spaf,
@spaf@mstdn.social avatar

Brief reminder on cryptocurrencies.
When trying to understand any form of cryptocurrency, understanding valuation relative to something similar is useful:
1 crypto coin == 3 Dutch 1637 tulips == 1/2 unicorn horn == 0.1 the Carnwennan dagger == 1 vial with 5 mermaid tears == 1/3 scroll of invisibility to dragons

Those are approximate as the value of each frequently changes from 0 to multiples of the square root of -1. For the most up-to-date values, check with the clerks at Gringotts.

kkarhan,

@spaf or lile any other #Currency their "#value" is solely based upon convertability.

That's why 5.000 KPW won't buy you a Cheeseburger in the USA, but 5.000 U$D a car and 5.000 XMR :monero: a house or at least an tiny.single-room condo...

All currencies are beased upon acceptance and convertability, and that's why #Bitcoin :bitcoin: and everything else but #Monero are #Shitcoins that prey on people horny for money and greedy af.

Am I wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g

dcroyle,

@spaf The comparison of cryptocurrencies to tulips is grossly unfair. Tulips are tangible, pretty, and carbon neutral.

petrillic,
@petrillic@hachyderm.io avatar

@dcroyle @spaf the bulbs are also edible, unlike an nvidia chip

md,

@petrillic @dcroyle @spaf
nvidia chip is totally edible if broken into small enough pieces.

kittylyst,
@kittylyst@mastodon.social avatar

@md @petrillic @dcroyle @spaf Given how toxic the materials that go into modern chips are, that falls pretty squarely into Pratchett's: "all fungi are edible, some are not edible more than once".

SteveBellovin,
@SteveBellovin@mastodon.lawprofs.org avatar

@kittylyst @md @petrillic @dcroyle @spaf And don't forget phish and chips.

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@spaf Monero's value proposition isn't imaginary. In these times of ubiquitous surveillance and rent-seeking middlemen, digital peer to peer cash that can't be intercepted or traced by 3rd parties is immensely valuable.

But yes, you're absolutely right about all of the rest.

spaf,
@spaf@mstdn.social avatar

@hyc "Immensely valuable" is relative. If you are seeking untraceable ransomware payments, money laundering for transnational crime, supporting terrorists, or channeling funds to despotic regimes, then yes, "immensely valuable" has been suitably demonstrated....but isn't for everyone.

mhkohne,
@mhkohne@mastodon.social avatar

@spaf @hyc Don't forget letting the user irrecoverably lose all their wealth due to normal human error.

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@mhkohne @spaf normal human error cost people to lose their lives when automobiles were introduced. There's always a learning curve with new technologies, that goes without saying.

BabblingGeek,

@hyc @mhkohne @spaf Do. Better.

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@BabblingGeek that will happen over time, just like anything else.

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@spaf I sent Monero to Ukraine to support their defense. This guy didn't use Monero... https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukraine-cryptocurrency-treason/32468929.html

You never know if something you paid for legally will be outlawed in the future. Privacy is for everyone, it's a human right.

exc,

@hyc That article doesn't say how he was caught, but it's perfectly possible to accidentally leak your identity when using any crypto coin including Monero. For example, by openly bragging on social media that you did it. All the security features in the world won't protect you against willing leaks.

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@spaf it's pretty clear that society is moving toward digital money replacing physical cash. Do you really believe it's OK to use money that allows everyone in the world to know your bank balance any time you spend it? Is it OK to have all of "your" money held in unelected institutions that can hold/freeze your individual txns or entire accounts for arbitrary reasons?

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@spaf you referenced a few criminal activities, but they are still by far a tiny percentage of the volume of crypto transactions. But the fact that people on the darkweb trust Monero only underscores that it works as advertised.

https://go.chainalysis.com/2023-crypto-crime-report.html

As with any encryption scheme, if it's not strong enough for the bad guys, it's not strong enough for the good guys either.

md,

@hyc @spaf
Do you have any sources? I'm not familiar with chainalysis.

I'm familiar with crypto coins., I used to mine Monero when it was called Darkcoin. Used to buy BTC in large amounts and resell in smaller amounts making $ on the price difference.

Many buyers were online gamblers. Definitely some money laundering. The res were most like getting coins to but drugs on darknet markets (which I also have experience in).

TL;DR - bullshit

hyc,
@hyc@mastodon.social avatar

@md @spaf Monero was never called Darkcoin, you're thinking of some other scam.

If you don't recognize chainalysis as a valid source that's your problem...

exc,

@hyc No it isn't, it actively destroys value. Criminals don't create value, they extract it from the economy and give nothing in return. This is why we make some things in finance illegal, but these coins have no way to distinguish those by design.

On top of that, Monero is a blatant rent-seeking ponzi scam just like all the rest, that relies on fake trading activity and greedy miners to give it security against 51% attacks.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • thenastyranch
  • JUstTest
  • everett
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines