@cdarwin@c.im
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

cdarwin

@cdarwin@c.im

Social and economic justice, technology and tennis. I'll have what @jbf1755 is having.
searchable

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Despite entering hospice care over a year ago, Jimmy Carter refuses to miss an election.

At 99 years of age, the former president cast a mail-in ballot for the May primary election this week, grandson Jason Carter said Wednesday on The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Monica Pearson Show.
“He’s not going to miss an election!” the younger Carter said. “It’s important to him. I mean, that’s the person he is.”
Jason Carter said he confided in his grandfather last weekend that he’s never sure how to respond when asked how the former president is doing.
“He kind of laughed a little bit, and he looked at me, and he said: ‘I don’t know myself,’” Jason Carter said. “But I think he’s OK.
You know, he’s hanging in there, and he knows he’s not in charge. So he’s just waiting for what’s next.”
Over the past year, Jimmy Carter celebrated his 99th birthday in October and attended the annual peanut festival.
He entered hospice care in his hometown of Plains, Georgia, just over a year ago. He also mourned the loss of his wife, former first lady Rosalynn Carter, who passed away last November at age 96.
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/jimmy-carter-voted-in-georgia-primary-and-is-doing-ok-in-plains-grandson-says/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Biden threat to stop Israel arms shipments welcomed by Democrats and criticized by Israeli officials and Republicans – live

US representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York,
said that “[Biden]’s historic shift to include Israel in US standards makes the world safer and our values clear.”
“President Biden enforcing conditions on US military aid and holding the Israeli gov to the same bar we hold all our allies to is the responsible, secure, and just thing to do,” she added

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/may/09/biden-israel-arms-republican-democrat-trump-latest-updates?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Debate rages over the extent to which the Gaza protests on the political left constitute coded or even direct attacks on Jews.
But far less attention has been paid to a trend on the right:
For all of their rhetoric of the moment, increasingly through the Trump era
many Republicans have helped inject into the mainstream thinly veiled anti-Jewish messages with deep historical roots.

The conspiracy theory taking on fresh currency is one that dates back hundreds of years and has perennially bubbled into view: m
that a shady cabal of wealthy Jews secretly controls events and institutions contrary to the national interest of whatever country it is operating in.
The current formulation of the trope taps into the populist loathing of an elite “ruling class.”
“Globalists” or “globalist elites” are blamed for everything from Black Lives Matter to the influx of migrants across the southern border,
often described as a plot to replace native-born Americans with foreigners who will vote for Democrats.

The favored personification of the globalist enemy is George Soros, the 93-year-old Hungarian American Jewish financier and Holocaust survivor who has spent billions in support of liberal causes and democratic institutions.
This language is hardly new
— Mr. Soros became a boogeyman of the American far right long before the ascendancy of Mr. Trump.
And the elected officials now invoking him or the globalists rarely, if ever, directly mention Jews or blame them outright.
Some of them may not immediately understand the antisemitic resonance of the meme, and in some cases its use may simply be reflexive political rhetoric.
But its rising ubiquity reflects the breaking down of old guardrails on all types of degrading speech,
and the cross-pollination with the raw, sometimes hate-filled speech of the extreme right,
in a party under the sway of the norm-defying former, and perhaps future, president

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/09/us/antisemitism-republicans-trump.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

This post is a good way to start thinking about the information economy that led us to a place where
a Republican judge helps delay accountability for stealing nuclear documents and storing them in a closet normally storing campaign swag.

This information economy creates an environment in which a former prosecutor like Aileen Cannon
either believes, or claims to believe, outlandish claims of bias and ill-treatment
solely because career national security officials — rebranded by Trump as the Deep State — did their job.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2024/05/08/how-we-got-to-a-place-where-right-wingers-cheer-stealing-nuclear-documents/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The world must reject Russia’s nuclear posturing – but not ignore the danger

In 2014, Putin’s covert operation to seize and then annex Crimea shocked the world.

In 2015, Russia launched a surprise military intervention into Syria.

The following year Putin directed an unprecedented operation to sway the US presidential elections.

He did the same in Europe in 2017.

Then he tried to kill off an enemy by poisoninghim on British soil, attacked the US with cyberweapons, and, finally, carried out a full-scale invasion of a neighboring country – Ukraine.

Who can know with enough confidence when a reckless autocrat like this,
surrounded by yes-men,
might decide the time is right to teach the West a lesson with a tactical nuclear strike?

Internal Russian documents, as well as the latest Kremlin statement, suggest Russia’s threshold for using a nuclear weapon is fairly high
but getting lower.

Putin’s nuclear redlines are nearly impossible for Ukraine, Nato, or anyone outside Putin’s innermost circle to know with the certainty needed in light of the gravity of the issue.

That Russia has not used nuclear weapons yet offers little confidence that it won’t do so in the future.

It’s not hard to imagine circumstances in which using a nuclear weapon might seem like the rational choice from the Kremlin’s point of view,
especially if faced with a rapid reversal of the gains for which Russia has paid dearly,
or if confronting western escalation that only nuclear weapons can match

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/may/08/russia-nuclear-posturing-nato-ukraine?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

New York Times editor Joe Kahn says defending democracy is a partisan act

and he won’t do it
https://presswatchers.org/2024/05/new-york-times-editor-joe-kahn-says-defending-democracy-is-a-partisan-act-and-he-wont-do-it/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

In Connecticut immunization rates have risen for two straight years,
exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

During the 2022-2023 school year, more than 97 percent of Connecticut kindergartners were vaccinated against measles,
up from 95.7 percent the year before and 95.3 percent the year before that.

Why?

The answer can be found in a 2021 law that ⭐️eliminated the state’s religious exemption to vaccination.⭐️

Immunization rates of 95 percent or higher are required to provide herd immunity against measles.
When rates drop,
which is true in many states that now offer either religious or philosophical exemptions,
measles comes back.

The most dramatic example being an outbreak in Philadelphia in 1991
that centered on two fundamentalist churches that refused vaccines.
During a three-month period, measles virus infected 1,400 people in the city and killed nine.
All the deaths were in young children.
https://dianeravitch.net/2024/05/06/good-news-connecticut-eliminates-religious-exemptions-for-vaccines/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Israel-Gaza war live:

Ceasefire talks to resume in Cairo;

Over the last few hours, Hezbollah says it has carried out a drone attack on an Israelimilitary position near the northern Israeli town of Metula on Monday according to Reuters.
The Israeli military later confirmed two soldiers were killed in the attack.
Hezbollah also says it has sent dozens of rockets towards military targets across the border with Israel.
Israel and Hezbollah have been engaged in daily cross-border strikes over the past six months, in parallel with Israel’s war in Gaza.
Hezbollah has so far restricted its attacks to a strip of northern Israel, seeking to draw Israeli forces away from Gaza, explains Reuters.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/may/06/israel-gaza-hamas-ceasefire-updates?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

After Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, some German Americans formed groups to support the Nazi party in Germany and attempt to influence American politics.
The most notorious of these groups was
the 🔸German-American Bund🔸, which tried to model itself as an American arm of Hitler’s Third Reich.
Although these groups wore uniforms and touted swastikas, in reality, they had few ties to Nazi Germany and their support among the larger German-American community was minimal.
Nevertheless, the group strongly promoted hatred for Jews and strove to bring Nazi-style fascism to the United States.
Initial support for American fascist organizations did come from Germany.
In May 1933 Nazi Deputy Führer Rudolf Hess gave authority to German immigrant
👉Heinz to create an American Nazi organization.
Shortly thereafter the 🔸Friends of New Germany🔸was created with help from the German consul in New York City.
The organization was based in New York but had a strong presence in Chicago.
The organization led by Spanknobel was openly pro-Nazi and engaged in activities
such as storming the German-language New Yorker Staats-Zeitung with the demand that Nazi-sympathetic articles be published,
and the infiltration of other non-political German-American organizations.
Spanknobel was ousted as the leader and subsequently deported in October 1933 when it was discovered he had failed to register as a foreigner agent.

The organization existed into the mid-1930s, although it always remained small, with a membership of between 5,000-10,000.

Mostly German citizens living in America and German emigrants who only recently had become citizens composed its ranks.

The organization busied itself with verbal attacks against Jews, Communists, and the Versailles Treaty.

Until 1935 the organization was openly supported by the Third Reich, although soon Nazi officials realized the organization was doing more harm than good in America and in December 1935 Hess ordered that all German citizens leave the Friends of New Germany;
also, all the group’s leaders were recalled to Germany.

Not long after the Friends of New Germany fell out of favor with the Nazis and was dismantled,
a new organization with similar goals arose in its place.

Formed in March 1936 in Buffalo/New York and calling itself the ♦️German-American Bund ♦️or Amerikadeutscher Volksbund,
the organization chose Fritz as its Bundesleiter.

The organization was soon filled with those calling themselves “Germans in America” and dreamed of the day when Nazism would rule the United States.

Although they were instructed not to accept German citizens in their organization,
they were not about to turn down anyone interested and many immigrants joined.

It is estimated that around 25% of Bund members were German nationals
—the rest being mostly first or second-generation Germans.

The Bund soon began to hold rallies filled with swastikas, Nazi salutes, and the singing of German songs.

The Bund created recreational camps such as Camp Siegfried in New York and Camp Nordland in New Jersey.

It also established Camp Hindenburg in Wisconsin and the group met frequently in Milwaukee and Chicago beer halls.
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/american-nazis-german-american-bund-1930s/

cdarwin,
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The Bund created an American version of the Hitler Youth that educated children in the German language, German history and Nazi philosophy.

Although this organization tried to differentiate itself from the previously unsuccessful Friends of New Germany, the German Foreign Ministry commented that
“In reality…they are the same people, with the same principles, and the same appearance”.

The Bund began attracting the attention of the federal government in the summer of 1937 as rumors spread that Kuhn had 200,000 men ready to take up arms.

During that summer an FBI probe of the organization was conducted but no evidence of wrongdoing was found.

Later in 1938 Martin Dies of the House Un-American Activities Committee wildly proclaimed that Kuhn had 480,000 followers.

More accurate records show that at the peak of his power in 1938 Kuhn had only 8,500 members and another 5,000 “sympathizers”.

In February 1939 Kuhn and the Bund held their largest rally in Madison Square Garden
—ironically, one which marked the beginning of the end for the organization.

In front of a crowd of 22,000, flanked by a massive portrait of George Washington, swastikas, and Americans flags,
Kuhn attacked FDR for being part of a Bolshevik-Jewish conspiracy,
calling him “Frank D. Rosenfeld” and criticizing the New Deal,
which Kuhn had deemed “the Jew Deal”.

Three thousand members of the Ordnungsdienst, the militant arm of the Bund, were on hand
and fistfights broke out in the crowd among those who had come to heckle Kuhn.

After the rally, New York District Attorney Thomas Dewey arrested Kuhn on charges of larceny and forgery.

He not only was convicted of these charges but he also confessed to being arrested multiple times for drunkenness, carrying on extra-marital affairs, and pocketing $15,000 from the Madison Square Garden rally.

After the war, Kuhn was deported to Germany;
he died there unceremoniously in 1951.

Following Kuhn’s arrest, the Bund slowly withered away, until its dissolution on 8 December 1941,
after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

After the United States declared war on Germany, federal officials began to arrest Bund officials.

Kuhn’s successor Gerhard Kunze was captured in Mexico and sentenced to 15 years of prison for “subversive activities”.

In the end, the Bund of German immigrants held little power, if any, and often made average Americans less sympathetic to Germany,
as the Bund’s extreme anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi views did not play well with the American public.

Even Nazi Germany realized this and attempted to distance itself from the Bund.

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Aaron Sorkin confirmed during a live recording of “The Town” podcast that
he is currently working on some kind of sequel to “The Social Network,”
David Fincher’s acclaimed 2010 drama about the creation of Facebook that won Sorkin the Oscar for best adapted screenplay.

“Look, yeah, I’ll be writing about this,” Sorkin said about the social media company’s recent years.
“I blame Facebook for January 6.”
Sorkin would not answer why he blamed Facebook for Trump supporters storming the U.S. Capitol, but he teased:
“You’re going to need to buy a movie ticket.”.
“Facebook has been, among other things, tuning its algorithm to promote the most divisive material possible.
Because that is what will increase engagement.
That is what will get you to
— what they call inside the hallways of Facebook
— ‘the infinite scroll’ …
There’s supposed to be a constant tension at Facebook between growth and integrity...
There isn’t.
It’s just growth.”

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/aaron-sorkin-social-network-2-sequel-january-6-facebook-1235983390/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Accused Canadian serial murderer admits killing four Indigenous women

Jeremy Skibicki, charged with four counts of first-degree murder, is believed to have left bodies of at least two victims in a landfill

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/06/canada-serial-killer-indigenous-women-landfill?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The office of International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan issued a statement Friday
denouncing threats of retaliation
after Israel’s prime minister and U.S. lawmakers attacked the intergovernmental body over reports that it is preparing arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials related to the war on Gaza.

The ICC statement, which does not mention any individual or country by name, says
the court’s “independence and impartiality are undermined” when “individuals threaten to retaliate against the court or against court personnel should the office, in fulfillment of its mandate, make decisions about investigations or cases falling within its jurisdiction.”
“Such threats, even when not acted upon, may also constitute an offense against the administration of justice under Art. 70 of the Rome Statute,” the statement continues.
“The office insists that all attempts to impede, intimidate, or improperly influence its officials cease immediately.”
https://truthout.org/articles/icc-denounces-threats-of-retaliation-as-possible-netanyahu-arrest-warrant-looms/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Judge Merchan threatens Trump with jail time for gag order violations in hush-money trial

The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s criminal hush-money trial on Monday held him in criminal contempt for the 10th time and warned he could face jail for continued violations of a gag order.

“Mr Trump, as you know the prosecution has filed three separate motions to find you in criminal contempt,” Merchan said. “It appears that the $1,000 fines are not a deterrent.”
Merchan continued: “The last thing I want to do is put you in jail. You are the former president of the United States and possibly the next president as well ... but at the end of the day, I have a job to do and part of that job is to protect the dignity of the judicial system.”
He also said that Trump’s actions “constitute a direct attack on the rule of law. I cannot allow that to continue”.
“So as much as I do not want to impose a jail sanction,” Merchan added sternly, “I want you to understand that I will, if necessary and appropriate.”

Judge Merchan’s admonition to Trump came in response to the Republican presidential frontrunner’s repeated commentary on trial witnesses and jurors, which flouts the judge’s order barring him from speaking about those who are testifying at the high-profile proceedings and panelists weighing his fate.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/06/trump-hush-money-trial-day-12?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The Founders drew a line between peaceful protest and armed insurrection

Today, armed protesters believe they are evoking the spirit of the Founders,
yet, the history of the Whiskey Rebellion offers a different perspective,
showing the Founders made a clear distinction between public assembly and protest
— protected by the federal Constitution
— and threats of insurrection.

The Founders were also weary of a tyrannical government,
after all they had just fought a war against King George III and Parliament over the issue.

But, figures like George Washington understood that armed protests and domestic violence threatened the young republic.

Shays’ Rebellion of 1786-1787 in Western Massachusetts exposed the weakness in the Articles of Confederation and spurred on the creation the federal Constitution.

When unrest started to brew in Western Pennsylvania, just years after the formation of the new federal government,
Washington made it clear the boundaries of acceptable protest.

The Whiskey Rebellion started outside Pittsburgh after the federal government passed a new excise tax in 1791,
which became called the “Whiskey Tax.”

Many local small farmers were also distillers and they considered the duty an unfair tax on their livelihood.

Over the course of several years, their protests became bolder and more violent.

Resistance came to a head on July 16, 1794,
when an armed mob of about 500 protesters attacked and burned the Pittsburgh home of tax collector John Neville.

The incident became known as the Battle of Bower Hill,
and although casualty numbers are unclear,
one of the leaders of the rebellion, Major James McFarlane,
died during the firefight and became a martyr to the rebel cause.

Many frontiersmen saw McFarlane’s death as murder by the federal government and further radicalized the countryside.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/04/30/founders-drew-line-between-peaceful-protest-armed-insurrection/

cdarwin,
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

David Bradford, a lawyer from Washington, Pa., used the violence at Bower Hill to gain support for the rebellion, and on Aug. 1, about 7,000 people arrived at Braddock’s Field just outside Pittsburgh for a demonstration.

The mostly poor and propertyless protesters threatened to loot and ransack the wealthy residents of Pittsburgh.

Inspired by the French Revolution, many radical rebels called for violence and destruction just for the sake of punishing the upper class,
many of whom had nothing to do with the excise tax.

Fortunately, Pittsburgh escaped destruction because local officials gave into most of the demands of the insurgents,
which included expelling three men who were seen as spies.
But it was not just economic divides that surfaced. The whiskey rebels were a frontier people and saw themselves distinctly different from east coast Americans.

Some even wanted their own independent republic consisting of the five western counties of Pennsylvania and one county in Virginia.

The typical narrative of American history shows a divide between the North and South,
but in the 1790s, there was also a distinction between the East and West, as well.

Bradford and the rebels capitalized on this western discord by forming a short-lived alliance between moderates and radicals of the six western counties.

Their hope for independence quickly evaporated by the end of the summer of 1794.
And so the frontier people, under economic distress and increasingly feeling disconnected with eastern political leaders, created one of the first tests for the new federal Constitution
— the Whiskey Rebellion.

President George Washington, urged on by federalist Alexander Hamilton, decided to intervene and to put down the armed protest and rebellion.

cdarwin,
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

First, Washington sent a delegation to negotiate with the insurgents.

Attorney General William Bradford, Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Jasper Yates and Sen. James Ross were the representatives of the government.

On behalf of the western rebels, Hugh Henry Brackenridge, a local lawyer, and Albert Gallatin, the future secretary of treasury, met with federal commissioners to resolve the conflict.

The mediation worked and a peace deal was struck,
but the federal delegation thought it was “absolutely necessary that the Civil authority should be aided by a military force in order to secure a due execution of the Laws

With this advice Washington decided to raise a militia.

Since the regular Army was preoccupied by fighting Native Americans in present-day Ohio,
Washington activated the New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia militias to confront the rebels,
and warned them to disperse by Sept. 1.

Washington himself led the militia of about 13,000 soldiers into Pennsylvania in October.

It remains the only time a sitting president has done so
— led a militia in the field against an enemy.

While in Pennsylvania, Washington wrote to the citizens of Carlisle insisting,
“The union of good men is a basis, on which the security of our internal peace and the stability of our Government may safely rest. It will always prove an adequate rampart against the vicious and disorderly.”

To Washington it was the actions of good people that maintained peace and political stability.
The arrival of the federalized militia in Western Pennsylvania effectively ended the armed uprising.

Some of the leaders of the Whiskey Rebellion such as David Bradford fled to Spanish-held Baton Rouge
and the other leaders who remained in the state were arrested and brought to Philadelphia for trial.

In the end, two were convicted of treason, but Washington pardoned them before their scheduled execution.

Although the violence ended, many of the frontiersmen found a new political identity as Jeffersonian democrats,
which would help elect Thomas Jefferson president in 1800.

In 1794, disgruntled, disposed and economically disadvantaged protesters challenged the Constitution in the name of individual liberty and states’ rights,
and they did so with guns and threats of violence.

Protests are protected by the Constitution, but openly bringing weapons to a protest is not a peaceful assembly,
something George Washington deeply understood.

Rather than stoking violence and insurrection, perhaps political leaders today should learn from history to calm fears,
to bring peace and to uphold their promises to defend and protect the republic
— and the Constitution.

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The Nazis believed in “good blood” that ought to be sought out, preserved, and expanded,
and in “bad blood”, which was to be identified, then ruthlessly eradicated.
The latter gave us the horrors of the Holocaust.
The former led to the 💥Lebensborn💥(“Spring of Life”) program,
which went to bizarre and often sinister lengths in an attempt to increase the stock of “racially valuable” Germanic children.
Partly a human selective breeding program,
partly a massive child kidnapping policy,
it was another dark chapter in the history of the Third Reich.

To say that the powers-that-be in the Third Reich were obsessed with
race and racial purity would be an understatement.
Most are familiar with the darkest manifestations of that obsession: the Holocaust and the murder of millions of racial undesirables.
Another sinister manifestation, can be glimpsed in the lengths the Nazis went to in order increase the numbers of the racially desirable.
In 1935, the Schutstaffel (SS) implemented a program known as to increase the “racially pure” population by increasing the “Aryan” birthrate.
Much of that amounted to a selective breeding program, just like breeding prize cattle,
whereby unmarried “pure” Aryan women were matched up with pure SS members.
Upon impregnation, they were often housed in SS-run maternity homes until they gave birth.
The offspring were often adopted by pure Aryan families, particularly from the SS.
https://historycollection.com/heres-what-to-know-about-lebensborn-the-nazi-human-selective-breeding-and-child-abduction-program/

cdarwin,
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Eventually, after decades of alienation,
the Lebensborn children started coming out of the shadows.

In the early 2000s, a group of them, by then in their 60s, started going public with their plight, as they sought to find out who their true parents had been.

A typical example was Gisela Heidenreich, who came to understand while still a toddler that something was wrong,
when she overheard people referring to her as “the SS bastard”.

Born in a Lebensborn clinic in the Norwegian capital of Oslo, in 1943, Gisela’s mother had been a secretary in a Lebensborn program facility in Munich, who was impregnated by a married SS officer.

The pregnant secretary then travelled from her home in Bavaria to Oslo, to give birth discretely in one of the program’s Norwegian facilities.

Growing up, Gisela was unable to get answers from her mother, who refused to answer questions about the circumstances surrounding her birth or the identity of her father.

It was not until she was an adult that she finally managed to track him down.

It was a complex encounter, replete with doubts and ambiguities.

Aware of just what types of atrocities the Nazis, and especially the SS, had committed, Gisela was unsure how she would react upon meeting her father.

As she described how it went down, however:
“When I first met him it was on a station platform. I ran into his arms and all I thought was ‘I’ve got a father … I accuse myself of shutting out who my father was. I never asked him what he did. My own reaction has helped me to understand how people in those days just put the blinders on and ignored the terrible things that were happening.”

She visited the Lebensborn home where her mother had been employed,
Steinhoering, about an hour from Munich.

It was there that Gisela’s mother had played a key role in signing program babies up for adoption.

The former Lebensborn facility, now a center for the disabled, still had visible SS symbols,
and its grounds contained a statue erected in the breeding program’s heyday, of an Aryan mother breastfeeding her children.

cdarwin,
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The singer, songwriter, and environmentalist
Anni-Frid Lyngstad,
best known as one of the lead singers of Swedish pop group ABBA,
was one of the Tyskerbarnas children.

Anni-Frid was the product of a union between a German occupation soldier and a Norwegian woman:
her mother had carried on an affair with a German sergeant during the Nazi occupation.

After Anni-Frid’s birth in November of 1945, both her mother and grandmother were branded as collaborationist traitors
– “horizontal collaboration”
– and ostracized.

As a result of the ostracism and dim prospects in Norway,
Anni-Frid’s mother and grandmother were forced to emigrate to Sweden,
where the future pop star’s mother died of kidney failure when Anni-Frid was an infant.

She was raised in Sweden by her grandmother.

Anni-Frid exhibited a precocious musical talent from an early age,
especially a captivating and beautiful voice.

A series of smalltime singing gigs eventually led her to international fame and stardom with the pop group ABBA.

However, her grandmother had died shortly before the group was formed, and thus never experienced her granddaughter’s success.

The ABBA star had grown up assuming that her father had died,
but she eventually discovered that he was still alive,
and the two had an emotional reunion in her Swedish villa in 1977.

She eventually took up the cause of the thousands of Norwegian Tyskerbarnas,
and the efforts to secure justice and redress for the discrimination they suffered after the war.

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Amazon provides free communication monitoring technology to prisons that monitor all of their phone calls.

They thenutilize that communication data to build out their AI systems,

creating massive profit for Amazon and zero compensation for communities who are unaware of their role in their own forced labor.

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/us-prisons-jails-ai-mass-monitor-millions-inmate/story?id=66370244

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Thousands of Israelis take to streets of Tel Aviv
to demand cease-fire
and Netanyahu’s resignation

Protesters are demanding the government reach a deal to bring the hostages back from Gaza,
for new elections
and the resignation of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The demonstration took place as a delegation of the Palestinian militant group Hamas was in Cairo for cease-fire talks with Israel

https://apnews.com/video/israel-government-israel-hamas-war-israel-protests-and-demonstrations-benjamin-netanyahu-80fa94064ad4429ebb52531ad3ca12dc

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

This Welsh lawmaker is trying to make it illegal for politicians to lie
If passed in the Welsh parliament, law criminalizing dishonesty in politics would be the first of its kind

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/welsh-politicians-lying-vote-1.7192025

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

In the Room Where German Tycoons Agreed to Fund Hitler’s Rise To Power

“And there they stand, affectless, like twenty-four calculating machines at the gates of Hell.” –Éric Vuillard, The Order ofthe Day
The invitations, sent by telegram four days earlier, left no doubt.
The capital was calling.
On Monday, February 20, 1933, at 6 pm, about two dozen of Nazi Germany’s wealthiest and most influential businessmen arrived,
on foot or by chauffeured car,
to attend a meeting at the official residence of the Reichstag president,
Hermann Göring, in the heart of Berlin’s government and business district.

The attendees included Günther Quandt, a textile producer turned arms-and-battery tycoon;
Friedrich Flick, a steel magnate;
Baron August von Finck, a Bavarian finance mogul;
Kurt Schmitt, CEO of the insurance behemoth Allianz;
executives from the chemicals conglomerate IG Farben
and the potash giant Wintershall;
and Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, chairman-through-marriage of the Krupp steel empire.

Three weeks earlier, Adolf Hitler had seized power in Germany
after concluding a backroom deal that led the Reich president, Paul von Hindenburg,
to appoint Hitler as chancellor.

Now the leader of the Nazi Party wanted to “explain his policies”
to the group of industrialists, financiers, executives, and heirs,
or at least that’s what he’d led them to believe.

The businessmen were hoping for reassurance concerning the direction of Germany’s economy under this new government.
They would not get it.
Hitler had his own plans for the meeting, and the country.

The businessmen arrived on time at Göring’s palatial sand-red residence on the south bank of Berlin’s Spree River, next door to the Reichstag.
But they were kept waiting
— not something that the impatient tycoons were particularly used to or fond of.
Göring, their host, didn’t greet them until fifteen minutes after the scheduled start time.
In tow was Walther Funk, the dumpy and balding chief press officer for Hitler’s government.

The new chancellor arrived even later,
accompanied by Otto Wagener, his main economic adviser.
The master of ceremonies was Hjalmar Schacht, formerly president of the Reichsbank.
(As it turned out, Funk, Schacht, Göring, and Schmitt,
four of Hitler’s future ministers of economic affairs, were all present.)

The meeting was the culmination of years of careful groundwork laid by Hitler’s officials
—years of cultivating relationships with the tycoons to build up enthusiasm for the Nazi cause.

After shaking hands with the businessmen, Hitler launched into a rambling ninety-minute speech,
delivered without notes or pauses.
But instead of the policy talk that had been promised,
Hitler gave a sweeping diagnosis of the current political moment.
The year 1918 had been a catastrophic turning point in German history,
with the defeat of the German Empire in World War I and the revolution in Russia,
during which the Communists came to power.
In Hitler’s eyes, the time had come to settle the struggle between the right and the left once and for all.

Hitler didn’t speak about abolishing labor unions, rearmament, war, or the removal of Jews from German life.
But he did provide a glimpse of what was to come:
“We must first gain complete power if we want to crush the other side completely.”
Hitler argued that, in supporting his rise as führer, the moguls would in effect be supporting themselves, their firms, and their fortunes.
💥“Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy,” 💥the forty-three-year-old chancellor said.
“It is conceivable only if the people have a sound idea of authority and personality. 🔸Everything positive, good and valuable, which has been achieved in the world in the field of economics and culture, is solely attributable to the importance of personality.”🔸

Near the end of his speech, Hitler laid out how that would happen.
In only two weeks, on March 5, the people of Germany would determine the country’s future by casting their votes in the national election
—“the last election,” according to Hitler.
One way or another, democracy would fall.
Germany’s new chancellor intended to dissolve it entirely and replace it with a dictatorship.
“Regardless of the outcome,” he warned,
“there would be no retreat.
There are only two possibilities,
either to crowd back the opponent on constitutional grounds
or a struggle will be conducted with other weapons, which may demand greater sacrifices.”

🔥If the election didn’t bring Hitler’s party into control, a civil war between the right and the left would certainly erupt, he intimated. 🔥
Hitler waxed poetic:
“I hope the German people recognize the greatness of the hour.
It shall decide the next ten or probably even hundred years.”

https://lithub.com/in-the-room-where-german-tycoons-agreed-to-fund-hitlers-rise-to-power/

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

It wasn’t so long ago that the uneven distribution of wealth had distributed itself somewhat evenly across the Mountain West:
Jackson Hole, Wyoming; Sun Valley, Idaho; Telluride, Colorado.
But as Nick Bowlin sketches out in this Harper’s feature, nothing quite stacks up to Big Sky, Montana.
A private resort socked away above the town counts numerous billionaires among its members,
and even down below the average home price clocks in at $2.5 million.
Boom times for the Gulfstream crowd aren’t the real point, though.
Instead, Bowlin chips away the private-equity varnish to reveal the chasm between the haves and the have-nots.
Big Sky has always run on the labor of ski-resort employees,
but now, those employees are pushed into company-owned converted motels or faraway towns where they still need to work multiple jobs to keep a foothold as the cost of living rises precipitously.
Meanwhile, the town itself isn’t really a town at all, but a hodgepodge of homeowners’ associations and other organizations that approximate the work of a mayor or city council
—neither of which exist in Big Sky.
This is what a company town looks like in the 21st century:
not just a place where inhabitants live and work for a corporate behemoth,
but where they scrape by in service of the Tres Comas Club in exchange for access to the natural resource that drew them there in the first place.
https://longreads.com/2024/05/03/the-top-5-longreads-of-the-week-514/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • khanakhh
  • PowerRangers
  • Leos
  • DreamBathrooms
  • vwfavf
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • All magazines