3/ The argument that the government has no resources to really understand #AI is also false.
The US gov, national labs, as well & major public universities have incredible levels of talent in AI.
All available to help craft regulations without capture.
It's also a familiar irony that an industry that has been mining public institutions for everyone with talent & trying to hire them away... is implying that there is no role for those institutions to play.
@jsrailton If you have a very quickly evolving technology, a government cannot keep up with evolving technology and will be years behind and prevent innovation. So this cuts both wyas unless you can have broad regulation that works well with only principles to uphold. (the Telecom Act had such broad rules that have lasted the test of time and enabled net neutrality for insance). It is possible to gave good regulatios, but doesn't happen ofren.
@jsrailton When you look at C-11 and C-18, you see clueless government trying to meddle with the Internet without understanding it. It takes time for governments to acquire knowledge to regulate new tecnology.
When the A320 plane was introduced, the FAA and EASA quickly gave it its flight certificate because it met hardware requirements. neither had expertise to test/evaluate software and the A320 had its share of software issues in its first years. For the A330/340 they learned.
Add comment