"Earlier this year, the Spanish police Guardia Civil sent legal requests through Swiss police to #Wire and #Proton, which are both based in Switzerland. (..)
Wire responded providing the email address used to register the Wire account, which was a Protonmail address.
@protonprivacy responded providing the recovery email for that Protonmail account, which was an iCloud email address, according to the documents."
@protonprivacy@AndyGER
Thanks for the clarification, yes I've mixed up the two emailsb purpose.
So you confirm that the initial verification email isn't kept or accessible to Proton after its initial use?
I still believe that some sort of captcha would be preferable to requiring a verification email, though.
Thanks
I'm curious to hear what other people think of 1Password's handling of the breach of its Okta panel. The company didn't disclose even bare-bones details until after I emailed them asking about it. Then they released only bare-bones details that left out important stuff, like the hackers adding a new ID provider to their Okta dashboard.
Then, rather than provide an up-to-date account of the event, including investigators' latest findings, the company releases a week-old status report.
I have come to expect more transparency from 1Password. Why didn't the company proactively disclose the event? Why isn't it providing updated findings regarding the employee MacBook that was suspected of being compromised? Why did 1Password learn of the breach only after receiving an email alert that someone (who had already obtained administrative access) requested a report? All this uncertainty just leaves open doubts and suspicions and undoes years of trust people have developed in the company.
I've heard lots of people praise 1Password's response. What am I missing? Am I being unfair?
@Wednesday always has helpful insights on matters like this, so I'm cc'ing her, but am interested in what others think as well.
@schizanon
The main point in using an FPGA is replicating the original hardware as closely as possible, to the point of being cycle accurate
When you (properly) replicate the original system it's like playing on the original, emulators only get to a point as far as accuracy goes.
Also, to replicate a system in an FPGA you need hardware schemas - and many systems are being reverse engineered exactly because of that, ultimately preserving them.
