You were arguing that religious myth books were accounts of contain traces of historical fact, so go on and prove it.
Fixed your strawman for you.
All of your blathering is meaningless without links to evidence from reliable, established sources.
You mean like the four links I already provided indicating that there were traces of historical fact in the Bible?
If you just want to argue around a strawman binaryism if your own projected claim that the Bible is inerrant, have fun, but I’ve got better things to do.