Its now running on a dedicated server with 6 cores/12 threads and 32 gb ram. I hope this will be enough for the near future. Nevertheless, new users should still prefer to signup on other instances.
hey 👋 do you have some Grafana dashboard where we can check user increase?
Given the no. of posts on this instance I guess it has quite a large user base and I’m really surprised how it manages to run on that amount of resources 😄
I was wondering the same thing. I initially created an account on some obscure instance because I didn't fully understand what I was doing. I just abandoned it and set up a new one on lemmy world. I think I'm getting the hang of it now. I'm curious to see how Lemmy grows and matures over time. There is still a learning curve that will keep some people away.
You should be able to join any instance and get the same fediverse experience. But something is broken and if you don't join the biggest instance then you are missing out.
Thank you for your hard work! Although I kinda foresee for the future if Lemmy really would become the new "reddit" with such servers and millions of users, wouldn't that also rise the server costs and ultimately make the hosts dependent on asking money for it, maybe by a paywall or by ads? I think to make this community really be "free" without any host responsible for spending a huge amount of money for servers, the best solution would be to make the actual "servers" be a p2p cluster. Unfortunately I'm not quite sure how to realize that without losing a huge fraction of the model if a lot of nodes (i.e., the actual users) are offline. Sorry, I'm just brainstorming.
You might want to check the Earthstar project: https://earthstar-project.org/ They are working on that. Right now, it's super early; they are building the foundations. Peer-to-peer is unfortunately much more difficult to code then servers, because less people have built the building-blocks required, and because mobile phones are actively making it hard to run peer-to-peer apps.
Hey, what do you mean by "scale horizontally"? There are multiple approaches to tackle this.
Have multiple nodes/pods for the same instance and run them on a cloud-like service provider
have RO-instances to handle to read-load
share/merge bigger communities/subs over multiple instances
...
All of these requiere most likely a major rewrite/change of Lemmy server software I guess. They are already addressed as issues/feature requests on github In my opinion the first option would fit the most.
My comment was without knowing the topology of Lemmy at all, but my thoughts were initially that vertically scaling can have diminishing returns past a certain threshold. Since the servers seem to be struggling I'm wondering if that has been surpassed and if it's more cost-effective and reliable to scale this way? But if the application isn't written in that way, or the underlying data store isn't equipped for multiple instances then fair enough, I'd be interested as to why especially if Lemmy grows. I'll take a look at open issues and educate myself a bit more though.
Add comment