m3t00,
@m3t00@lemmy.world avatar

marketing and bean counters drag down every good idea. That and the belief all the world’s problems can be solved in one paragraph. I used to return a 5 second sleep for bad login attempts. Just to slow down the bots trying to brute force a login. video over increasingly cheap bandwidth for a screen the size of a postcard will soon be replaced with a simpler solution. This is progress. another one bites the dust.

EmperorHenry,
@EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Odysee? Rumble?

Freetube? Re-vanced?

Basil,

Odysee is a right wing hellscape

EmperorHenry,
@EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Nope

CthulhuOnIce,

so is rumble lol

advanderar,

Ah it’s the web so

await new Promise(res => setTimeout(res, 5000));

griD,

LGTM, Ship it!

clicks approve

onichama,

As long as working around it is as easy as it is nowadays, I just think it’s funny.

cordlesslamp,

Funny, or pathetic?

Probably both.

jeebus,
jeebus avatar

I don't understand why people don't pay for YouTube premium. Best streaming service I pay for. No ad blockers required. When I watch YouTube at someone else's house the ads drive me nuts.

RogueBanana,

Fuck google that’s why

HiddenLayer5,

100%. It’s the principle of the thing. I don’t care how good YouTube Red is, simply the fact that they pulled as much bullshit as they have in an attempt to sucker people into paying for it warrants a total and permanent boycott. What Google is doing is utterly unacceptable and I’m not going to reward them for abusing my digital rights.

HKayn,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

Then why are you using Google’s services

HumanPerson,

Are you familiar with the network effect?

HKayn,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

I am. It’s just ironic to say “fuck Google” while continuing to depend on Google’s service

itslilith,
@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar
HKayn,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

You people are arguing that YouTube should be hosting videos without asking for any compensation. You will continue blocking ads no matter how many of them there are.

I hope YouTube just completely paywalls itself so this whining can end already.

griD,

Don’t cut yourself with that edge!

inb4: “But YT operates at a loss and needs monies”. No. Just no. They deliberately worked at a loss to stifle and kill opposition.

RogueBanana,

I wouldn’t mind paying for a service given I pay for my email provider when I can get gmail for free. Pretty ignorant to ignore the whole monopoly and say sToP uSiNg YoUtUbE tHeN. I will take what I need and I won’t give a penny or my data to those dicks. I also hope they paywall so there will be competitive services that I can happily pay for :)

flora_explora,

Not that easy not to use the services of the big tech companies, is it? I don’t get why you would even give them extra money if their main profit is selling your data anyways. The only solution I see is to try to establish independent, people owned spaces/websites and so long the majority is under control of the big tech, don’t feed them your data and don’t feed them any money either.

HKayn,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

I also want people-owned website to take off, but as of right now there is little incentive for people to host their videos on their own when YouTube does it for free and gets you a huge audience.

For now, I have to choose between participating in the adblocker cat-and-mouse game, or just getting my Turkish “friend” to purchase YT Premium and being done with it.

Quik,

because it’s insanely difficult to get along completely without YouTube. Or if you happen to have some kind of business it’s easier said than done to “just not optimize” for Google products or “just not use Google services” like having a Google Maps entry. On a side note, even getting a privacy focused smartphone without using Google services and products is near to impossible (e.g. GrapheneOS only works on Pixel phones…)

madcaesar,

It’s way too fucking expensive.

letsgo,

(a) because it’s too expensive, and (b) it didn’t take a lot of DDGing to find “why am I still getting ads with YT Premium” and it turns out there are a bunch of exceptions that the YTP page doesn’t tell you about.

dontblink,
@dontblink@feddit.it avatar

If it was less expensive and provided some privacy i would probably happily pay for it.

Pat,

Because adblocking is free and if done right not detectable. I haven't had a single issue with ublock on youtube.

I used to pay for premium but they keep upping their prices. At this point ublock on computers + revanced on phone is best way to go. Premium features without paying a cent.

HKayn,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

Agreed. I’m on a family plan and I find that I’m getting my money’s worth, plus saving myself the headache of participating in this cat-and-mouse game.

I’m willing to bet the people who use adblockers and say “fuck Google” in this thread never considered donating to the developers of said adblockers for letting them dodge YouTube’s fee.

Draegur,

I’ve been having an excellent experience with premium as well. I like knowing that I’m directly materially contributing to the people I watch. The only problem I have with YouTube premium lately is that it keeps trying to suggest fucking 8 hours long music streams to my TV and seems as though it’s REFUSING to learn that I don’t want to see that shit unless I’m deliberately searching for it. Get that shit the FUCK outta my feed. Otherwise, it’s the way YouTube was meant to be used.

If I had my way though, I’d nuke YouTube’s ad system from orbit and replace it with this: for ads, NO VIDEO, NO SOUND, ONLY A SLIDE SHOW, CONTAINING ONLY TEXT. 15 Slides or 15 Seconds, MAXIMUM, whichever runs out first. If the user clicks anywhere but the product link, it advances the slide or closes the ad. PERIOD.

dot,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • HiddenLayer5,

    Not with that attitude. There is no reason we can’t cultivate alternatives like PeerTube. No video platform starts with a massive library and if we actually want to take back our digital rights then we have to put our foot down and give a hard “no” to trading those rights away just because we really want to watch a particular creator on a corporate platform. It’s the only way to not only stick it to Google but also let creators know that viewers will not tolerate the likes of Google.

    flashgnash,

    I think the hosting is the real problem. For something like Lemmy where it’s just text it’s not too expensive, but when you need to store and stream videos for free I have to imagine most people wouldn’t be able to afford that without charging for it and the moment you start charging you can’t compete with YouTube anymore

    madcaesar,

    We need to crowdfund a starting base, and after that the site wouid have to charge something just be reasonable to not like asshole youtube.

    flashgnash,

    Majority of people will always choose free, convenient and what they’re used to

    If it’s not free it stands very little chance against something that is all 3

    Cracks_InTheWalls,
    @Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works avatar

    I wonder…

    Suppose you had a company that, at it’s core, was closer a vps provider than anything else. People who want to host videos on the service pay a fee. The hosts can solicit money via the usual means (patreon, personally working with advertisers, merch, whatever), but part of the service agreement is that the hosting service itself cannot place their own ads. You also have some backup system in place where after x amount of time, videos get archived to some outside service (Internet Archive, some peer-to-peer mechanism - no idea what the options are). This is to at least try to mitigate storage limitations and other problems with retaining a large back catalogue.

    All of this is said from a position of deep ignorance - but could something like this work? My stumbling block is anyone running a company is eventually going to need/want an additional revenue stream and ads are an obvious first stop. For this to exist it would pretty much take an activist owner not budging and ruling with an iron fist. That, and would such a service be able to offer hobbyist hosts a fair price, given this is where a lot of people start?

    jackpot,
    @jackpot@lemmy.ml avatar

    i think the solution could be a FOSS torrenting site where everyone hosts their own videos (or maybe a stream only site?). people are already willing to fork over for netflix so maybe if the content quality was extremely high theyd shift (e.g. nebula)

    dessalines,

    Yep, this is already a solved problem via torrents. All that’s needed is a site (like lemmy or something else) to host the links, and help with content discovery.

    jackpot,
    @jackpot@lemmy.ml avatar

    dessalines can you make a poetry community on lemmy.ml

    dessalines,
    jackpot,
    @jackpot@lemmy.ml avatar

    oh what weird i thought i had looked it up, thank you!

    Default_Defect,
    @Default_Defect@midwest.social avatar

    Yeah, I’ll let you know when anyone I watch even considers giving peertube a moment of consideration.

    Wes_Dev,

    “5E3”

    SorryQuick,

    I assume they wrote it as 5000 and it got changed to 5E3 by the minifier as it saves a byte?

    NoFun4You,

    Lol

    MaxVoltage,
    @MaxVoltage@lemmy.world avatar

    html programerz dont do that/s

    dan,
    @dan@upvote.au avatar

    Yeah that’d be my guess. Minifiers squeeze every byte. true and false get minified to !0 and !1 respectively.

    Wes_Dev,

    Never heard of a minifier. It’s a brilliant idea though.

    SorryQuick,

    Most websites use them. Smaller file -> less bandwidth -> lower costs.

    xkforce,

    This seems like a pretty dumb thing to do to try to wipe out a browser with 2% marketshare.

    griD,

    Obviously there a people in charge now who will never understand the Streisand effect. They could have kept it quiet and just… allow… the technical adept users to do their thing. Now, they are the laughing stock and get unwanted attention. Also, from my layman understanding, this shit won’t fly in the EU at all.

    Or, to say it differently: This is the best thing to happen to Mozilla in quite a long time and I’m a fan.

    Anticorp,

    I’m out of the loop. What happened? Did someone decompile their code and find definitive proof of a throttle for Firefox?

    Synthead,

    JavaScript is an interpreted language, so no decompilation is necessary, although this is repeatable by using a Firefox user agent.

    kogasa,
    @kogasa@programming.dev avatar

    You can build a virtual machine in JavaScript and execute compiled code on it

    Synthead,

    Neat

    palordrolap,

    Just because you can...

    kogasa,
    @kogasa@programming.dev avatar

    Oh yeah, you shouldn’t. But people do this for fingerprinting, bot detection, and other “adversarial” scenarios where you really don’t like the person executing your code. It’s somewhat plausible Google would use this technique to do something scummy like this (although that is not the case).

    Relevant article and a great read: www.nullpt.rs/reverse-engineering-tiktok-vm-1

    griD,

    some explanation

    To be fair, they used setTimeout() and not thread.sleep() because the latter isn’t possible out of the box in JS ^^

    Thorned_Rose,
    Thorned_Rose avatar

    Thanks for the explainer! Also, Google's response is such a crock of shit.

    Wild_Mastic,

    Users who have ad blockers installed may experience suboptimal viewing

    Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They’re lunatics.

    Cornelius_Wangenheim,

    It won’t stay at 2% if it’s the only browser with a working adblocker.

    evanuggetpi,

    Unfortunately said browser is dependent on Google financing Mozilla.

    lukas,

    I don’t know why this got downvoted. Google gives Mozilla a hefty paycheck to remain the default search engine on Firefox.

    Wes_Dev,

    “I’m switching from Chrome because they killed ad blocking.”

    “OMG! Firefox takes 5 seconds to even load webpages! I’ll just go back to Chrome.”

    The goal is to prevent the competition from growing.

    Scrollone,

    The EU should investigate this

    what_is_a_name,

    Do not worry Vestager lives for shit like this. She’ll make them bend over, take it deep, and pay her for her pleasure.

    veganpizza69,
    @veganpizza69@lemmy.world avatar

    I’m guessing that it’s a way for them to test if ads have been loaded after initial scripts have run, but I’m not going to dig into the code.

    Honestly, the whole ads thing is missing the point. If you desired a public video hosting platform, that needs to be a tax-funded commons. Video hosting and streaming is very expensive. Similarly, users should be donating to keep Lemmy going:

    opencollective.com/mastodonworld

    patreon.com/mastodonworld

    saltnotsugar,

    I only use my programming for good. For instance Bat_Count.exe lets the user enter a number and then the Count from sesame street will count to this number and say “Ah ah ah!” at the end.

    MaryReadsBooks,

    Is there a git? Pleeeeese let there be a git!

    Kyrgizion,

    Even Avogadro’s number?

    PsychedSy,

    Shouldn’t have anything to do with bats, then.

    rekliner,

    How many molecules in the air the bats are flying through?

    One, ah ah ah… Two, ah ah ahhh … Hold on, this might take a while

    PsychedSy,

    <3

    Rognaut,

    One molar mass, two molar mass, a-three molar mass ah ah ah.

    MrWafflesNBacon,

    I’m interested

    x2XS2L0U,

    Does it run with wine on Linux?

    MJBrune,

    count.bat sounds a lot cooler.

    PM_Your_Nudes_Please,

    I feel like we’re regressing back to the Netscape Navigator/Internet Explorer browser war days, when browsers were openly and intentionally breaking functionality on competing sites.

    TropicalDingdong,

    itsthesamething.meme

    griD,

    You’re right. It does have the same energy to it, doesn’t it? But of course, it also feels like that kind of regression permeates nearly every layer of society now, which is really sad. We should get angry before it’s too late.

    SnotFlickerman, (edited )
    @SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    Some of us have been fucking furious for over two decades now and it hasn’t done shit except increase our blood pressure and having all the dumb fucking dimwits around us acting like we’re crazy for being upset at how absolutely fucked things are.

    I’ve been angry since my early twenties. I’m in my forties now and I’m still angry but guess what I’m fucking tired. Which is what the people in charge want, of course. They want us so broken by this system that we give up on fighting back because it’s hard to fight back when you’ve been diagnosed with a fucking disease that will bankrupt you financially.

    They have us right where they want us, and most people are too toothlessly uneducated to even fucking know it’s going on and get so so upset when you get angry for good fucking reasons. “Please calm down” bullshit from motherfuckers enabling the shit streaming down our fucking faces. It’s fucking lunacy.

    Detheroth,

    We live in a beautiful Corpocracy and you will fucking love it, god damn it!! Drink the Disney to distract and calm your weary mind. Consume more and you will feel alive again. Promise! Ignore the crimes of the corporations, without those you wouldn’t have The New Thing you adore and you wouldn’t be yearning for The Next Thing! You NEED The Next New Thing.

    Its fucking sickening. I’m in my early 30s and it feels hopeless. Surely the masses can see the sheer manipulation and control that governments and corporations have over us. Why aren’t more people irate that They are raping the Earth to line Their pockets, fucking Us over in the process?

    Everyone has been polarised into an “Us vs Them” mindset. Keep us divided and channeling our collective rage at each other, lest we actually find power in our overwhelming numbers. It hurts.

    hackris,

    Everyone has been polarised into an “Us vs Them” mindset. Keep us divided and channeling our collective rage at each other, lest we actually find power in our overwhelming numbers. It hurts.

    I’m ready to get downvoted, but this is exactly the reason I’m incredibly sceptical about any conflicts going on, including wars. I just think the possibility of the “two sides” working together just to polarize society is too goddamn high. But of course, as soon as you bring a subject like this into a discussion, you immediately get bombarded with the “you are against my idea so you’re an extremist” kind of vocabulary… For example: “Omg you’re pro-russian” - meanwhile I volunteer to help Ukrainian people, but I guess I love Russia when I do that. Shit’s wild…

    locuester,

    It’s domestic as well. Red vs Blue is just a distraction and you can’t point this out because nearly everyone is divided along those lines to the point of ignoring getting fucked up the ass.

    pimeys,
    @pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io avatar

    Divide and conquer…

    JoeBigelow,
    @JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca avatar

    I think Roosterteeth did a better job than just “a distraction”.

    Let’s give them some credit

    rhizophonic,

    opportunists would gather around a piece of shit if it benefited them

    jackpot,
    @jackpot@lemmy.ml avatar

    theres a marxist term for the last paragraph, whats the word for it?

    Karius,

    Alienation maybe? I’d just describe it as divide and conquer which is a pretty common Marxist description of capital’s political strategy

    jackpot,
    @jackpot@lemmy.ml avatar

    nope, it’s about how the bourgeouis make the proletariat fight each other rather than them

    PreviouslyAmused,

    I haven’t really seen my exact situation & frustration put so perfectly.

    I know it’s exhausting, but just reading this helps remind me that I’m not alone.

    So just know, you’re not alone.

    JoeBigelow,
    @JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca avatar

    There are at least 3 of us

    ZeroMmX,

    Dozens.

    Anticorp,

    Also pushing pop-ups everywhere, except this time they’re part of the site and we can’t easily block them.

    SpaceCadet,
    @SpaceCadet@feddit.nl avatar

    javascript was a mistake

    Synthead,

    100%

    marcos,

    Worse. We are directly headed for the Novel Messenger vs. Lotus Notes times.

    Only the things you brought from your connector supplier will work.

    modifier,

    This comment brought the word GROUPWISE thundering back from the depths of my lower consciousness, where I had worked so hard to relegate it.

    evanuggetpi,

    Lotus Notes. NEVER AGAIN.

    cybervseas,

    This is so much better because of the Geordi template.

    griD,

    Drake is a creep.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • tester
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • everett
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines