alsaaas

alsaaas, 1 day ago

that’s quite unorthodox and controversial

alsaaas, 1 day ago

agreed, but where meme?

alsaaas, 2 days ago

I have exclusuvely been listening to “The History of Rome” by Mike Duncan

still not done with it lol

alsaaas, 2 days ago

That’s how I was made aware of “The History of Rome”. I listened to the last chapters of “Revolutions” and decided to start from the beginning before listening to the rest.

My current “roadmap” of sorts is to finish “The History of Rome”, then "The History of Byzantium* (not made by Duncan) and listen to the rest of “Revolutions” afterwards

alsaaas, 2 days ago

I always replace “the economy” with “rich people’s yacht money” in such cases

alsaaas, 2 days ago

Capitalism working as intended

alsaaas, 2 days ago (edited 1 day ago)

I wouldn’t count on that tbh, especially since it won’t solve anything…

We are not in the same boat at all (metaphorically and physically as well for the most part): The 90% have a little boat at best with most of the Global South being on a raft, with the rich basically being on a Dreadnought but in hysterical size of like cruiseships

alsaaas, 2 days ago

yes, that’s exactly me

alsaaas, 3 days ago (edited 3 days ago)

jagut man kann sich streiten wann die SPD das “S” und damit die Rote Fahne verkauft hat. Wahrscheinlich mit Kautski oder allg. 1914, spätestens aber mit dem kriminellen Zerbomben Jugoslawiens der Zivilbevölkerung im ehem. Jugoslawien bzw. allg. Schröder

alsaaas, 3 days ago

Stimmt (hatte das eher als Regionsbezeichnung gemeint), macht aber die völkerrechtswidrige Invasion gegen UN-Beschluss und ohne belegte Bedgründung nicht weniger kriminell

alsaaas, 4 days ago (edited 3 days ago)

not even rsa4090? (tbh i have no idea about cryptography, any of those terms or what elliptic keys are and why they are better… like why aren’t they the default in GPG?)

alsaaas, 3 days ago

good to know, thanks for the intro! o/

alsaaas, 3 days ago (edited 3 days ago)

Did you actually mean it? :0

like I just took it for another ironic remark/shitpost lol

alsaaas, 5 days ago

I can’t tell what song it is… :/ Any clues?

alsaaas, 5 days ago (edited 5 days ago)

I’m glad Fedora comes with the most usable no-bs/out-of-the-way (in my subjective experience) DE by default. Yes I do run it with Tweaks and a few extensions, but otherwise I have no need for extensive customization for customization’s sake (which seems so many ppls problem with GNOME, smth that I couldn’t find more irrelevant), since everything about its UI/UX is so intuitive. I understand if people don’t like its opinionated workflow, but it’s just right for me personally…

I don’t get the proposal either way bc Fedora has always been the spearhead of vanilla GNOME and there is an official KDE spin iirc

alsaaas, 3 days ago (edited 3 days ago)

This is very similar to my experience tho I have skipped most of my ricing/customization phase with Gnome bc I just didn’t feel the need to do much about it bar a few extensions

alsaaas, 3 days ago

I plan on switching to Slowroll once it’s matured, but I think I’ll stay with Gnome :p

alsaaas, 5 days ago

I- don’t get it

alsaaas, 5 days ago (edited 5 days ago)

ok lol, but no

what did the hussy ever do to you?

alsaaas, 5 days ago

well it is the depiction of an imagined humanist (/communist) future. ig there is quite a bit of overlap

alsaaas, 5 days ago (edited 5 days ago)

snaps are a proprietary vendor-locked format, the only redeeming quality is being able to run them in cli (once Flatpak get that too, there is no valid reason for snaps to exist).

I just find it midly infuriating (if that even is a thing, meaning I hate it but it’s not that significant for me to distro hop on my work laptop) to have two “universal” package formats on my system with Canonical shoving the objectively worse one (from a free/libre pov) down my throat…

alsaaas, 5 days ago

no you didn’t, you can install flatpak using the terminal but iirc flatpak are mostly made with GUI applications in mind, while snaps support installing command line utils quite well

alsaaas, 3 days ago (edited 3 days ago)

luckily no actual red would ever include mutualists (in the red)

smth smth the hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that it has a boss smth smth markets force even cooperatives to behave like capitalist cooperations smth smth

alsaaas, 2 days ago

…no? I just wouldn’t include them as reds, tho they still seem to be generally anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist, progressive and so on

even if they’re largely irrelevant and an internet phenomenon