matthiasott, 3 months ago

@seaotta IIRC, that’s how @w3c editor’s drafts looked like in 90s 🪩

Meyerweb, 3 months ago

@seaotta @w3c My aesthetic is whatever this is.

w3c, 3 months ago

@seaotta for a CSS color module spec, this is embarrassing and genius at the same time!

Please file an issue against https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues and supply info about the browser you used (can’t reproduce it on our end)

seaotta, 3 months ago

@w3c update: it appears base.css failed to load with a 520. It's working fine now but you can duplicate if you delete base.css. Would you like me to still file an issue?

w3c, 3 months ago

@seaotta no, thank you though!

mia, 3 months ago

@seaotta @w3c What issue? That's a full-on aesthetic! Where can I get that design system? 😄

fimion, 3 months ago

@mia @seaotta @w3c so, I can use this in production right?

zachleat, 3 months ago

@fimion @mia @seaotta @w3c did someone ask for a web component https://www.zachleat.com/web/w3c-banner-web-component/

keithjgrant, 3 months ago

@mia @seaotta It reads to me a like a passive aggressive, “Y’all keep citing working draft specs. Knock it off, we’re still tweaking this one!”

w3c, 3 months ago

@mia 😁@seaotta