A large number of people are misinterpreting this post as “Chris is saying no privacy exists on the Internet”.
No, that’s not what I’m saying.
This is why it’s better to read whole threads before jumping in with errant conclusions before commenting.
What I am saying is that privacy on the Internet is often assumed where there is none, meaning: entities like Meta create the illusion of privacy—but it’s all smoke and mirrors. Even in this post I’m quoting, I believe that I’m making this quite obvious past the first sentence.
Privacy might exist on the Internet but I sure as hell wouldn’t be banking on Meta to be delivering it.