@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Silentiea

@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Windows 11 Start menu ads are now rolling out to everyone (www.theverge.com)

Microsoft is starting to enable ads inside the Start menu on Windows 11 for all users. After testing these briefly with Windows Insiders earlier this month, Microsoft has started to distribute update KB5036980 to Windows 11 users this week, which includes “recommendations” for apps from the Microsoft Store in the Start menu....

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Are they sponsored? I was under the impression they were usually just Microsoft advertising their own shitty stuff? Ads, sure. But for it to be sponsored, someone else has to pay for them

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

From the article it’s getting very heavily opposed by the chamber of commerce, so

Maybe not controversial among, like, people, but

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

There is so no way that would happen here…

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Yeah. Mine did too, in that they’re not, like, people. But it’s controversial as far as lawmakers and judges go

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Gotcha, yeah. I get that. They’re just lobbying the lawmakers and cetera, causing controversy.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It’s based on the incorrect belief that gender is rooted in biology and that, therefore, any trans person must be biologically broken in some way to identify the way we do.

That’s the trick, isn’t it? Of course I’m trans because of my body, my society, my physical world. But that doesn’t mean me being trans is wrong or broken at all. I’m a woman because of my body and my society and my world just like every other woman is. Literally every one of them. Only difference is how long it took everyone to figure it out.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

“most moral army in the world” is a bit like the dryest lake.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

ask for full price with the bugs and multiplayer disabled

At least the bugs are disabled /s

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

You don’t get to blame AI for this. Reddit was already overrun by corporate and US gov trolls long before AI.

Ftfy

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I can put rings on my rosters if I want to, and no newspaper is going to stop me.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I’m leaving it

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The worst part is that they really do feel this way. They really do feel that our very presence hurts them somehow. So despite all the excitement saying otherwise, they project that feeling of offended-ness onto everyone else and say they just want to protect people.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

“Fake news.” – used to negate the sources of an argument, often while providing alternate or misleading information to push an individual’s own interpretation of a subject; popularized by politicians in the US in 2016

Oh, yeah, just “politicians”. There was one in particular, but I forget which one.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It’s like the orcas and yachts thing, but less polite

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Millennials new impulse buy: food and rent.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The Hulu/Disney/ESPN bundle already exists as a prototype, but I’m sure it’ll go much further from there

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Hours of effort to create prompts to maneuver the models output until it looks closer to what you wanted, possibly with the addition of touch-up or addition steps at the end likely needed for certain kinds of image to clean up things the ai struggles with (like, say, hands) or to add something in particular the ai didn’t understand (like, say, a monster of your own invention or something).

It’s easy to say that doesn’t count, that the prompt engineer could have just come up with their final prompt in the first place, but then does it count when a digital painter sketches an outline a dozen times before deciding it’s where they want it? After all, the digital artist could have just drawn it the way they wanted at first blush. But I’d bet you’ll say the time the digital artist spent “counts” as time spent working on an art piece, even if you might be inclined to say the prompt engineer’s time doesn’t. I’d be interested to hear your take.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Okay. Got it. Charitable interpretation is dead.

Ohhh, so this is why people tag their images by popular art commisioners

There’s a point where writing becomes art. You either agree with that, or you don’t believe any kind of literature or poetry counts as art. In the latter case, that’s a bit of an extreme take but I guess you’re welcome to your opinion. In the former case, there’s a lone somewhere between Tolkien and XanthemG where something starts being art.

For the same reason ChatGPT can’t make you any less lonely.

Only insofar as neither can a book. And yeah, there’s obviously a difference there, but the difference isn’t inherent to ai. Ai isn’t a person, it’s a tool. Dismissing anything made by the tool because the tool was used to make them is the position that I think is ridiculous. I’m not claiming that all of the “ai art” people are posting everywhere is definitely "real art"and needs to be taken seriously. I’m claiming that it’s possible for an artist to use ai in the production of real art.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Dude, I don’t care how many iterations a person goes through. I care that the piece contains a bit of their soul.

the prompt artist who spends a 3-month chunk of their life toiling over their latest piece,

I’m curious what could possibly convince you that someone put their soul into their work? Or why the assumption is always that ai is the only tool being used.

Here’s a list of artists using ai tools in their work.

But further, the prompt artist doesn’t even make it.

Again, ai is a tool. That’s like saying digital artists didn’t make their paintings, the printer did. Or maybe it’s like saying the director didn’t make the movie, the actors and cameras did. Actually, I really like the director analogy. They give directions to the actors as many times as they need to get the take they want, and then they finalize it later with post production.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Well, the word deep fake is literally from the ai boom, but I understand you to mean doctored images to make it look like someone was doing a porn when they didn’t was already a thing.

And yeah, it very much was. But unless you were already a high profile individual like a popular celebrity, or mayyybe if you happened to be attractive to the one guy making them, they didn’t tend to get made of you, and certainly not well. Now, anyone with a crush and a photo of you can make your face and a pretty decent approximation of your naked body move around and make noises while doing the nasty. And they can do it many orders of magnitude faster and with less skill than before.

So no, you don’t need ai for it to exist and be somewhat problematic, but ai makes it much more problematic.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Does the director take credit for their actor’s acting, though? Usually, the actors win the award for best acting.

So an ai artist shouldn’t earn any awards for best painting. Directors are still credited as artists. I’m not saying using ai makes you a painter, or any other kind of artist. I’m just saying that “ai” doesn’t magically make a creation “not art”. And yeah, it’s possible to create zero effort slop with ai that can look a lot more interesting than the zero effort slop you can make with just paint, but a kid splattering paint everywhere doesn’t make Jackson Pollock not be an artist.

Silentiea,
@Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

As an artist can use a guitar instead of their own mouth. But can an artist’s art be the guitar playing itself… hm.

Absolutely it can. Numerous artists have created work that unfolds itself into something beautiful through their planning but not through their power.

But can choosing a book from a library be art?

Choosing a urinal counts as art. Of course choosing a book can.

The argument here hinges on the definitions of inherently vague words.

Art is an inherently vague word.

I would rather watch one made by people who care.

This right here is the crux of my argument. What about art made by people who care, but made with ai? Is it so impossible that people might care about something and use ai to make it?

I absolutely do not contend that using ai makes something art. I merely contend that using ai (even as a major part of a work) is not sufficient to make it not art. To whit,

Joel Haver uses an AI filter to do his rotoscoping. I like Joel Haver just fine.

It sounds like you agree with me on that, at least in principle.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • everett
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • tester
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines