Diffgeometer1,
@Diffgeometer1@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@johncarlosbaez Thanks! That makes sense. As you pointed out, if (G) has more than one component then, for example, the degree (0) de Rham cohomology will be isomorphic to (k)-copies of (\mathbb{R}) where (k) is the number of components of (G). On the other hand, the degree (0) cohomology of its Lie algebra is always isomorphic to (\mathbb{R}). So there's no way (H^\bullet_{dR}(G)\simeq H^\bullet(\mathfrak{g})) could be true without the assumption that (G) is connected.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • ethstaker
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • tester
  • everett
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines