@Elendol@b0rk To be pedantic they are not Linux-exclusive. It's rare nowadays but some other open source projects still use mailinglists and #sourcehut built even a UI around the mailinglist workflow. And patch files can be quite useful sometimes. The low-level git CLI should not be opinionated, for that we have other tools which built upon it.
Right job done. That's me paid for the use of my #SourceHut account. Kind of gives me a warm fuzzy feeling knowing I'm supporting a fantastic service like this.
I finally deleted my GitHub account. Let's see what the effects of it will be in the days/weeks to come. Hopefully I can stay off GitHub.
It was very scary, but if not now, then when, if not me, then who? The fact that it is so scary is part of the problem!
Anyway, I am freaking out a little, but it should be alright. Am very happy with #codeberg and #sourcehut and nothing (work) critical was depending on GitHub for a long time now.
Right so my first task tomorrow after work is to setup an annual payment plan for the fantastic services provided to me from #SourceHut .
They not only host my git repo but my website too so it's only fair that I pay. #OpenSource
Does anyone here use #sourcehut and pay a yearly fee ? I've recently migrated everything over and I'm wanting to setup a yearly payment but just want reassuring that it does go to towards supporting the service and it's devs. I know sounds a daft question but just wanting to see what other uses views are. Do you use this service and do you pay ?
I see I've to put a LICENSE in my #Sourcehut repo's . I'm not 100% about this but I've included an MIT License for now as I'm not worried about folks copying or modifying stuff. I hope that's right. 🙃 https://mit-license.org/
As I migrate slowly over to #Sourcehut I'm going to stop having multiple dotfile repo's based on the wm name. Instead there will only ever be my current dots. I'll be leaving the old ones if it helps others over on Codeberg though. I think this is the right way to do it from now rather than having a repo full of various dotfile setups.
Is it possible to verify your #sourcehut repo in your #Mastodon profile like you can in your #Codeberg or #GitHub ??
I tried adding the usual link in my bio but nothing. It's not important TBH just thought I'd try.
Hmmm I have published my blog to #sourcehut and it's visible. Went into my DNS and changed the cname for my custom domain from the codeberg one to the one as instructed by Sourcehut which for me would be:
justine IN CNAME pages.sr.ht.
But it doesn't show the page I get an SSL error instead, yet if I revert back to my Codeberg cname:
So using hut on sr.ht wasn't that painful at all. I've managed to get my blog published just need to edit it a little and change my DNS so it's served from #sourcehut now. Also if you're wondering ? Yes I am testing things before fully committing to Sourcehut. #Git
One thing I've wondered about the #sourcehut web interface is why there is no link at the top to https://paste.sr.ht/ ?
There is probably a valid reason for this.
Je découvre que @CodeGouvFr héberge son code sur #sourcehut. C'est une bonne chose qu'il ne soit pas sur Github, mais pourquoi ne pas pousser la logique au bout et déployer une instance dédiée de Gitlab ou Gitea, par exemple?
(À part l'esthétique super badass de sr.ht, bien sûr)
A question for any #sourcehut users who submit builds to the builds.sr.ht service via its git.sr.ht integration (https://man.sr.ht/builds.sr.ht/#gitsrht): are there any tricks to having a persistent main branch .build.yml file in place, whilst trying to minimise the load on the build service?
I know about git push -o skip-ci, but I'm definitely not going to remember to do that on every push to (or config of) each non-build-worthy branch.
Finally created an account on https://sr.ht/ - what a great experience! No-frills webinterface and #gpg support out of the box.
And I loved "if you are unhappy with stripe payment, get in touch". This is really how it should be, I feel heard! #sourcehut@drewdevault
@pkw can I send you patches or something to https://git.sr.ht/~j9000/gui1/tree etc? Do you think we can use :package-inferred-system to make a LISPUSERS style monorepo like
lispusers/intro/gui/eg1.lisp
lispusers/intro/this/the-other.lisp
lispusers/integrated-sub-package/all.lisp
all as a heavily integrated community repo / ASDF system ?
@screwtape I'm looking at options for free public hosting.
Sourcehut seems the best. The guy that made it is an open source proponent.
The only downside of sourcehut is that you can't give access to a repo to other accounts through the web ui.
I'm guessing the paid option might allow that, and I wouldn't mind spending $20/year to get that.
Github seems to work fine, and i just created a free account with no CC. But it's MS :(