scholar_farmer, to random
@scholar_farmer@zirk.us avatar

How like us our ancestors were!

In a donor list to an early 17thc convent, all the men (so far, only men!) are named & their titles given, & then the thing that they paid for is listed. One didn't just give money to the project; donors want their name on this window, that door, this meaningful space within the edifice.

My gift gets me glory, and all that.

Selflessness is/was clearly not a prized virtue.

scholar_farmer,
@scholar_farmer@zirk.us avatar

An update on the monastic chronicle: they did have women donors — they’re listed in a separate chapter of the chronicle.

I didn’t realize money was gendered!

scholar_farmer,
@scholar_farmer@zirk.us avatar

And in my monastic chronicle, men evidently pay for things, while women pay more often for prayers and services. (This is ca. 1606-7)

Not entirely, of course: one of the women pays for a window, and two others for specific door-latches. ("I scrimped and saved and paid for this lock and key, look at me!")

Also, you could be a servant and still help fund the monastery.





  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines