by axios.com, which mediabiasfactcheck describes as having "a slight to moderate liberal bias" and gives its second-highest ranking for factual reporting. The article writes unfavorably of Chinese President Xi Jinping.

https://www.axios.com/2023/06/06/china-may-face-succession-crisis

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/axios/

I had not remembered seeing anything in lemmy.ml's rules that would suggest that "orientalism"—meaning, as I understand it, the depiction or discussion of Asian cultures by people in Western ones—was against the rules. So I checked, and I found that there was not. Not on the instance's front page, and not in !worldnews.

Screenshot of instance rules for lemmy.ml

Screenshot of community rules for !worldnews

There is a stated rule against xenophobia, but I think that xenophobia is not widely understood to include Westerners writing critically of the actions of an Asian government.

This is where I went from confused to concerned.

Lemmy instances have public moderation logs, which I think is a very positive thing about the platform. So I looked more closely at lemmy.ml's moderation log.

Please note that moderation logs are also federated. It's hard to be 100% sure which instance a mod action is actually associated with, looking at these logs. The previously mentioned user ban and post removal were, I think, definitely actions taken by lemmy.ml moderators. My own instance's mod log identifies the banning moderator as a lemmy.ml admin, and the removed post was submitted to a lemmy.ml community. I've done my best to verify that all of the following removals were really done by lemmy.ml moderators, but I can't be absolutely certain. Please forgive me if any of them were actually made on other instances that do have an explicitly stated rule against orientalism.

Removed Comment Ah yes. Being against China's racist genocide is racist. China, the imperialist ethno-state, is clearly innocent. by @CrimsonOnoscopy reason: Orientalism

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Removed Comment Lol. Thinking some countries have better governments than others is supremacist? Whatever, dude. By the way. If there are any countries with decent governments, I don't know of them. But like. If there were decent countries, they wouldn't behave like China. by @balerion reason: Orientalism

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

These following moderator actions did not specifically cite orientalism, but did not seem to be breaking any of the instance's or community's explicitly stated rules.

Banned @0x815 reason: Only makes anti russia and anti china, crosspostst from reddit. 2nd temp ban expires: 9d ago

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Removed Comment Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Tibet are all Colonies of China, which it treats as Colonial Territories, by - Forcibly destroying the local culture. Forcefully extracting to harm of the locals. Genocide, abuse, kidnapping, rape. But there is no point in engaging to you. You are a liar. You know you are. When you deny genocides, you put yourself on the same side as the fascists and reactionaries of the past. by @CrimsonOnoscopy reason: Rule 1 and 2

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

I have no affection for the Chinese government and I do not call myself a communist. I would not enforce a rule against orientalism on my own instance. But I think that lemmy.ml's moderators are entitled to enforce whatever rules they please. It's only that, as the largest single lemmy instance so far, I believe that they have an obligation to disclose these rules, and an obligation to not ban users or remove content for failing to follow unobvious and unstated rules.

I'd like to raise some awareness about this, and I'd like to openly ask the moderators of lemmy.ml to state the rules that they intend to enforce clearly and explicitly.

I will be very clear and state it again: I am not asking for anyone to change their opinions or to not enforce a rule that they believe in. That is the great thing about lemmy, that we can coexist in this federated community even when we don't share the same opinions. What I am asking is for lemmy.ml's rules to be clearly stated, because I think it does not reflect well on the broader community if the predominant instance moderates its users and content according to rules that are not being explicitly disclosed.

guyman,

Dang. I wish we could have moderators that just removed trolls instead of people with opposing views.

But they are allowed to do what they want. I'm just talking about having a Lemmy instance with moderators like I described.

PeterPoopshit,

I got banned for "trolling" when all I did was participate in shitty ask lemmy. I created that place with the vision of being like shitty ask reddit but shitposting isn't allowed here and setting up a custom instance is really hard. Fuckin bullshit.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

You joined a site and didn't read the global rules. There are many places for shitposting, some that even embrace it, and this place makes it as clear as possible that this isn't one of them.

hanabatake,

Don't want to be that guy but... Historically, lemmy.ml was a leftist place (like radical left). The first surge of user was when a pro-CPC subreddit was banned. They created an instance that was the biggest for some time if I recall correctly (for the curious).

ShortBowledClown,

Describing tankies as 'leftists' seems a bit disingenuous

CooperRedArmyDog,

Marxist-Lenninists are the most common form of communist, with the most successful Socialist states in history, I do not understabd yout hostilities.

ShortBowledClown,

Communists don't constitue all leftists and there are plenty of communists that aren't authoritarian apologists and genocide deniers.

GarbageShootAlt2,

Remember that the largest political party on the planet is the Communist Party of China. I regret to inform you that factoring in Georgists for the sake of argument does not change the math very much.

"Genocide denier" sure seems like a harsh thing to call someone without substantiation. Do you believe that Tibetans were genocided in the '90s like western media told us at the time?

ShortBowledClown,

Ah yes, China's only political party. I wonder why they have so many members? I'm sure everyone is a staunch believer of the party and it's values too.

Banning people under the guise of 'orientalism' for mentioning the genocide as the OP raised above doesn't seem unsubstantiated. I'm taking about the genocide that's currently happening. You ever met a Uyhgur whose family has been disappeared and are unable to return home?

GarbageShootAlt2,

China has multiple political parties, your statement needs more qualifiers. If someone wants to hold a municipal office, they can join other parties for that and many people do.

Also, you don't need to be a member of it to participate in Chinese civil society, and in fact become a member is somewhat difficult in spite of the volume of membership.

I’m sure everyone is a staunch believer of the party and it’s values too.

This is a lame excuse because the same can be said of any organization, and yet even western sources acknowledge the high degree of support the CPC has.

Banning people under the guise of ‘orientalism’ for mentioning the genocide as the OP raised above doesn’t seem unsubstantiated. I’m taking about the genocide that’s currently happening. You ever met a Uyhgur whose family has been disappeared and are unable to return home?

I don't think you have either, since people don't get "disappeared". The matter of their detention is public record and they typically can return home on weekends, and have generally already gone home because the detention is not indefinite and the program is winding down.

But I've seen this song and dance before: https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3182072

ShortBowledClown,

China has multiple political parties, your statement needs more qualifiers. If someone wants to hold a municipal office, they can join other parties for that and many people do.

Oh you're talking about the eight subservient parties that must acknowledge the CCP's primacy in order to be allowed to exist? Sub-parties maybe, but even that is generous.

This is a lame excuse because the same can be said of any organization, and yet even western sources acknowledge the high degree of support the CPC has.

It's not an excuse, it was calling out the unfounded assumption you were asserting in your comment. I'm sure the survey data of people who's communications are closely monitored are entirely accurate and not at all influenced by fear of retribution. Let me guess, China's internet is open, uncensored, and unmonitored too?

I don’t think you have either, since people don’t get “disappeared”. The matter of their detention is public record and they typically can return home on weekends, and have generally already gone home because the detention is not indefinite and the program is winding down.

Making more unfounded assumptions. I have been fortunate enough to befriend Uyghur's who have had family members abducted by the Chinese government. It being a matter of public record is laughable. Do you honestly believe ANY government would create a paper trail let alone make it publicly available for people being held in indefinite detention? Since you're so knowledgeable I'm sure you can produce some documents. I'm looking forward to looking them over.

Linking a cherry picked articles from two decades ago isn't the slam dunk you seem to think it is. I'm sure I can jump on google scholar and find a contradicting source.

JasSmith,

While true, the left/right axis becomes meaningless if we allow each side to define themselves by only their well-behaved adherents. For example, it would sure be convenient for Republicans in America to claims that Trump isn’t really on the right, and he doesn’t represent their views. In this case, the values embraced by Marx overlap heavily with values often held by people who describe themselves as leftists.

That said, I actually do think the left/right axis is meaningless. Humans are so much more complex than a reductive spectrum.

HornyOnMain,
@HornyOnMain@lemmy.ml avatar

reddit liberals when they're asked to not be racist for three seconds: https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/0d70e4cc-c43d-4608-a7d0-54d287a832d4.mp4

larktreblig,

Modderation Log might be a good feature so that moderators can moderate their fellow moderators

GarbageShootAlt2,
nutomic,
@nutomic@lemmy.ml avatar

Locking this thread as the discussion isnt going anywhere productive. If you dont like the moderation in !worldnews, you can subscribe to a different one or create your own.

pineapple,

Locking this thread as the discussion isnt going anywhere productive. If you dont like the moderation in !worldnews, you can subscribe to a different one or create your own.

I have not complained about the moderation in !worldnews. I am not asking that there be any change in moderation. I feel that I was very careful in making this clear, in the post.

What I have asked is that the moderation policy be stated more clearly and openly. I believe that it is in everyone's interest that people coming to lemmy.ml understand the rules that they are expected to follow.

heartlessevil,

The "ml" in "lemmy.ml" refers to marxism-leninism. It doesn't really get more clear than that.

grumpychocobo,

I'm sorry but who would know that's what .ml means if they didn't have previous knowledge? lol I mean, if we want to be literal, it's the domain code for Mali.

CARC0SA,

but who moderates the moderators?!?!

there needs to be some sort of union of the users to stop this rampant authoritarianism

Slyke,

Moderators moderating moderators. But who monitors the moderator moderators?

CARC0SA,

dictatorship of the modertariat

TheOubliette,

Rule 1 says no racism or xenophobia. May the new Reddit users learn to recognize their own chauvinist positions are both and bannable, whereas on Reddit they are structurally promoted at the highest levels.

pineapple,

Rule 1 says no racism or xenophobia. May the new Reddit users learn to recognize their own chauvinist positions are both and bannable, whereas on Reddit they are structurally promoted at the highest levels.

Okay. My position is that they should be informed of this up-front, and that it should not come as a surprise after they have already unwittingly broken the instance's rules.

m532,

Racists don't deserve to be informed.

pineapple,

Racists don’t deserve to be informed.

Everyone has to learn somehow. Surely you, yourself, were ignorant of this at one point, and had to be taught. Even if you were fortunate to learn at a younger age than others. No?

m532,

But why are you advocating for racists?

pineapple,

But why are you advocating for racists?

I'm not. Why are you evading my question?

m532,

It's not our job to educate racists.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

They are not advocating for racists.

TheOubliette,

It's literally the first rule in the sidebar. If you want to create a "how to not be racist and xenophobic" post to help racist and xenophobic Redditors here, you can always do that.

I don't think that's how social policing really works, though. You don't learn because someone gives you a guidebook, but because you get called out for spitting in public or feel unsafe if you show off Nazi tattoos. And all the schools theoretically say Nazis are bad, but I see tolerance for Nazis rising, and tightly bound to this is a lack of social policing. Look at the people who took so little convincing that the Sonnenrad isn't so bad so long as the Good Guys (TM) are wearing it.

You can help out with this by calling out the orientalism on display in this thread as well.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

I do support the need to make Nazis feel unsafe in public, but ostracizing them is never going to teach them anything except how to disguise their acts. This tactic has a purpose to prevent the spread of a minority opinion in public, but that tactic doesn't apply in this scenario, where a bunch of people are coming in who think they're doing nothing wrong because they've normalized ignorant criticisms of PRC and think it might as well be Nazi Germany.

Don't compare them to Nazis, these people sincerely believe that the CPC are "committing genocide" and an "authoritarian dictatorship". The problem isn't that they think racism or xenophobia, as a concept, is acceptable, it's because they don't realize what they're saying is racist or xenophobic, they think it's an objective fact.

Banning them for "orientalism", without clearly linking it to "Rule #", evidently doesn't teach them that their comments were xenophobic or ignorant or racist. It makes them think this place is run by propagandists who won't accept a critique of PRC, and doesn't solve anything.

If the sidebar explains that orientalism is all these things, at least there is an opportunity for them to understand our perspective and learn and change their behaviour, instead of just assuming we're the problem and doing the same thing everywhere else.

TheOubliette,

No, social policing absolutely does work and it's how every healthy community functions, up to and including ostracization of those who refuse to learn and adapt. Those that fail to intentionally do so will end up doing so anyways, it will just be in the form of reinforcing the existing power imbalances in society, as they are unconsciously normalized.

Nationalistic, xenophobic, raxist, anticommunist frenzy is actually a very Nazi thing to do, though I was using the example of displaying Nazi tattoos, as I think most people would be able to, at least in theory, sympathize with socially policing the display of Nazi symbols.

Strong disagree on banning with an easily looked-up word isn't effective pedagogy, and I'd also like to point out that you're assuming the only teachable person in that situation is the person getting banned, which is not true. Communities adopt a shared expectation. They see the other person get banned and so long as this isn't a dealbreaker for them, will be sticking around to tacitly support it. But either way, it should not be surprising if someone who's used to getting away with xenophobia and racism and maybe, like you say, doesn't yet recognize it as such, doesn't "get it" immediately. Maybe they even demand to speak to the CEO of anti-racism and anti-xenophobia to lodge a concerned complaint. This is a coping process that is fairly common and is on many people's paths to shedding wrong and inherently alienating and toxic views. Speaking of which, I haven't seen anyone here specifically signing up to deprogram these people, but I do see some people just doing it anyways while others critique that it's happening in a wrong way. What is conspicuously missing is an alternative, particularly one the critics are themselves actually doing. In my experience, this means the critics are just a bit more sympathetic to the orientalist claims, but aren't comfortable being direct. Another win for the "we will ban you" strategy.

Finally, I have to reiterate that looking up the word isn't hard. That's not a real barrier here. You can see plenty of people defining and patiently explaining it in this thread and still observe the lazy, unlistening pushback (the laziness is bad faith even if the chauvinism is sincere). Sure, maybe more sidebar explainers would be a handy way to decrease the time mods spend explaining how to not be racist to racist people, but it isn't going to change the learning process or community expectations one iota because that isn't really how people change their minds in the first place. Someone changing their mind usually (not always) looks like them disagreeing with you repeatedly, then not talking about it for a while, then finally showing agreement. It's rarely something that happens by reading some rules or having one discussion, so the user is getting banned in the meantime anyways lol.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

Nationalistic, xenophobic, raxist, anticommunist frenzy is actually a very Nazi thing to do, though I was using the example of displaying Nazi tattoos, as I think most people would be able to, at least in theory, sympathize with socially policing the display of Nazi symbols.

Like you said, most people recognize that glorifying Nazism is wrong.

Most of the people coming to lemmy.ml don't recognize that calling PRC an genocidal authoritarian dictatorship is wrong. This is an extremely normalized POV in places like USA and lots of Europe. Even among people who consider nationalism, xenophobia and racism to be wrong. People who have Nazi tattoos know what they are doing, and know why they are being ostracized. So this is why I emphasise that finding ways to systematically hint out that orientalism IS xenophobic and not just "stating the objective facts", is important.

It’s rarely something that happens by reading some rules or having one discussion

Yes, and that documentation or discussion is one of those times they disagree repeatedly. And if it's in the sidebar, that's an efficient one that can be referenced (like you suggested). If anything, it more easily filters out those unlistening bad faith ones by just saying "Read the link in rule 1" and seeing if they even read it. When these people are arriving in large numbers, that efficiency goes a decent way to prevent burnout.

It’s rarely something that happens by reading some rules or having one discussion, so the user is getting banned in the meantime anyways lol.

Oh of course, they're getting banned regardless lmao

TheOubliette,

Like you said, most people recognize that glorifying Nazism is wrong.

Most people will say this at a surface level, which is where I expected folks to have engagement with the sentence in question. But the next one or two clarify this: obviously this is not a deeply-held or coherent position because I’ve seen an incredible number of sonnenrad tats and symbols on people actively getting glorified in Western media with zero popular pushback. This is particularly relevant to this discussion, as the apologetics involved there also center around orientalist tropes, a nationalistic, xenophobic, racist fervor, and the amplification of these tendencies through coordinated propaganda networks (the same ones, in fact).

Most of the people coming to lemmy.ml don’t recognize that calling PRC an genocidal authoritarian dictatorship is wrong.

Yeah of course. Most xenophobes and racists think their xenophobia and racism is actually very good. And like you’ve mentioned, they often rationalize it in such a shallow way that they don’t actively label it as xenophobia or racism.

Even among people who consider nationalism, xenophobia and racism to be wrong.

Or at least, in theory, at some surface level. It often takes very little for those same people to be outwardly bloodthirsty, nationalist, xenophobic, and racist. Most are just averse to the negative connotations of being labeled as such and don’t self-criticize. This means they can be shamed and policed, not that they are just authentic smol beans that don’t need hard line treatment.

People who have Nazi tattoos know what they are doing, and know why they are being ostracized. So this is why I emphasise that finding ways to systematically hint out that orientalism IS xenophobic and not just “stating the objective facts”, is important.

I’d agree that the communication is important but I think it needs to be a blunt and forceful hard line response. And I think, “you were banned for orientalism” is sufficiently explanatory. If they don’t care enough to read for 10 minutes and figure it out, they’re very unlikely to respond well to an explanation accompanying the message. In fact they’re more likely to try to debate it. Such folks need cognitive dissonance and time to ever have a positive response.

Also, these folks are not quite so innocent. There are very real and authentically believed aspects of white supremacy in what they’re doing, they just aren’t used to having it policed or using that label. It’s the “acceptable” forms they get to have fun with on Reddit. The change in norms is going to be a surprise for them regardless of whether you add two more sentences to a sidebar or ban message.

I guess I can imagine one other benefit, though: when they inevitably screenshot their ban message and whine in a more white supremacist safe space, it will be easier to make fun of them.

If anything, it more easily filters out those unlistening bad faith ones by just saying “Read the link in rule 1” and seeing if they even read it.

IMO the filter is exactly as easy either way. They either comply or they don’t. They’ll either seek knowledge/shut up about it or they’ll throw a pity party. Either way the correct first step has been taken by the mods.

100% on the value for mods avoiding burnout, though! That is super important for handling this flood of new users. The mods are incredibly patient and deserve some help.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Thanks for bringing sensibleness in here. I absolutely hate what OP has encouraged here. I also hate how normalised hatred is among Anglo nationalists towards rest of the world.

Rentlar,

This is a teachable moment for Lemmy users, and Lemmy itself as a whole.

I'm not here to judge anyone's opinions but to clearly state the facts. And the fact is: at least one of the admins of the largest lemmy server considers anti-CCP/Russia sentiment/argument to be harmful and worthy of a ban. That is their decision.

Thus, anyone who disagrees with that, would best move to another server if they wish to discuss those opinions. A worldnews sublemmy on another server such as lemmy.one can be the place where anti-CCP and anti-Russia attitudes are not considered harmful, possibly encouraged at lemmy.one admins and mods' discretion.

This probably will not affect apolitical areas like lemmy.ml/c/pokemon for the most part. However as annoying as this situation is for some, this is why federation is a great thing. Otherwise all of Lemmy would be under rule of admins with these opinions.

hanabatake,

A worldnews sublemmy on another server such as lemmy.one can be the place where anti-CCP and anti-Russia attitudes are not considered harmful, possibly encouraged at lemmy.one admins and mods’ discretion.

I think that beehaw's news community is the place to do so

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

The instance where downvotes are disabled and all the liberal fashies are migrating to? Wow, no surprise it will be tolerant of xenophobia.

hanabatake,

Well, reddit liberals will be better over there, wouldn’t they ?

I prefer lemmy.ml to stay a leftist instance

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Discouraging discourse and media literacy regarding leftism is something most of you are ending up doing.

hanabatake,

You’re right. I will stop recommending other instances

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

I know what you are doing, so you can stop pretending to be the yesman and instead stop engaging with me, if this is going to be your way of life. Have a good life.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

hanabatake,

Now, when I joined, I was somewhat taken aback by the sheer amount of propaganda on Lemmy in general, and the somewhat belligerent attitude of some users.

With the new users it should change to be more centrist and we should see less and less this kind of post as they will get downvoted

Sphere,

God forbid it becomes "centrist." This is not your space; go make your own centrist instance if that's what you want; you have no right to dictate the nature of this one just because you're here. This space was set up by communists to be communist.

Can't wait until Hexbear federates here and libs stop trying to take over.

pistachio,

c/pokemon shouldn't be here then

JasSmith,

This space was set up by communists to be communist.

Was it? Seriously question. That wasn't made clear to me when I signed up. I never would have signed up had I read that. I suspect the intensity of your views and those of the owner of this instance differ somewhat.

god,
@god@sh.itjust.works avatar

You would be wrong. Research who owns it, look at their profile picture and you’ll know in an instant lmao. Just head to the github repo and you’ll see.

hanabatake,

This is not your space;

Wtf ? Keep it cool man. I joined like one year ago, when it was still labeled as a leftist instance. So I'm okay with it being leftist

A community of privacy and FOSS enthusiasts, run by Lemmy’s developers

However, it is not labeled as such in the sidebar anymore. So, I thought it was going to become a more generalist instance. If not, we should recommend beehaw.org

Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.

Also, it is against rule 2 to be that exclusive.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Beehaw disables downvoting and tolerates xenophobia. Does not look like a civilised instance to me, or a good generalised instance.

hanabatake,

tolerates xenophobia

I didn’t know this :(

buxtonwater,

That’s because it doesn’t, the dude is talking out his ass.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

LOL gtfo liberals, go be a xenophobe elsewhere. Go to sopuli, Finnish admin is pro NATO racist and a Russophobe, I bet you will like the vibes there.

flibbertigibbet,

The thing I find wild here is that this presumably Marxist mod is banning criticism of 2023 Russia and China. Russia in 2023 is straight up fascist and China while with more communist dressing is also a capitalist hellscape - like most of the world.

hanabatake,

Yeah, support to Russia makes no sense to me. And comparing NATO expansion with Russian try to expand with the war in Ukraine is a really bad take imo

China while with more communist dressing is also a capitalist hellscape

Well, they did a pretty good job at developing their country and capitalists have way less power than in the US or Europe for example.

If you compare it to India, the difference is flagrant. In 1990, they had a similar GDP per capita ppp (source). Now it is 3 times higher. They also take serious actions against poverty according to world bank (source)

However, the ban are clearly excessive. People should be allowed to denounce what happen in Xinjiang and Tibet

GarbageShootAlt2,

China while with more communist dressing is also a capitalist hellscape - like most of the world.

The Chinese economy is still populated in large proportion by private markets, but that doesn't mean it's the same as the rest of the world. I think it's a pat little excuse to not investigate things further just like how to dumb reactionaries China is just "authoritarian communist". It's like how radlibs will tell you the USSR was antisemitic while the far right both of the time and today will tell you it was controlled by Jews, the real goal isn't to advance a specific thesis but to serve a range of theses to a range of people that pit them against an enemy of western imperialism.

rothaine,
TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar
comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

Poor ban reason is absolutely a major issue, and unfortunately not a new one.

While some of those posts actually do deserve bans under existing rules, even those are very poorly done.

The last example correctly cites a clear violation of "[Global] Rule 2" in the deletion, albeit confusingly not mentioning Global and a flimsy citation of Rule 1, and also gives a justified and appropriate 1d ban for [global] Rule 2. But even so, this is confusing when there are global rules and community rules. So staff should make an effort to mention whether the rule they enforced was global.

Another example of a justified but poorly given ban was this recent one. It's a clear global rule 2 violation, but the reason "not nice" comes off as if no rule was broken, they just didn't like the post. Ideally, it would be something like "Global Rule 2: Disrespectful"

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/31b129ed-7dda-4f12-9196-9c40cd30d33b.png

Unfortunately it's hard to know who is responsible due to the username redactions in the modlog by default (is it an individual rogue moderator, or accepted staff policy?) and therefore harder to resolve. Tagging @dessalines and @nutomic, because this is a systematic issue that potentially affects the global staff, with significant negative impacts.

While I know there may be more pressing development issues, I think it would be excellent to add to the roadmap a feature for instance staff and community staff to write a list of rules, and have them as selectable options in the ban reason/length form. This will incentivize staff to give descriptive, valid and more consistent bans and deletions, which don't give the impression of arbitrary and personal deletions.

dessalines,

While some of those posts actually do deserve bans under existing rules, even those are very poorly done.

Those posts / comments were reported and removed for orientalism, which is breaking rule #1. If you would have left those posts stay on your instance, that's fine! We're not demanding that you moderate according to our standards.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

Well, I think (since it's a common offense and not one a typical newcomer will understand as 'racism' or 'bigotry' in typical western discourse) I think it would be helpful to add the word "orientalism", maybe even with a link to an explanation, in the rules.

While it may be obvious to us, I think it's reasonably expected that a new reddit-refugee wouldn't understand that. It would prevent avoidable drama, lowering mod workload.

My objection isn't the actual decision to take those posts down, it's that the ban message leaves a typical user guessing and the rules can make it more clear to newcomers what not to do.

dessalines,

We could add an explicit no orientalism to rule 1 I suppose, although to me its pretty clear that orientalism falls under racism.

14specks,
@14specks@lemmy.ml avatar

I think a lot of us agree with you, but it's a potentially missed opportunity to educate those who are oblivious is all.

TheOubliette,

Having posts removed with reasons given is education. It looks more like it's an unwelcone lesson, which isn't the fault of this instance. This site should not tolerate xenophobia just because Redditors build and embrace it.

Also anyone banned can just leatmrn the lesson and make a new account.

Parsnip8904,
@Parsnip8904@beehaw.org avatar

Hey I saw your reply and I couldn't really grasp how this would be so I want to engage in dialogue, feel free to ignore this if you don't want. I'm not looking for a fight.

I was on reddit when the bulk of HK protests and the crackdown happened. There were many people posting about their own government treated them brutally and violently to suppress the protests. What has struck with me was the story of a person who was lured to the railway station, forcibly taken on a train to the mainland and beaten until he agreed to sign a confession. Do you think these people sharing those experiences or sharing news articles highlighting their plight are somehow racist?

Now, I'm not a white person, neither am I Chinese. However my grandfather has undergone similar experience as a young person when he tried to protest against authoritarian actions of the government in our country. This makes me perhaps more empathetic to plight of people sharing their experiences from HK and sometimes I share this with others? Does that make me racist/orientalist?

Lastly, I've known a handful of people from China of which most were extremely nice and hospitable to me. Many of them are my friends. After seeing struggles they face under this government and their past experiences, I honestly want them to be able to live under a system where they suffer less. I really have nothing against people of China. They're amazing. That doesn't extend to whatever government they might live under.

dessalines,

I appreciate your response, and I understand that seeing that content on western-controlled media platforms like reddit, can be very jarring.

I maintiain many megathreads on these topics, but I'm convinced they'd be met with a negative reaction. People just do not tolerate anything positive being said about China. They've been inundated with a constant flow of anti-China atrocity propaganda from the western media giants, every single day, for years, in a way that warps their perspective, in the same way that some of my older family members have been made increasingly more racist by fox news.

It took me many years of being lied to consistently, growing up in the US during its wars on Iraq and the peoples of the middle east, to question the source, and subject everything that comes from these platforms with a high degree of scrutiny, especially when the US is the one doing the demonizing.

JasBC,
@JasBC@beehaw.org avatar

I appreciate your response, and I understand that seeing that content on western-controlled media platforms like reddit, can be very jarring.

You don't really no. How much "appreciation" really goes into not adressing the meat of their comment? But instead attacking the fact that oppressed Chinese turn to international forums to voice their grievences? Your "appreciation" is hollow; valueless.

People just do not tolerate anything positive being said about China.

Look up any content on Chinese electric vehicles, the country's investments in renewable energy, or even the tit-for-that trade war in semiconductors with the US, and tell me that is true. Claiming people "can't tolerate anything positive being said about China" is nothing more than hyperbolic FUD, and it's especially disengenious to claim that in response to a question specifically about how the experiences of Chinese oppression elicits posts from outsiders, many of whom have themselves been oppressed and feel comraderie with Hong Kongers or the Uyghurs.

Again, you're not actually adressing their question - is it "orientalism" to comment in opposition to the CCP's oppression on Lemmy.ml or not?

They've been inundated with a constant flow of anti-China atrocity propaganda from the western media giants, every single day, for years, in a way that warps their perspective, in the same way that some of my older family members have been made increasingly more racist by fox news.

China turned a loitering couple being thrown out of a hotel while on vacation into a diplomatic incident with my country, and then attacked, among other things, media freedoms (a fundamental right here) when a satire "news show" (think Last Week Tonight) covered the fact that China's ambassador demanded an apology from the government over it and had threatened "major consequences" if we didn't meet their demands.

China's behaviour needs no crooked lens to make people dislike it, even without taking into account whatever the CCP is doing at home.

It took me many years of being lied to consistently, growing up in the US during its wars on Iraq and the peoples of the middle east, to question the source, and subject everything that comes from these platforms with a high degree of scrutiny, especially when the US is the one doing the demonizing.

Again - you are not answering their question!

Parsnip8904,
@Parsnip8904@beehaw.org avatar

Hey, thank you for responding to the above comment. It is a topic close to me and seeing how the response indicated they hadn't really heard anything I had to say, I felt like I couldn't really reply at that point except to fight and I wasn't in a place to do that.

GarbageShootAlt2,

With due respect, "I hate China's government, not its people" is a statement so common it could be the default signature on most subreddits involving Chinese geopolitics, so at that point I struggle to blame him for his eyes glazing over a bit, especially since you spoke so nebulously about "hardship" rather than specific problems your friends might have faced, which provides very little to engage with. Just something to consider in the future, I guess.

I'm curious if you have more information on the person who was beaten into signing a confession.

IcedCoffeeBitch,

Forgive me if I misunderstood, are you implying OP's friends and other first hand accounts were influenced by the US media?

Parsnip8904,
@Parsnip8904@beehaw.org avatar

Hey! Thank you for calling out what they said. I had decided to not respond given that I felt I couldn't really engage in a dialogue after reading that.

pleasemakesense,

So a thought I had, does this kind of reasoning extend to western sources talking about western issues? I think a lot of people would agree on the principle of scepticism towards sources originating from places with a completely different political climate, so extending that to include many different political leanings and not only orientalism, would be a lot easier for people to stomach. As I said, just a thought

CriticalResist8,
@CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml avatar

I believe the log entry you shared comes from a beehaw moderator, as the comment was made on one of their communities and I know they sometimes remove comments or ban people with this reason.

The moderation log is shared across all federated instances. I.e. since Lemmy.ml federates with beehaw, they both contain each other's entries. It's a bit confusing and I'm not sure why this feature was added, it didn't use to work like that lol. But it wasn't a removal done by the lemmy.ml team.

GarbageShootAlt2,

I doubt it was intentional but it's hilarious that they criticized lemmy's moderation with a mod action done on fucking beehaw.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

Hey, look, my comment was removed.

Want to bet that the prior comment calling me a fascist and (weirdly) monarchist (which, ??) for being critical of the Chinese State is still there?

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Keep baiting and weaseling, it will not work.

gnuhaut,

"orientalism"—meaning, as I understand it, the depiction or discussion of Asian cultures by people in Western ones

That's not what is meant here.

Since the publication of Edward Said's Orientalism in 1978, much academic discourse has begun to use the term "Orientalism" to refer to a general patronizing Western attitude towards Middle Eastern, Asian, and North African societies.

So this would fall under the "no bigotry" rule.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

Being critical of a totalitarian and Imperialist ethnostate - by which I mean the Chinese state - is not bigotry.

dessalines,

Do you know what the most common profession for members of the NPC, the national people's congress, the main governing body of the PRC, is? Industrial engineer

Guess what the most common profession is for liberal democracies? Lawyers.

I don't say this because I don't like lawyers 🤣 , I have one in the family. I say it only to point out that most of what you've learned about China, is coming through a heavy media filter, from a media who only seeks to demonize a country they're in a trade war with.

pineapple,

Do you know what the most common profession for members of the NPC, the national people's congress, the main governing body of the PRC, is? Industrial engineer

Guess what the most common profession is for liberal democracies? Lawyers.

I don't say this because I don't like lawyers 🤣 , I have one in the family. I say it only to point out that most of what you've learned about China, is coming through a heavy media filter, from a media who only seeks to demonize a country they're in a trade war with.

I would like to step outside of the argument about people's perceptions of China here, to point out that this is a matter of communication, not ideology. You have seen for yourself how there are commenters here who the rules were not clearly communicated to, because in their use of language they do not understand the terms bigotry or racism to include orientalism.

This has been stated very succinctly in the comment that you responded to:

Being critical of a totalitarian and Imperialist ethnostate - by which I mean the Chinese state - is not bigotry.

Please step outside of the ideology of it and understand that this is not about whether orientalism can be considered bigotry. The issue is that if you list bigotry and racism without also explicitly listing orientalism, then there are people who will misunderstand and they will be upset when they are subject to rules that they don't understand. You may persuade this one commenter, but you cannot persuade every unknown reader who happens upon lemmy.ml and sees the rules to assume that bigotry must include orientalism. You must speak to people in a language that they can understand, or there is no point in speaking at all.

I am afraid that this misunderstanding is a big problem waiting to happen when a crowd of redditors—most of whom I think are very likely not to have the same understanding of the rules as written as you do—come to the platform, and then feel offended and surprised when they find themselves subject to rules that were not clearly communicated to them. It is important that people understand the rules that they are expected to follow.

I am not asking that orientalism be included explicitly in the rules because of any ideological position on whether or not orientalism should be implied by the terms already there. I am asking because I think it is important that the rules be communicated in a way that people can understand, and the responses to this post are very clear evidence that people have not understood.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

Actually, a lot of what I've learned about China comes from books written by Chinese people and scholars.

Since you're engaging with me, I'll ask you.

Is there a genocide in Xinjiang? I'm ready to hear your evasion and denials.

gnuhaut,

Do you expect people to waste their time debunking your shit when you're not willing to form an argument other than "I read this somewhere trust me"?

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar
dessalines,

Most of the world disagrees with you, especially the middle east:

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/f0502e30-05e9-443a-969c-9ab31441fadf.jpeg

Are what those countries saying untrustworthy?

Outsider7542,

A map like that isn't really reflective of any substance. Do you know what most maps of the US look like when defining political opinions by states? It's a sea of red. But it clearly doesn't tell a valid picture of popular support. And I'm not even arguing that makes any particular opinion more valid or not, all I'm saying is that its very easily misleading depending on what narrative you want to sell.

https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/E7LSY66ODVCFHEVJ7TTGJKPHSU.jpg

Clearly the vast majority of the country supported Trump based on that map...Except that's not true.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Are you dismissing information about plight of Uyghur Muslims even though Muslim countries of the world found no issue with it? How does majority of the world support Trump with that map, and why are you distorting and misrepresenting information to armtwist the narrativr?

Outsider7542,

Are you being inflammatory and intentionally framing my post to make it seem like I made statements that I didn’t make? What I refuted is that posting a simple map that appears to tell a definitive story isn’t actually very substantial because there are many ways in which it can be misleading.

Let’s first address the most obvious error in your comment. You said that I claimed “majority of the world support trump with that map”, and my comment clearly says “country”, not world.

My point is that placing colors on a map can mean anything depending on how you frame the context or what you understand about what geographically is being depicted in the map. I used a map of the US as an example of how colors on a map can be misleading. The vast majority of that map is red, which would lead you to believe that in a lens where red/blue represent two different political parties, would have you believe the red party has drastically more support than the blue party.

Now that is one way that a map with simplistic information shown can be misleading, but there are other ways to use them to be misleading. For example, the very map that Dessalines posts, why is it that nearly all the Western countries are unified in a certain perspective of China? Are you going to say because of US influence? It would be fair to refute that a bunch of independent developed Western nations have each come to a similar conclusion about China if you claimed that there was a lack of independence to them coming to that conclusion. At the same time, couldn’t that argument also be made about China and other nations within the sphere of influence of China?

Also you’re using a fallacious defense that Muslim countries are somehow more authoritative in source because the alleged victims of abuse are Muslim, as though no collective of people have ever hurt people that have identified similarly of that collective before. Wasn’t there violence between different denominations of Christians? Isn’t there violence between different beliefs among Muslims? There’s a laundry list of abuses humans have committed against each other and against people that identify similar to each other, and it’s often because there ends up being a deep difference of opinion on specific issues. So generalizing that all Muslim countries will support all Muslims in all cases is bigotry on your part.

Link,
@Link@lemmy.ml avatar

I say it only to point out that most of what you’ve learned about China, is coming through a heavy media filter, from a media who only seeks to demonize a country they’re in a trade war with.

Most of the world disagrees with you, especially the middle east

China is an important and powerful trading partner to many countries, so there is an incentive not to speak up. If you are skeptical about the western media, I think you should also be skeptical about the stance of these governments.

To me the situation in Xinjiang is very concerning because humanitarian organizations like Amnesty International speak out against the treatment of Uygurs. I think they don't have a reason to turn a blind eye like many of these governments do. And quite a few of them don't seem to be bothered by human rights violations, violating them themselves in horrific ways. Looking at you, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Syria etc.

Again, I agree that the west has a political motive to slander China. And the west also does and has done horrible things. But I don't think the same goes for humanitarian organizations.

dessalines,

A lot of these western "humanitarian / rights" orgs, came out of the cold war, as part of an active effort to carry out regime change against socialist states and stop the spread of communism. Amnesty international for example was co-founded by someone who worked for british intelligence, and its other founder had close links to the FBI, and even had a hand in the FBI killing of Fred Hampton.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/amnesty-international-troubling-collaboration-with-uk-us-intelligence/253939/

I trust what Muslim and global south countries, as well as the Uyghur people themselves have to say about their treatment, and not these western "human-rights-complex" orgs hailing from countries who have done nothing but bomb the middle east for 60+ years.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

DengueDucky,

I think you're being downvoted because the general belief here is that reeducation isn't happening and that there is no solid evidence that it is. I'm also not very knowledgeable here though, so take this with a grain of salt.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

GarbageShootAlt2,

The downvotes are from you seemingly maliciously misinterpreting the point, specifically that it was the people in re-education that are glad they are there and not what was actually said, that the global Muslim population seems to largely support the re-education. By its very nature, we would expect very few people to be glad they are there -- especially while they are there -- but we would expect many Uighurs in the region to be glad that those people are re-educated, as the broader population of Uighurs in the region are the main group victimized by the many terrorist attacks that this crackdown was in response to. That is to say nothing of what Muslims elsewhere in the world think and why because I don't understand that topic enough.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

GarbageShootAlt2,

Alright, it could just be poor reading comprehension. Sorry for assuming.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

GarbageShootAlt2,

the Chinese government especially isn’t renown to be tender

You were just explaining about the saturation of bias and then you retreated back to vibes. Those vibes came from somewhere.

the hard line is if people were killed, families destroyed, and/or people traumatized.

"Trauma" can be a rather hard thing to define, but I agree in any case that these would all be serious problems. In fact, these things have been serious problems in the terror attacks that incited the program. Some of those attacks had extreme levels of fatality and they overwhelmingly targeted normal citizens (and not, say, police stations or military bases or government buildings). The cost of action is important to consider, but so is the cost of inaction.

In the program itself, people weren't killed unless you count return fire during those terror attacks. To call families "destroyed" when these were all temporary interventions that allowed maintained family contact (and usually returning home on weekends) would be a contortion. "Trauma" is something that will always be produced from a large-scale program in one way or another, and could thereby be used to condemn virtually any program if you leave it merely as "was anyone traumatized?" Trauma should be minimized, but variance exists. To use the most benign possible example as a starting point, a kid who loves his father [who is unrelatedly a Jihadist] is probably going to feel pretty shitty if that father is taken away from him for two years, but that does not mean his life will experience a net negative when you factor in his father returning to him after being rehabilitated from militant Salafism.

Just things to consider.

I can see what you're saying with the last part about timing. Given that concern:

Dessalines, along with around 5 other contributors, maintains a collection of sources on various topics, and Xinjiang is among them. That could be one way of investigating his stance on the topic and information he finds relevant (though idk which parts are his versus the other contributors')

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

GarbageShootAlt2,

I haven't read that part because the "didn't communism fail?" bugbear is a cold war relic, but looking at the very first link in that subsection, I believe it's a matter of poor formatting, since it does address the achievements of the USSR starting with this paragraph (so you can ctrl+f):

Examples from this post by /u/bayarea415, Stephen Gowans - Do publicly owned, planned economies work, Ian Goodrum - Socialism vs Capitalism and quality of life, and yogthos's USSR acheivements post about the USSR specifically:

And gives a bullet-pointed list of linked topics, e.g.:

USSR had a more nutritious diet than the US, according to the CIA. Calories consumed surpassed the US. source. Ended famines.

Had the 2nd fastest growing economy of the 20th century after Japan. The USSR started out at the same level of economic development and population as Brazil in 1920, which makes comparisons to the US, an already industrialized country by the 1920s, even more spectacular.

etc., typically with one or two links per bullet-point.

I can forgive him that much because there is a huge amount of information one needs to organize in order to even begin to address the endlessly litany of (often totally baseless) accusations that get so casually thrown at communists.

Edit: Also, this is just the first link. Skipping the second because it is Reddit, the second is the bullet point:

Do Publicly Owned, Planned Economies Work?, audiobook

Which is what it says on the tin:

The Soviet Union was a concrete example of what a publicly owned, planned economy could produce: full employment, guaranteed pensions, paid maternity leave, limits on working hours, free healthcare and education (including higher education), subsidized vacations, inexpensive housing, low-cost childcare, subsidized public transportation, and rough income equality. Most of us want these benefits. However, are they achievable permanently? It is widely believed that while the Soviet Union may have produced these benefits, in the end, Soviet public ownership and planning proved to be unworkable. Otherwise, how to account for the country’s demise? Yet, when the Soviet economy was publicly owned and planned, from 1928 to 1989, it reliably expanded from year to year, except during the war years.

And it goes on at length, hence being paired with an "audiobook" version. It does bring up capitalism because such comparison is inevitable (and, I believe, quite necessary), but it is more focused on the topic of your interest, as the title indicates.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGQeF62zdCc

Come back after 90 minutes of learning facts about this topic. Also, your wink in the edit is really giving you away.

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Edit: this video seems to be targeted at americans. Which I am not. I am not interested into watching a video to learn things from a context I do not have.

You do not need to be an American citizen to be culturally American. You could be culturally Westernised even if you lived in Indonesia or Pakistan. This video is not targeted at Americans, but anyone who believes in Uyghur genocide propaganda wholly funded and invented by CIA to attempt a Mujahideen 2.0 insurrection in North-West China.

If you think that is too much, here is something that will be an eye opener, a CIA head's AMA. https://web.archive.org/web/20200924183937/https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/hwi7ub/i_am_sophie_richardson_china_director_at_human/

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

abraxas,

In fairness, before I walked onto Tiananmen Square when visiting China, my local guide strongly implied that we should not mention anything but weddings or vacation spots (no massacre) if we didn't want to be arrested.

Being there was surreal and terrifying. Police with shotguns everywhere. The level of authoritative oppression is worse than visiting a small town in the South.

The "heavy media filter" represents exactly what I experienced as a young&dumb tourist who didn't know about any media filter in the first place.

EDIT: More info. Every time I walked past banks, or any possibly-questionable spot... police/soldiers with shotguns. Sure it's a culture difference, but I live in the most gun-friendly country in the world and their authorities walk around packing heavy weapons. And the complete lack of public protest was noticable and staggering. All I have to do in the US to see protest is drive down any highway. In China? Nothing.

EDIT2: And hey. I've worked with dozens of Chinese expats. You know what they all have in common? They would never live in China again. Mostly because of how oppressive they feel the government is. A lot of coworkers were "rural Chinese" and were second-class citizens behind the "urban Chinese" (confirmed by expats from the latter who were friends/coworkers with the former). The former had a passport that excluded them from entering cities because they weren't "good enough". The latter had passports to go anywhere.

BunkerBusterKeaton,

China has 1.4 billion people. Do you really think they have the ability and/or need to “squash” protests and prevent any protest from ever happening? No. They have a healthy democracy where people are involved in voicing their opinions, and protesting if it ever comes to that. Please stop ingesting so much xenophobic propaganda and learn more about the countries of which you speak

gnuhaut,

I read about protests in China all the time.

So I just skimmed English Wikipedia (hardly a neutral source), and they say:

The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s, from approximately 8,700 "mass group incidents" in 1993[1] to over 87,000 in 2005.[2] In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010.[3][4] Mass incidents are defined broadly as "planned or impromptu gathering that forms because of internal contradictions", and can include public speeches or demonstrations, physical clashes, public airings of grievances, and other group behaviors that are seen as disrupting social stability.[5]

This does not at all sound like there are no protests.

abraxas,

Your response is fair, but I want to clarify my point. It was not to say that China is a terrible country or that my personal experience covers every inch of the largest country in the world.

It was to reject the idea that there is some "media heavy filter". The media represents what its viewers would experience with zero media intervention by visiting Beijing, or Shamien. Or (from expats' experience) hundreds of other parts of China.

And as to that, I feel I was able to hit a bullseye with that point, that is not really influenced by your response regarding protests against or in China.

Whatever filter the media is portraying is an accurate shapshot of the country, if not a complete one. I knew a single re-pat to China, and she was happy there. She could not, however, tell me that any of my concerns or experiences were invalid.

EDIT: And with all due respect, I would like to point out to readers that your post history involves accusing the West of trying to use propaganda to make everyone hate China so we can go to war with them. We can all have the opinions we have, but I feel that is a bit tinfoil extreme and not merely a "voice of reason" response like you present here.

If anything "this is what I saw when I was there" is a voice of "foreign reason" that can be taken or left.

EDIT2: (Can't stop editing). I'd like to reference you to a very wise person who said:

"Do you expect people to waste their time debunking your shit when you’re not willing to form an argument other than “I read this somewhere trust me”?" His name? @gnuhaut

gnuhaut,

So you cite me when I respond to a guy who just said he knows shit because he reads a lot and that's it, when I responded to your comment with an actual source? Do you think that's some great own?

abraxas,

I cited that you implied reading shit was not knowledge. Maybe it was a bit flippant of me, but you did quite literally try to invdalite my entire experience by quoting a random block of wikipedia about protests.

But I'm not here to argue. I gave my own experience. I am ready to move on.

gnuhaut,

I implied just saying "I read a lot" is no way to bolster an argument.

I also did not "invalidate your entire experience". I just pointed out that your experience of not seeing protests might not be representative. I didn't say anything about your other points.

SturgiesYrFase,

Just wanted to point out, China is the fourth largest country in the world, behind Russia(1) Canada(2) and the USA(3)

abraxas,

Largest country by population :) But importantly, I think one could argue that China is culturally the largest country as well.

That said, where do you find USA(3)? China comes in third for landmass here.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

India overtook China in terms of population numbers. Just wanted to correct that.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

There absolutely are protests in China, they happen, and this is a true fact. Until recently, it was broadly observed that such anger was directed generally at local officials and not at the CCP regime itself.

Recently, though, protests asking the CCP regime to resign have been seen. Which previously was unprecedented.

The fact that protests do happen and occasionally are tolerated in China does absolutely nothing to take away from the point that China is an authoritarian Police State. The Chinese Constitution is not respected within China.

GarbageShootAlt2,

The fact that protests do happen and occasionally are tolerated in China

Literally just inventing statistics about protests being suppressed.

During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

. . .What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

-- Some guy, emphasis mine

GarbageShootAlt2,

Calling China an ethnostate is ridiculous when we have hard examples like Israel and soft examples like Japan to compare it to.

gnuhaut,

China is not totalitarian nor an ethnostate, and the imperialism allegation is debatable.

sixdix,

Just say the following statement and it will prove you correct.

I Denounce the terrible treatment Xi Jing Ping has inflicted upon the Uyghurs Muslims. Slavery and concentration camps in China are wrong and not ok.

If you cannot say this, you have proven China is both totalitarian and a ethno state.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

Xi's policies are reintroducing Totalitarian politics into the Chinese mainstream. The State is run as an ethno-state of the Han, as exemplified by Chinesification policies applied to Colonial regions like Tibet and Xinjiang.

And China used force, violence to acquire the ethnically, culturally and linguistically distinct territories of Xinjiang and Tibet. It then carries out, to this day, genocidal efforts to destroy these indigenous cultures and subjugate them to Chinese, Han and State-Approved ideals.

From where I'm sitting, there is no good-faith argument to be made that the Chinese state is not Imperialist. If Russia's borders are founded on Imperialism, and if America's are, then so is China's.

gnuhaut,

You're just asserting stuff. What is stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

sarsaparilyptus,
CrimsonOnoscopy,

It's absurd to pretend as if the evidence for violent imposition of Chinese state policies in Xinjiang and Tibet isn't overwhelming.

And before you ask, yes, Western states are also violent and this is also a bad thing.

GarbageShootAlt2,

I love it when people disavow states like the US while exactly mirroring what those states say about their enemies. Would you like to share with me some of that "overwhelming evidence" about their "violent imposition" on Tibet, especially in the current day? I'm sure you have lots of links about the poor wholesome slaver theocrats they drove out, but I've seen that stuff before.

gnuhaut,

I don't think you know what ethnostate means.

TheOubliette,

China is none of the above outside of a definition of imperialism I think most of the newcomers here, and certainly anyone making those claims, would be unfamiliar with.

The combination of those claims suggests a highly xenophobic sourcing that has little to do with understanding China and a lot to do with a new cold war mentality that exploits Western, and particularly American, ignorance of other countries, e.g. being successfully targeted by the Western-facing Radio Free Asia government-affiliated media and/or the related complex of think tanks and hacks that get mileage not because they're well-grounded in knowledge or academic work, but because they vilify the new "enemy". This is in no way new and Westerners never seem to acquire generational skepticism, instead always getting duped into the intended hatefest, even while acknowledging they got the last ones wrong (e.g. Iraq, Afghanistan).

Those claims are also highly projecting, as many do describe many Western/ally countries and cynically draw from a misuse of the language of the left.

Imperialism, particularly as an accusation like this, is about the forcible export of capital such that capitalist exploitation becomes transnational, witg structurally underpaid labor being extracted from one country to the one exporting capital. This is closely tied to the colonialism of Europe and America, but also applies to "inter-imperialist" conflicts. China lacks the apparatus to coerce, an apparatus that absolutely is used by the US and its clients to vilify and destroy countries not falling in line, as well as accept IMF terms that neoliberalize their economies. Rather, the left critique of China on this is more often that its survival strategy (which is working) requires the exploitation of its own labor and the import of capital. Luckily, this is changing.

China is simply not an ethnostate, this is pure projection and orientalism. Chins is an explicitly multi-ethnic country snd has widespread state support for ethnic diversify and what would be described by Westerners as affirmative action programs that are more generous and effective than Western ones. Attempts to pretend that being Han is akin to whiteness are absurd and, in addition to mischaracteeizing China, bely a problematic ignorance of how white suoremacy was invented, and why it had to be invented, as those histories don't apply to the Han in China. The simplified version is: it's a condition of racialized labor divisions to feed capitalism and particularly European colonialism, and in the US, settler-colonialism. You can find a modern ethnostate in Israel, a Western forward base and settler-colonial project engaging in apartheid.

Re: totalitarian, this term means very little as an accusation and is so overused and selectively justified that in this context all one can really infer it to mean is "bad". Often, it relies on a false consciousness of coercion or societal violence that arbitrarily vilifies state violence while tolerating the private violence ubiquitous in countries dominated by the capitalist class. Example: it is "totalitarian" for there to be government censors on certain topics in [bad country], but not totalitarian for stories supportive of ruling class interests to be favored by privately-owned media (i.e. the dominant media in the West) and for those perceived as a threat to those interests to be systematically downplayed, unfunded in the first place, selectively misrepresented, and coopted and misdirected. Anyone active in, say, the George Floyd protests got to watch the lying happen in real time, with the cop-and-pricate-property-friendly "uncensored" media playing the lead role. Lazy accusations of totalitarianism are really just dog whistles for unexamined hypocrisy and a lack of awareness of the ubiquity of social violence.

dessalines,

This is the case, yes. Orientalism is the condescending and patronizing attitude (think rudyard kipling) many westerners (especially those from the US, who have been pumped full of sinophobia non-stop since the trade war began) towards other peoples they view as inferior. Anything from a Middle-eastern, Chinese, Indian, or Russian source is seen as illegitimate, evil, sinister, "authoritarian", whereas anything from a western source is seen as cultured, measured, dignified, etc. Its 100% an instance of breaking rule 1: no bigotry, and alienates most of the people on the planet.

Side point, but I was watching a documentary from 2011 (I think inside job? about the 2008 financial crisis), before the trade war began, and its night and day. Not a single negative thing said about the PRC, and this was just a few years ago.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

whereas anything from a western source is seen as cultured, measured, dignified, etc.

No leftist has ever believed that, and it is a bad faith argument.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

If you are a leftist, I am Mao Zedong. Stop pretending to be a leftist while all your posting reveals you being in the other direction.

14specks,
@14specks@lemmy.ml avatar

It's not that they "believe" it, but it's a glaring blind spot that takes time to be acknowledged and contended with.

You can go out and be the biggest leftist of all and support LGBT rights, universal healthcare, whatever, but it's not like people understand every page of socialist theory and worldview on Day 1. There are many Western leftists at this early stage who have not studied topics like the Chinese Revolution (for instance) from a socialist perspective. Naturally, they are going to tend to repeat liberal talking points until they've done that.

Sure they one can be a "leftist" who is fighting for "the right thing", but for me, I know that I have grown massively in my understanding of the world (modern and historical), and continue to do so. I assuredly have blind spots of my own that I have yet to deal with.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

I'm not saying blind spots don't exist. What I was doing is calling out a genocide denier for using bad-faith arguments.

thoro,

but for me, I know that I have grown massively in my understanding of the world (modern and historical), and continue to do so. I assuredly have blind spots of my own that I have yet to deal with.

This is basically where I am. I've learned a lot in my years to see that the world is very complex and nuanced and many assumptions I had were completely baseless. I've come to the conclusion that I am far too ignorant of the history and geopolitics of the USSR/China to really feel like I have an informed opinion that isn't influenced by cold war propaganda. And I just have not had the time to rectify that yet.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

It's fine to acknowledge tat you don't have the background information.

Just trust the consensus and intersecting beliefs and analysis of professional academics and historians over internet tankies. Because one group lies more than the other, and it isn't the academics.

thoro,

Some of the very first articles I read that pushed me toward leftism were The Responsibility of Intellectuals and Manufacturing Consent. So no I'm not apt to blindly accept the consensus of academics and Western elites without looking at it as closely as I can.

14specks,
@14specks@lemmy.ml avatar

Totally, and once you get there you can and should have criticisms of both countries and how they have operated and the decisions their leaders have made. It's not that they are above criticism, but its exhausting to hear criticisms from people who obviously haven't done their homework and they let the propaganda (seated in racism/orientalism/whatever Red Scare shit) do the talking.

thoro,

but its exhausting to hear criticisms from people who obviously haven't done their homework and they let the propaganda (seated in racism/orientalism/whatever Red Scare shit) do the talking.

Yep. This is why I'm really leaning more on the side of the mods and general culture on this instance (and others) than the users flinging loaded language and spreading FUD about the platform.

14specks,
@14specks@lemmy.ml avatar

the users flinging loaded language and spreading FUD about the platform.

Extremely dorky to do that on a federated site. Set up an instance and federate.

Nobody seems to give a shit that all major social media is owned by sketchy billionaires who actually have the power to fuck shit up, but one FOSS developer is an ardent communist (but not known to be a member of any org or party where he could actually do anything (no offense)), and all of a sudden that somehow is an issue for just using the software (as intended by the dev!)

pineapple,

Extremely dorky to do that on a federated site. Set up an instance and federate.

Nobody seems to give a shit that all major social media is owned by sketchy billionaires who actually have the power to fuck shit up, but one FOSS developer is an ardent communist (but not known to be a member of any org or party where he could actually do anything (no offense)), and all of a sudden that somehow is an issue for just using the software (as intended by the dev!)

I cannot speak for anyone but myself. But as the person who wrote this post, I hope that it has not been misunderstood as criticism of anyone's politics or ideology. The developers are entitled to their opinions and beliefs.

But people are also entitled to understand what rules they are subject to, and those rules have not been communicated clearly. That point is not disputable: Read the comments on this post to find quite a few examples of people who did not understand the intention behind how the rules were written.

There is not a distinction here between failure to understand and failure to communicate. It is not constructive to blame either side. The reality is that one often must proactively attempt to communicate in a way that avoids such fundamental misunderstandings, and I think that it is in the interest of lemmy.ml's admins and all the rest of us that the instance's rules are communicated clearly.

I do not expect anyone to change their opinions or beliefs. What I think is important is that the people coming to lemmy have the rules communicated to them in language that they can understand.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

I just want to ask you. Are we expected to teach liberals, that have racism and bigotry normalised into their heads by Reddit and western media/news, how to not be a racist and bigot, when all they spout is racist and bigot arguments, and accuse the ones trying to teach them via countering the nonsense arguments as "genociders", "CCP/Putin shills", "tankies" et al? Please tell us, mighty one, how we are supposed to stop this when liberals have fingers in their ears going lalalala without listening and accepting the facts we share, without downvoting and demeaning us?

pineapple,

I just want to ask you. Are we expected to teach liberals, that have racism and bigotry normalised into their heads by Reddit and western media/news, how to not be a racist and bigot, when all they spout is racist and bigot arguments, and accuse the ones trying to teach them via countering the nonsense arguments as “genociders”, “CCP/Putin shills”, “tankies” et al? Please tell us, mighty one, how we are supposed to stop this when liberals have fingers in their ears going lalalala without listening and accepting the facts we share, without downvoting and demeaning us?

Are you so afraid of liberal downvotes and demeaning that you refuse to stand openly by your own beliefs? Do you not believe with enough conviction to even attempt to reach those who have been indoctrinated?

m532,

You act like you’re “just asking questions”, but now you’ve exposed yourself as what you really are: a bully.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Not afraid, but pissed at this delusion. No amount of explanation is going to penetrate the minds of these McCarthyism victims, because they have shut off their minds and have adopted Anglo nationalism as a means of self preservation. We try, we get called "CCP/Putin shills" "tankies" "wumao bots" "genociders" "orcs" and whatever else brainrot liberals come up with. When your political ideology teaches you to make fun of others without the need to engage, and think this is "democracy", while living a privileged gaming chair life in countries that historically colonised and exploited rest of the world, you can only keep so much patience without insulting. We are not shameless or lacking in self respect, and refuse to tolerate.

Do you seriously expect us to keep dealing with this inhuman, dishonest, anti-intellectual behaviour, be one sidedly tolerant forever? The countries you are passively protecting wish to recolonise countries (India in my case) if they had their way. And if CIA did stop us in 90s from becoming a nuclear state, we would have been recolonised easily.

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/b94e60c7-15d6-4210-853b-af2b44f97423.jpeg

Parsnip8904,
@Parsnip8904@beehaw.org avatar

Good on you for trying to find a solution in a very respectful and diplomatic manner so that everyone can gain something from this :)

I would be curious to know if the admins responsible are the actual lemmy devs or someone else administering the lemmy.ml instance.

I remember first browsing lemmy without an account on jebora and being a little bit scared by some of the content that was showing up. Which is why I ended up making an account on beehaw.

CrimsonOnoscopy,

They are the devs, based on reddit posts when the project was first getting started.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

The two founding devs run the lemmy.ml instance, along with other global admins recruited to assist in moderation. Unfortunately the modlog doesn't show which staff perform an action, so it could even be the community's own mods, or other admin/s.

Parsnip8904,
@Parsnip8904@beehaw.org avatar

Thanks. Is it not even possible for the hosters of the instance to find out who would have done it?

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

They probably can, judging by how other software handle logs. I think it's just non-public to prevent stalking and harassment, and that's a valid concern, I can say from experience in other communities. Transparency and security is often a tough balance.

blujan,

And you can see the main developer's comments in this same thread defending these actions.

Parsnip8904,
@Parsnip8904@beehaw.org avatar

Just saw that. That person was saying these comments criticizing Chinese government are racist. A statement that I'm not able to digest. If a Chinese dissident posted an article criticizing the governments actions, they would be considered racist?

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

I see no issues in banning liberal trolls, just because they want to parrot nonsense takes on the internet, and are now seeking to find a new Reddit to vomit onto. Lemmy is not going to be your Reddit 2.0, if you desire to replicate this behaviour. Learn some manners and stop the western vitrolic reactionary groupthink behaviour.

pineapple,

I see no issues in banning liberal trolls, just because they want to parrot nonsense takes on the internet, and are now seeking to find a new Reddit to vomit onto. Lemmy is not going to be your Reddit 2.0, if you desire to replicate this behaviour. Learn some manners and stop the western vitrolic reactionary groupthink behaviour.

If you read the post carefully, you may notice how I tried to make it clear that I am not arguing against the policy. I am arguing that the policy should be clearly and openly stated, so that it does not come as a surprise to anyone.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

I know what you are going for, but the aim is to make westerners with anti-communist brainwashing a little less vitriolic and a little more coerced towards reforming themselves via discussions here. People are subjected too much to Cold War McCarthyism and it has gotten to their heads to the point liberals are absolutely foaming at the mouth whenever facts about socialism are put onto the table, leading to denial of facts, screeching about blocking servers as users, calling developers and socialists literally genociders and whatnot, and so on. Lemmy developers are correct in formulating a space for discourse, which Cold War McCarthyism brainwashed Reddit refugees want to desperately avoid, exposing their own insecurities.

Your post isolates the above phenomenon entirely and presents "evidence against mods" in a vacuum, which does not exist, which is not malicious but highly ignorant on your part.

pineapple,

I know what you are going for, but the aim is to make westerners with anti-communist brainwashing a little less vitriolic and a little more coerced towards reforming themselves via discussions here. People are subjected too much to Cold War McCarthyism and it has gotten to their heads to the point liberals are absolutely foaming at the mouth whenever facts about socialism are put onto the table, leading to denial of facts, screeching about blocking servers as users, calling developers and socialists literally genociders and whatnot, and so on. Lemmy developers are correct in formulating a space for discourse, which Cold War McCarthyism brainwashed Reddit refugees want to desperately avoid, exposing their own insecurities.

Your post isolates the above phenomenon entirely and presents “evidence against mods” in a vacuum, which does not exist, which is not malicious but highly ignorant on your part.

I feel like we are having two different conversations. I broadly agree with what you've written here about the preconceptions that people have, and the value of discourse. You don't have to convince me.

The point which I wish to make here is that the admins and moderators of lemmy.ml should be clear about the rules that users are expected to follow. I presented my case that a rule is being enforced that has not been written anywhere. I have asked that the rule be written instead of unwritten. I am concerned that failing to clearly communicate rules to people before enforcing them is likely to lead to frustration and scandal as the community grows.

I understand your passion. But I feel that the point I'm trying to make is important. I have to ask that you engage with that point, instead of attacking me personally and accusing me of ignorance.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

I feel like we are having two different conversations. I broadly agree with what you’ve written here about the preconceptions that people have, and the value of discourse. You don’t have to convince me.

I have to convince you because of the comments your post has attracted. Read them, many of them stink. Are you understanding what is going on, and why discourse and methods that reduce this McCarthyist vitriol must be pushed for?

Lemmy is trying to act a bit neutral silently, but liberals are coming with this "devs and communists and lemmygrad = genociders" unhinged crap constantly since the exodus started. Plus, let us not act that the discourse is so utopian and neutral, besides vitriolic reddit refugees calling all the old users here all this shit. You cannot have one side just sucking up and allowing the constant disgusting behaviour, while the other continues to do it while refusing to listen and debate, hence justifying these bans

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

It is very hypocritical for you to critique others for "refusing to listen and debate" when you're:

  • repeatedly completely ignoring what pineapple is saying
  • dismissing their concerns of moderation practice with an irrelevant deflection that we need to keep banning liberal trolls (which pineapple has twice reconfirmed that they agree and never said otherwise), and then
  • playing guilt by association, by saying "I have to convince you because of the comments your post has attracted", which is a completely ineffective method because you're not even talking to the people who you take issue with, you're just wasting your efforts arguing at someone who never even disagreed, and keeps telling you that.
m532,

Telling a nonwestern user what to do while they are calling out orientalism? This sounds like disdain for nonwestern people to me a.k.a. racism.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

repeatedly completely ignoring what pineapple is saying

When pineapple themself are not considering western chauvinism being the reason behind the bans, not pointing out in post, it becomes a very futile exercise.

It is not guilt by association to point out a real example of western chauvinists in the very post they are complaining about moderation in. Calling it that is extremely reductionist.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

If such content should be banned, then the admins or mods should put it in the rules. Simple.

Otherwise, it is a violation of the site's stated policy and what we call "power-tripping", individuals promoting personal beliefs through site moderation abuse. There are communities like Lemmygrad which are (more) clear on what users and staff expect from each other.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

Read through below comments explaining what is going on. The more alerting issue is liberals parroting and carrying over Cold War McCarthyist nonsense from Reddit onto here, putting fingers in their ears and even refusing to listen and debate the other side, while also calling devs, communists and Lemmygrad users "genociders" and what not. Other instances' "pro-Anglo freezepeach" devs are encouraging their own beliefs by letting Cold War McCarthyism flourish, which looks like them importing Reddit's racist culture into Lemmy and Fediverse.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

This does not even acknowledge the critique of this post or my reply. You’re apparently not listening or discussing our side.

We’re not saying those new users’ attitudes aren’t an issue!

We’re also not saying that such people shouldn’t be banned!

We’re saying it’s being handled inappropriately by people who don’t apply the rules they are obliged to enforce.

In a situation, like you said, their offense isn’t “orientalism”. Their offense may be vitriolic bad-faith discussion, and if it isn’t, then the rules should be updated to align with moderation standards.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

On the other hand, things like orientalism are very much a thing. Westerners love to portray East countries in a certain demeaning manner constantly, attempting to hide their xenophobic intentions. I was constantly observing Senokir’s posting and it has been abrasive to say the least. OP is merely pointing out things without calling out the larger context inclusive of western imperialist biases. I do not think something like xenophobia or racism against East needs to be separately mentioned in rules, it should be a normal thing to assume this is unacceptable behaviour, even if racism and bigotry was normalised on Reddit.

comfy,
@comfy@lemmy.ml avatar

it should be a normal thing to assume this is unacceptable behaviour, even if racism and bigotry was normalised on Reddit.

It should be, I agree!

It isn’t a normalized thing, and the current policy of staff isn’t helping to make it normal. They have a good opportunity to teach people normalized orientalism is xenophobic, but this opportunity is squandered through their poorly-explained ban reasons and rules. Very simple steps can make it clearer to offenders that they are being chauvinistic when they (mistakenly!) think they’re being anti-racist. The way things are, they think they’re being banned “for no reason” and will just do the same thing again.

The issue is that they don’t realize their attitude is demeaning, it’s not that they think racism or xenophobia is ok, they just actually don’t understand why what they’re doing is racist or xenophobic, and so small adjustments to the rules page (such as “racism and xenophobia, including orientalism” with a link to an explaining page) would provide an up-front opportunity to explain that they are being chauvinistic and give a chance to learn.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines