@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

FuglyDuck

@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

I'm really annoyed by how much Brave Search is pushing AI

I’ve been using Brave Search supplemented by Startpage for the past 2+ years. When I search for something, I want to get results for credible webpages, not a summary of unknown quality. I liked the previous AI inclusion because it was instant, didn’t take up much space, and I could quickly navigate to the websites referenced...

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

DDG sold out and allowed trackers on the mobile app. It’s a slow slide but it’s inevitable

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

pi-holes can’t stop websites you use from collecting your data. they’ve already started accepting cash for things (by way of mobile browser.). it’s only a matter of time before it slides into more things- if it hasn’t already.

currently I’m using start-page and it’s good enough for my needs. The advantage there is they’re in the EU, and have enhanced privacy requirements

Edit: I’ve used Firefox since their first beta. Now I feel old…

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

maybe this will finally motivate all the idiot men in congress to do something about plastic pollution. (and maybe climate change in general.)

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Maybe we should sanction them.

Yeah. Probably.

“Sorry best we can do is more bombs, officially define antisemitism as calling these guys assholes, and, uh, oh yeah, giving their military benefits packages!”

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

sooo much shit, it’s hard to keep it all in one post.

FuglyDuck, (edited )
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

I dunno. It definitely will incentivize “otherising” of the Jewish diaspora. Which may be a tertiary objective of it. And it will definitely lead to increased conflict.

Which is a shame because most the Jews I know well enough to talk to about it, are extremely anti-genocide, and they’re vocal about it because… they know “I’m Jewish, [awkward stare]” is a great way to not get dinged for politics at work. (At least when the political topic is Gaza.)

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Guess there’s always an exception, huh?

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

That’s some pretty convoluted reasoning, there.

I applaud the effort. But either they are or they aren’t.

Thomas is married to an insurrectionist, allito is flying symbols used by the insurrectionists.

And the other conservatives on the court are all ardently supporting Trump with half baked rulings buying increasing amounts of time to- they hope- delay the trial long enough for it to not matter.

I wouldn’t actually call them sympathizers- I’d just call them insurrectionists.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Red flags. Lots and lots of red flags, too.

Wonder if he keeps them in his right pocket…

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Just because he asked how the weather was… doesn’t mean he started it!

FuglyDuck, (edited )
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Infectious disease, also it could have been a macabre threat of some sort.

In any case, you assume the worst and evacuate because if you assume it’s “just a stunt” and it’s not people die.

I agree it’s probably just a stunt, but until you know that, you don’t know that.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Blood in vials might be concerning but evacuation of a whole building for it is ridiculous.

In short… this was a suspicious package, and it’s patently ridiculous to not treat it as a suspicious package.

work place accidents have different responses than (potential) terrorism. and hospitals have different responses than office buildings.

You’re working in the context of a hospital. You have (presumably) the necessary PPE and training to work around infectious agents and be safe. None of that’s going to be true in a generic office building. You’re going to be lucky if the cleaners have a box of gloves and there’s an expired, unchecked and pilfered OSHA cabinet with some bandages, gloves, a stupid CPR mask and a shit load of Tylenol and bandaids.

Hospitals have to weigh the risk and difficulty of moving patients, as well the risk of whatever potential attack is there. A generic office building is exceedingly unlikely to have patients that can’t be moved, or shouldn’t be moved, and it’s extremely unlikely that someone will die because they’re asked to wait outside as it would be with a hospital (in say, somebody coming from car accident.)

For office buildings, it’s simpler and safer to just dump the building than it is to have a more nuanced approach in large part because morons’ll get in the way of a proper search for other materials, effectively prolonging the amount of time it takes, and if there are other materials, everybody whose still in the building is at risk until the suspect material is found and disposed of.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

I just don’t see how closed vials could threaten the lives of anyone, much less an entire building. It’s not a loose powder or something. It probably was a threat, but those are common these days. They wouldn’t evacuate if it was a letter with some generic “gonna kill you” threat written on it.

actually, most protocols say you do.

Because that one time it is a real threat, people die if you don’t.

Again, it’s not just the closed vials. it’s possibly whatever is under them. It’s possibly what else was left in the building. You might not dump for a threatening letter sent, but you would dump for a letter that was on top of a heavy box. It’s a suspicious package. you treat it like a suspicious package until you know it’s not.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

And the puritans on the east coast. New England?

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Some how… I get the feeling they were answering the poll under orders.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

artist never had a cat.

I don’t either. but I do love ‘fixing it’ for cat people to put it the ‘right way’ when I visit their homes. their cats love me.

Democratic US lawmakers introduce bill to bar foreign payments to president (www.reuters.com)

Democratic U.S. lawmakers introduced legislation on Tuesday that would bar the president and other top officials from accepting payments from foreign governments while in office, a measure clearly aimed at Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump....

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

“wait it’s not already?!” - every rational person reading this.

FuglyDuck, (edited )
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

From my understanding there’s two critical gaps.

One is showing that Trump knew he was violating campaign finances, and that he intending to defraud (somebody.)

The other was a thing that was not addressed very well by the prosecution was who was being defrauded. If the purpose of the crime was to defraud voters… he was very late on that score.

(It was in fact government officials and others who read business financial statements being defrauded.)

For the first, I’m not sure you can prove beyond reasonable doubt Trump knows his son’s name, never mind he knows and understands esoteric campaign laws.

For the second, it might be an oversight.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

In this case intent does matter. It’s a fraud trial. And it’s elevated to a felony because he had to be intending to cover up another crime.

Let’s say someone genuinely thought an apple was a pear. That’s not fraud because there was no intent to deceive, it was just an honest mistake.

To take the analogy a step further, and make it more accurate, maybe the my knew the apple wasn’t a pear, and maybe the prosecution is alleging the cashier ate the original pear, and they’re selling the apple as a pear to hide that.

To elevate it to a felony, they’d have to show that there was the intent to conceal a crime. Which means they had to know that eating the pear was itself a crime.

Make sense?

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

He’s not being tried for the campaign finance law, this is separate and about him falsifying business records- it’s a felony because his intent was to cover up the campaign thing.

So they could conceivably argue that Trump didn’t know the campaign thing was a problem and there couldn’t have possibly meant to conceal it. At this point taking the misdemeanor would be a win.

FuglyDuck, (edited )
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

I’m so glad you came in here to explain how I’m wrong.

Oh. Might want to take a gander at the actual statutes. They make it very clear intent is actually a necessary part.

Second degree

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the second degree when, with intent to defraud, he:

  1. Makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or
  2. Alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or
  3. Omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he knows to be imposed upon him by law or by the nature of his position; or
  4. Prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.

Falsifying business records in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

And First degree

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

To be clear, im not saying he didn’t do it, im saying the prosecution didn’t cover one aspect during the trial (that trump knew he was covering up a crime.)

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

We’re not discussing murder.

We’re discussing business fraud. Which (linked to another reply) absolutely requires intent to defraud. - and for the first degree version, an intent to conceal a prior crime.

It’s literally in the text of the law.

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

The issue here is that NY statute requires an intention to defraud, and for the first degree felony, an intention to conceal a crime (either one you’re about to do, will do, or have done,).

intentionally concealing a prior crime kind of requires an awareness that thing being concealed was a prior crime.

An argument that trump was unaware the prior thing was a crime could knock it down to a misdemeanor. (Or get a hung jury.)

FuglyDuck, (edited )
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

“I would say it’s not great for mental health. I mean the gaslighting, the condemnation. The shame. The never being perfect enough. And that’s just god. Don’t get me started on all the Karen’s.”

If the preacher was being honest, maybe.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • JUstTest
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines