LAbdelaaty, to politicalscience

I’m putting together my list of authors to interview for this semester. @politicalscience, have you published a new or new-ish book in IR/CP (very broadly conceived)? Have you read a recent book in those fields that you liked? Please let me know!!

LAbdelaaty, to politicalscience

Coming up this fall on : I am looking forward to podcast episodes with these brilliant authors about their exciting new books! 🎙️📚

@politicalscience

dredmorbius, to reddit

Google is getting a lot worse because of the Reddit blackouts

With Google’s generally poor search results nowadays, appending “reddit” has long been the default way I search for almost anything (and no, I’m not ready to get my info from an AI chatbot, either). But given the sheer volume of subreddits that are currently unavailable — including some of the most-subscribed subreddits — clicking through many Reddit links in search results takes me to a message saying the subreddit is private. ...

https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/13/23759942/google-reddit-subreddit-blackout-protests

Seems Google (and Bing ... by extension DDG) might want to consider whether they want to be working on Maggie's farm no more.

dredmorbius,

It's not often that I get to point out Internet Monopolies being sharecroppers.

The real dish here is that Reddit was one of the few domains in which the ad-fed and (ad-centric media turns everything to shit, reverse of Midas) wasn't ... overly dominant.

And now courtesy of mismanagement by , , , and the Reddit board, which as been in a death spiral for years is suddenly getting far, far worse.

I've commented multiple times that I rely far more on traditional media (mostly books and magazine articles) these days than the Web. Sites/services such as , , and have been absolutely vital for this, and despite much of the online world getting markedly worse, these are bright spots.

(Internet Archive, Wikipedia / Wikimedia, Project Gutenberg, and a handful of other sites/services are among the other bright spots which happen to operate inside the law, though the fact that useful sites have to violate law says a hell of a lot about how corrupt and societally-failing the law is these days.)

My for now are based strongly on library research techniques I'd learned in the 1980s: research topics of interest, find major works and the authors of those works, read those, and if the same names or works keep turning up then find and read those. I'll also make heavy use of podcasts, especially those reviewing books and/or interviewing authors (particularly on academic topics), most notably the .

This may not lead you to truth, but it will virtually always point you to the foundations of present understanding and orthodoxy.

Truly principled authors will note conflicting / contradictory viewpoints --- is excellent in this regard. Even unprincipled authors will often point out key voices in opposition to them, though usually by trash-talking and belittling them. (I'd found a wonderful example of this in a Reason review on Conway & Oreskes latest book The Big Myth.)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • mdbf
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • everett
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • love
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines