What does this matter, is there any information or proof that she would not have been able to lease the land even if he and FOUR OTHER JUSTICES didn't write an opinion that, spoiler alert, only limited the EPAs ability to write things down and then treat them as law (in the same way the ATF or the FCC have created rules which create new crimes out of the scope of the powers afforded to them through legislation passed by congress)?
At what point do lawyers cite a SCOTUS decision as precident and their opposition is like "yeah but that's an Alito decision" and they're like "oh yeah, oops."
There’s a check… impeachment and removal. But with the current majority being the entire coordinated plan for the last few decades that’s never going to happen.
There once was a time when a large number of republican voters, after learning about watergate, called their representatives demanding that they impeach Nixon.
Now, the open corruption is ok as long as “my team is winning”
Add comment