Exactly! The lack of a back up plan is inexcusable. In situations like this, they should have the tester sign some sort of release to keep the implant instead of destroying it. Although the developers weren't dead so maybe they have it at a different company for continuing research? It was different with the amputee who developed an infection; I can understand removal in that instance. But someone who finally has a life just to have it taken away is just not okay.