Ich habe den Eindruck, das Gericht will sich für seine frühere, konsequentere Position entschuldigen. Es winkt jede Überwachungsmaßnahme durch, lediglich versehen mit marginalen "Einschränkungen", die in der Praxis kaum eine Rolle spielen.
[Nouvelle BD rendue accessible] Hadopi dans le formol
C'était en janvier 2021, et Hadopi (toujours vivante) nous ressortait une campagne de com bien claquée au sol… mais clairement pas au niveau d'Emma Leprince et du label PUR #NeverForget
#EU#France#HADOPI#Copyright#Filesharing#Privacy#DataProtection#DataRetention: "This post will argue that the HADOPI system is contrary to the Court’s extensive data retention case law on two counts. First, the HADOPI system operates by relying on automated access to traffic data, which under the Court’s current case law (discussed further below) can only be retained for the purpose of combatting serious crime. Even the AG agrees that copyright infringements clearly cannot be classified as a serious crime (para. 38 of the Opinion). Secondly, the massive access to this traffic data takes place without prior authorisation from a national court or an independent administrative authority.
In his two Opinions, AG Szpunar presents a very different analysis of the case. He concludes that the HADOPI is compatible with EU law. In doing so, he proposes a revision – in his words, a “development” (para. 30 of the second Opinion) – of the Court’s case law on data retention in the online sphere, which will have wide-ranging consequences for the privacy and data protection of everyone using the internet."