@Codeberg I've migrated my important projects to codeberg, and will do the rest when I have time. I have no desire to interact with github anymore, and so far codeberg has been everything I've needed so far.
The only issue I have had is some performance problems with the CI, but I don't think the CI is production quality yet.
@melroy@Codeberg I wouldn't say "often", at least in my experience. While I have no actual data to back this up, I have a feeling it's been down about as much at github lately (yes, I'm aware of the downtime a few days ago).
@loke@Codeberg Well the kbin community and developers experience a down-time of about once every other day at this moment. Often in the early mornings.
@melroy@Codeberg I mostly interact with the site by pushing and pulling to the repositories and more rarely via the website. Perhaps the repositories are more stable so that I don't usually see the issues?
@loke
Me too! My oldest projects are still on Savannah Non-GNU (sorry, I prefer Mercurial, to Git) while the most recent is on Codeberg.
And it's also #REUSE compliant (see @fsfe )! @Codeberg
@AAMfP@loke@fsfe@Codeberg
Codeberg is a fine GitHub replacement but it could be so much more. I still use #SourceForge for my bigger projects as it provides:
email lists
web hosting with rsync & ssh access
multiple VCS options
Git is great, but monoculture is not. I'd really like to see choices on the front end as well (e.g. cgit for browsing repositories).
@wickedsmoke@AAMfP@fsfe@Codeberg I would certainly love to be able to use Mercurial instead of git, but at the same time I can understand why that isn't high on Codeberg's priority list.
@loke
Savannah has a very old and peculiar interface, let alone the registration policy (hand-checked!), but it actually offers many features and I like it.
But it's probably (surely) unbearable for modern (younger) developers @wickedsmoke. @fsfe@Codeberg
Add comment