dabeaz, 1 month ago A bit disappointed... >>> exc = ValueError("Bad Value") >>> match exc: ... case ValueError(msg): ... print("Failed:", msg) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module> TypeError: ValueError() accepts 0 positional sub-patterns (1 given) >>>
A bit disappointed...
>>> exc = ValueError("Bad Value") >>> match exc: ... case ValueError(msg): ... print("Failed:", msg) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module> TypeError: ValueError() accepts 0 positional sub-patterns (1 given) >>>
tmr232, 1 month ago @dabeaz Mostly disappointed that I can't think of a way to properly hack around this. The match semantics are very limiting.
@dabeaz Mostly disappointed that I can't think of a way to properly hack around this. The match semantics are very limiting.
match
drj, 1 month ago @dabeaz haha. Because why would "except:", the pre-existing system for matching instances, match "match:", the new system for matching instances written by language dilettantes.
@dabeaz haha. Because why would "except:", the pre-existing system for matching instances, match "match:", the new system for matching instances written by language dilettantes.
dabeaz, 1 month ago @drj It's like the cybertruck of matching.
@drj It's like the cybertruck of matching.
emattiza, 1 month ago @dabeaz exc.args is right there too. Just a juicy match_args def on Exception away...
@dabeaz exc.args is right there too. Just a juicy match_args def on Exception away...
dabeaz, 1 month ago @emattiza Meh. Sounds hacky.
@emattiza Meh. Sounds hacky.
Add comment