shaft,
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

OK, draft-rfc8624-bis says:

“This document simply moves the canonical list of algorithms from [RFC8624] to the IANA registry, and defines the registry policies for updating the registry. It does not change the status of any of the algorithms listed in [RFC8624];”

Now, in the table in section 3, column " Signing", algorithms 5 & 7 are listed as "MUST NOT". They are "NOT RECOMMANDED" in RFC 8624 section 3.1. The recommandation for validation also changes (from "MUST" to "SHOULD NOT")

It is slightly different (for the better imo but still) :)

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.html

shaft,
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines