sarah,
@sarah@phpc.social avatar

@mwop I'm hearing rumblings in the Logseq community that Logseq has accepted funding and is moving towards databases, rather than working on the Logseq tool. Have you heard similar? Are you still a loyal Logseq user?

mwop,
@mwop@phpc.social avatar

@sarah Honestly, haven't been paying attention. So far, it still falls in the "just works" category for me. Thanks for the heads-up, though - will keep an eye on it.

Really don't want to have to migrate to something else; there's always a chunk of time while learning a new tool or migrating that feels like you're just spinning wheels, for no discernable gain. 🫤

sarah,
@sarah@phpc.social avatar

@mwop I agree.

There's a post about the database version from April 29: https://discuss.logseq.com/t/why-the-database-version-and-how-its-going/26744

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines